Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
MRT logo
MRT
DKNG logo
DKNG
KO logo
KO
PEP logo
PEP
FLUT logo
FLUT
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MRT vs DKNG vs KO vs PEP vs FLUT vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MRT
Marti Technologies, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyAMEX • TR
Market Cap$146M
5Y Perf.-82.5%
DKNG
DraftKings Inc.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$14.38B
5Y Perf.-51.1%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+46.7%
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$197.17B
5Y Perf.-7.7%
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment plc

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • IE
Market Cap$19.25B
5Y Perf.-43.1%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+100.5%

MRT vs DKNG vs KO vs PEP vs FLUT vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MRT logoMRT
DKNG logoDKNG
KO logoKO
PEP logoPEP
FLUT logoFLUT
JPM logoJPM
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationGambling, Resorts & CasinosBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBeverages - Non-AlcoholicGambling, Resorts & CasinosBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$146M$14.38B$355.61B$197.17B$19.25B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$35M$6.29B$49.28B$93.92B$17.02B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-53M$59M$13.70B$8.24B$-457M$57.05B
Gross Margin47.5%41.8%61.7%54.1%44.2%60.0%
Operating Margin-101.9%0.6%29.3%12.2%4.4%25.9%
Forward P/E122.9x25.3x16.7x19.5x14.4x
Total Debt$87M$1.93B$45.49B$49.90B$13.35B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$8M$1.60B$10.27B$9.16B$3.83B$343.34B

MRT vs DKNG vs KO vs PEP vs FLUT vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MRT
DKNG
KO
PEP
FLUT
JPM
StockAug 21Jun 26Return
Marti Technologies,… (MRT)10017.5-82.5%
DraftKings Inc. (DKNG)10048.9-51.1%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100146.7+46.7%
PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP)10092.3-7.7%
Flutter Entertainme… (FLUT)10056.9-43.1%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100200.5+100.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MRT vs DKNG vs KO vs PEP vs FLUT vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MRT and KO are tied at the top with 2 categories each (6-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. JPM and PEP also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MRT
Marti Technologies, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

MRT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.62, current ratio 0.97x
  • Beta 0.62, current ratio 0.97x
  • 110.3% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
  • Beta 0.62 vs FLUT's 0.94
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
DKNG
DraftKings Inc.
The Growth Play

DKNG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
Best for: growth exposure
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 27.8% margin vs MRT's -151.1%
  • 13.1% ROA vs MRT's -264.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs -147.7%
Best for: quality and efficiency
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
The Income Pick

PEP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 54 yrs, beta -0.11, yield 3.9%
  • 3.9% yield, 54-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment plc
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

FLUT doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
  • PEG 0.81 vs PEP's 5.11
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 19.5x)
  • +21.8% vs FLUT's -59.2%
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMRT logoMRT110.3% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 19.5x)
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs MRT's -151.1%
Stability / SafetyMRT logoMRTBeta 0.62 vs FLUT's 0.94
DividendsPEP logoPEP3.9% yield, 54-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)JPM logoJPM+21.8% vs FLUT's -59.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs MRT's -264.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs -147.7%

MRT vs DKNG vs KO vs PEP vs FLUT vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
MRTMarti Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Other Member
50.3%$298,798
Fuel
32.5%$192,849
Electricity
17.2%$102,030
DKNGDraftKings Inc.
FY 2025
Product and Service, Other
100.0%$423M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
PEPPepsiCo, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FLUTFlutter Entertainment plc
FY 2025
International Segment
57.5%$9.4B
United States Segment
42.5%$7.0B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

