Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MYFW vs NBTB vs CVBF vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
MYFW vs NBTB vs CVBF vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $297M | $2.52B | $2.88B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $186M | $902M | $644M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $169M | $209M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 52.5% | 73.6% | 79.7% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 24.3% | 43.7% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 12.9x | 11.5x | 14.7x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $108M | $327M | $991M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $185M | $108M | $10.27B |
MYFW vs NBTB vs CVBF vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Western Finan… (MYFW) | 100 | 214.2 | +114.2% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MYFW vs NBTB vs CVBF vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MYFW has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 4.8%, EPS growth 54.0%
- Beta 0.75 vs CVBF's 0.81, lower leverage
- +46.7% vs CVBF's +16.3%
NBTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- PEG 1.64 vs CVBF's 4.64
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.0%, current ratio 1.60x
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and dividends.
- 32.5% margin vs MYFW's 7.1%
- 3.8% yield, vs KO's 2.5%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 108.5%
- 13.1% ROA vs MYFW's 0.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 25.3x), PEG 1.64 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.5% margin vs MYFW's 7.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs CVBF's 0.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.7% vs CVBF's +16.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs MYFW's 0.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.7% |
MYFW vs NBTB vs CVBF vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MYFW vs NBTB vs CVBF vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • KO leads 1 • MYFW leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 264.5x MYFW's $186M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MYFW's 7.1%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $186M | $902M | $644M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $20M | $241M | $294M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $169M | $209M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $225M | $217M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.5% | +73.6% | +79.7% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +24.3% | +43.7% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +18.8% | +32.5% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +24.9% | +33.7% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.9% | +39.5% | +11.1% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.0x trailing earnings, CVBF trades at a 49% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 2.06x vs CVBF's 4.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $297M | $2.5B | $2.9B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $395M | $2.7B | $3.8B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.78x | 14.47x | 13.97x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.88x | 11.54x | 14.74x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.06x | 4.40x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.70x | 11.03x | 13.37x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.59x | 2.90x | 4.48x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.14x | 1.29x | 1.26x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.49x | 13.26x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $5 for MYFW. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs MYFW's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | +9.5% | +9.3% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +1.1% | +1.4% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +7.9% | +6.8% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +2.4% | +9.3% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.17x | 0.43x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $98M | $142M | $883M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $185M | $108M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $108M | $327M | $991M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.21x | 1.05x | 2.12x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — MYFW and KO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,465 for MYFW. Over the past 12 months, MYFW leads with a +46.7% total return vs CVBF's +16.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MYFW at 18.6% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.6% | +17.6% | +14.8% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.7% | +18.3% | +16.3% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.8% | +48.5% | +64.4% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.6% | +44.4% | +15.2% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.0% | +108.5% | +66.9% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.6% | +14.1% | +18.0% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVBF's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.76x | 0.81x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.08 | $48.27 | $21.48 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.29 | $39.20 | $17.95 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +99.8% | +98.8% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.3 | 63.1 | 60.1 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 33K | 266K | 1.6M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVBF and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MYFW as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs -11.6% for MYFW (target: $27). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs MYFW's 0.19%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | $46.00 | $24.75 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 10 | 16 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +3.0% | +3.8% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 13 | 0 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | $1.43 | $0.82 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.4% | +2.8% | +0.2% |
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). NBTB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
MYFW vs NBTB vs CVBF vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MYFW or NBTB or CVBF or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (14. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Western Financial, Inc. (MYFW) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MYFW or NBTB or CVBF or KO?
On trailing P/E, CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the cheapest at 14. 0x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 64x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MYFW or NBTB or CVBF or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to +14. 6% for First Western Financial, Inc. (MYFW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus MYFW's +55. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MYFW or NBTB or CVBF or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 0. 81β — meaning CVBF is approximately -507% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MYFW or NBTB or CVBF or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Western Financial, Inc. grew EPS 54. 0% year-over-year, compared to 5. 6% for CVB Financial Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MYFW or NBTB or CVBF or KO?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 7. 1% for First Western Financial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 9. 7% for MYFW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MYFW or NBTB or CVBF or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 64x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 13. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 16. 6% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — MYFW or NBTB or CVBF or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 0. 2% for First Western Financial, Inc. (MYFW).
09Is MYFW or NBTB or CVBF or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, MYFW: +55. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MYFW and NBTB and CVBF and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (MYFW (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and CVBF (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MYFW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. NBTB, CVBF, KO pay a dividend while MYFW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.