Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
LZM logo
LZM
SBSW logo
SBSW
JPM logo
JPM
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LZM vs SBSW vs JPM vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LZM
Lifezone Metals Limited

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • GB
Market Cap$353M
5Y Perf.-60.3%
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater Limited

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • ZA
Market Cap$6.98B
5Y Perf.-21.4%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+102.5%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+39.5%

LZM vs SBSW vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LZM logoLZM
SBSW logoSBSW
JPM logoJPM
KO logoKO
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsGoldBanks - DiversifiedBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$353M$6.98B$896.00B$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$1M$238.26B$280.33B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$-60M$-12.39B$57.05B$13.70B
Gross Margin-51.3%21.2%60.0%61.7%
Operating Margin-55.8%18.9%25.9%29.3%
Forward P/E0.2x14.4x25.3x
Total Debt$58M$44.34B$942.38B$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$20M$17.16B$343.34B$10.27B

LZM vs SBSW vs JPM vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LZM
SBSW
JPM
KO
StockDec 21Jun 26Return
Lifezone Metals Lim… (LZM)10039.7-60.3%
Sibanye Stillwater … (SBSW)10078.6-21.4%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100202.5+102.5%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100139.5+39.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LZM vs SBSW vs JPM vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. LZM and SBSW also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇KO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
LZM
Lifezone Metals Limited
The Growth Play

LZM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 6.5%, EPS growth 71.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -28.8%
  • 6.5% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
Best for: growth exposure
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater Limited
The Defensive Pick

SBSW is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 2.28, current ratio 1.78x
  • +41.7% vs LZM's -5.1%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
  • PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.26
  • Beta 0.94, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.

  • 27.8% margin vs LZM's -50.0%
  • 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
  • 13.1% ROA vs LZM's -36.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -13.1%
Best for: quality and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLZM logoLZM6.5% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs LZM's -50.0%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.94 vs LZM's 2.57
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SBSW logoSBSW+41.7% vs LZM's -5.1%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs LZM's -36.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -13.1%

LZM vs SBSW vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LZMLifezone Metals Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

SBSWSibanye Stillwater Limited
FY 2024
Pgm Mining Activities
35.7%$59.5B
Gold Mining Activities
22.3%$37.1B
Platinum Mining Activities
12.3%$20.6B
Palladium Mining Activities
11.9%$19.9B
Rhodium Mining Activities
8.8%$14.7B
Chrome Mining Activities
3.6%$6.1B
Nickel Mining Activities
2.2%$3.6B
Other (3)
3.2%$5.3B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

LZM vs SBSW vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGLZM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 234085.8x LZM's $1M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LZM's -50.0%. On growth, LZM holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLZM logoLZMLifezone Metals L…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1M$238.3B$280.3B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$64M$63.5B$81.4B$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$60M-$12.4B$57.0B$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$66M-$9.5B$100.9B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-51.3%+21.2%+60.0%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-55.8%+18.9%+25.9%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-50.0%-5.2%+20.4%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-55.3%-4.0%+36.0%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+7.1%+25.4%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+56.8%-10.0%+16.0%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SBSW leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 41% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricLZM logoLZMLifezone Metals L…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$353M$7.0B$896.0B$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$392M$8.6B$1.50T$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-23.12x-23.69x16.00x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.20x14.40x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.44x18.36x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue334.25x0.95x3.20x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.31x2.58x2.47x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF67.63x8.88x67.15x
SBSW leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-61 for LZM. LZM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.80x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs LZM's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLZM logoLZMLifezone Metals L…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-60.9%-28.1%+15.9%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-36.2%-8.3%+1.3%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-13.1%+22.9%+4.5%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-16.8%+19.1%+8.9%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92657
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.80x1.00x2.60x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$38M$27.2B$599.0B$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$20M$17.2B$343.3B$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$58M$44.3B$942.4B$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-4.30x1.31x0.74x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,986 for LZM. Over the past 12 months, SBSW leads with a +41.7% total return vs LZM's -5.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs LZM's -28.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLZM logoLZMLifezone Metals L…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-10.3%-29.7%-0.5%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-5.1%+41.7%+21.8%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.3%+44.4%+138.2%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-60.1%-32.2%+118.2%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-60.1%+14.5%+465.8%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-28.4%+13.0%+33.6%+13.7%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LZM's 2.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs SBSW's 46.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLZM logoLZMLifezone Metals L…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.57x2.28x0.94x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.40$21.29$337.25$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.07$6.72$262.71$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+61.4%+46.3%+95.1%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10037.834.859.160.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded757K4.5M7.0M12.7M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LZM as "Buy", SBSW as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 117.0% upside for SBSW (target: $21) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs SBSW's 0.25%.

MetricLZM logoLZMLifezone Metals L…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.00$21.40$339.75$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts2126148
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+1.9%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01556
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.40$5.95$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.9%+0.2%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SBSW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LZM vs SBSW vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LZM or SBSW or JPM or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Lifezone Metals Limited (LZM) is the stronger pick with 652.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lifezone Metals Limited (LZM) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LZM or SBSW or JPM or KO?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Sibanye Stillwater Limited is actually cheaper at 0. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LZM or SBSW or JPM or KO?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -60. 1% for Lifezone Metals Limited (LZM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus LZM's -60. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LZM or SBSW or JPM or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Lifezone Metals Limited's 2. 57β — meaning LZM is approximately -1386% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lifezone Metals Limited (LZM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 80% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LZM or SBSW or JPM or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lifezone Metals Limited (LZM) is pulling ahead at 652.

2% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lifezone Metals Limited grew EPS 71. 2% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LZM or SBSW or JPM or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -1289. 2% for Lifezone Metals Limited — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -1724. 9% for LZM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LZM or SBSW or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) trades at 0. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 25. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBSW: 117. 0% to $21. 40.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LZM or SBSW or JPM or KO?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), SBSW (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. LZM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LZM or SBSW or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Lifezone Metals Limited (LZM) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, LZM: -60. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LZM and SBSW and JPM and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (LZM (Basic Materials) and SBSW (Basic Materials) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LZM is a small-cap high-growth stock; SBSW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. JPM, KO pay a dividend while LZM, SBSW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.