MRT vs DKNG vs KO vs PEP vs FLUT vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGFLUT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 8037.2x MRT's $35M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MRT's -151.1%. On growth, MRT holds the edge at +115.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…PEP logoPEPPepsiCo, Inc.FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$35M$6.3B$49.3B$93.9B$17.0B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$31M$313M$15.5B$14.3B$2.4B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$53M$59M$13.7B$8.2B-$457M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$18M$679M$12.6B$7.7B$728M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.5%+41.8%+61.7%+54.1%+44.2%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-101.9%+0.6%+29.3%+12.2%+4.4%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-151.1%+0.9%+27.8%+8.8%-2.7%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-53.0%+10.8%+25.5%+8.2%+4.3%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+115.4%+16.8%+12.1%+5.6%+17.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+33.6%+157.7%+18.2%+66.7%-22.3%+16.0%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — FLUT and JPM each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 41% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs PEP's 7.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…PEP logoPEPPepsiCo, Inc.FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$146M$14.4B$355.6B$197.2B$19.3B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$225M$14.7B$390.8B$237.9B$28.8B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.21x-3580.25x27.18x24.05x-63.96x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.122.88x25.27x16.68x19.53x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x7.37x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple56.63x26.39x16.63x11.32x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.73x2.37x7.42x2.10x1.18x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share22.77x10.40x9.63x2.04x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.20x67.15x25.70x17.84x8.88x
Evenly matched — FLUT and JPM each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-4 for FLUT. KO carries lower financial leverage with a 1.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKNG's 3.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DKNG scores 7/9 vs FLUT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…PEP logoPEPPepsiCo, Inc.FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.9%+41.1%+40.1%-4.4%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.6%+1.3%+13.1%+7.7%-1.6%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-147.7%-0.9%+15.8%+14.9%+4.5%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-138.0%-0.6%+17.3%+16.1%+4.6%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9577545
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.06x1.33x2.43x1.38x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$79M$330M$35.2B$40.7B$9.5B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$1.6B$10.3B$9.2B$3.8B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$87M$1.9B$45.5B$49.9B$13.3B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.71x4.48x10.70x10.34x0.63x0.74x
KO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,753 for MRT. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs FLUT's -59.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs MRT's -45.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…PEP logoPEPPepsiCo, Inc.FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-26.7%-18.7%+20.3%+3.5%-49.3%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-37.5%-23.6%+17.2%+13.4%-59.2%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-83.9%+13.9%+47.0%-11.7%-42.3%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-82.5%-42.7%+65.6%+14.3%-42.8%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.0%+195.9%+121.1%+82.3%-8.4%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-45.5%+4.4%+13.7%-4.1%-16.7%+33.6%
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLUT's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs FLUT's 35.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…PEP logoPEPPepsiCo, Inc.FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.62x0.87x-0.20x-0.11x0.94x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.15$48.78$84.04$171.48$313.69$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.55$20.46$65.35$127.60$91.52$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+54.0%+59.5%+98.3%+84.1%+35.3%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.172.160.641.663.459.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded25K12.1M12.7M6.0M2.7M7.0M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — KO and PEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MRT as "Hold", DKNG as "Buy", KO as "Buy", PEP as "Hold", FLUT as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 88.2% upside for MRT (target: $3) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, PEP offers the higher dividend yield at 3.86% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricMRT logoMRTMarti Technologie…DKNG logoDKNGDraftKings Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…PEP logoPEPPepsiCo, Inc.FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.20$35.75$86.13$167.88$192.50$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts14848452461
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%+3.9%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises05654115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04$5.57$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%+5.8%+0.2%+0.5%+5.8%+3.9%
Evenly matched — KO and PEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MRT vs DKNG vs KO vs PEP vs FLUT vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MRT or DKNG or KO or PEP or FLUT or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Marti Technologies, Inc.

(MRT) is the stronger pick with 110. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MRT or DKNG or KO or PEP or FLUT or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 11x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MRT or DKNG or KO or PEP or FLUT or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -82. 5% for Marti Technologies, Inc. (MRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus MRT's -63. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MRT or DKNG or KO or PEP or FLUT or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Flutter Entertainment plc's 0. 94β — meaning FLUT is approximately -572% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 133% versus 3% for DraftKings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MRT or DKNG or KO or PEP or FLUT or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marti Technologies, Inc.

(MRT) is pulling ahead at 110. 3% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MRT or DKNG or KO or PEP or FLUT or JPM?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -105. 6% for Marti Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -51. 0% for MRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MRT or DKNG or KO or PEP or FLUT or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 11x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 122. 9x for DraftKings Inc. — 108. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MRT: 88. 2% to $3. 20.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MRT or DKNG or KO or PEP or FLUT or JPM?

In this comparison, PEP (3.

9% yield), KO (2. 5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. MRT, DKNG, FLUT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MRT or DKNG or KO or PEP or FLUT or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, FLUT: -8. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MRT and DKNG and KO and PEP and FLUT and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (MRT (Technology) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and PEP (Consumer Defensive) and FLUT (Consumer Cyclical) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MRT is a small-cap high-growth stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; PEP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. KO, PEP, JPM pay a dividend while MRT, DKNG, FLUT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.