Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
NAK logo
NAK
SCCO logo
SCCO
JPM logo
JPM
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NAK vs SCCO vs JPM vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NAK
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$1.14B
5Y Perf.+42.7%
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation

Copper

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$156.78B
5Y Perf.+401.3%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%

NAK vs SCCO vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NAK logoNAK
SCCO logoSCCO
JPM logoJPM
KO logoKO
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsCopperBanks - DiversifiedBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$1.14B$156.78B$896.00B$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$13.42B$280.33B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$-40M$4.33B$57.05B$13.70B
Gross Margin56.7%60.0%61.7%
Operating Margin52.2%25.9%29.3%
Forward P/E26.2x14.4x25.3x
Total Debt$3M$7.41B$942.38B$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$55M$4.30B$343.34B$10.27B

NAK vs SCCO vs JPM vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NAK
SCCO
JPM
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Northern Dynasty Mi… (NAK)100142.7+42.7%
Southern Copper Cor… (SCCO)100501.3+401.3%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NAK vs SCCO vs JPM vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SCCO leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. NAK and KO also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇SCCO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
NAK
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
The Growth Leader

NAK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 43.8% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
Best for: growth
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation
The Growth Play

SCCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 17.4%, EPS growth 24.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
  • 7.6% 10Y total return vs NAK's 5.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.31, Low D/E 66.8%, current ratio 3.89x
  • Beta 2.31, yield 1.6%, current ratio 3.89x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.26
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
  • Beta 0.94 vs NAK's 2.42
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Pick

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.

  • 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs SCCO's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNAK logoNAK43.8% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsSCCO logoSCCO32.3% margin vs NAK's -0.3%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.94 vs NAK's 2.42
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs SCCO's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SCCO logoSCCO+104.8% vs KO's +17.2%
Efficiency (ROA)SCCO logoSCCO21.4% ROA vs NAK's -32.3%, ROIC 38.6% vs -68.7%

NAK vs SCCO vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Critical Minerals Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Critical Minerals Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
NAKNorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

SCCOSouthern Copper Corporation
FY 2025
Copper
74.8%$10.0B
Molybdenum
10.5%$1.4B
Silver
7.3%$974M
Zinc
3.9%$530M
Other
3.6%$477M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

NAK vs SCCO vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSCCOLAGGINGNAK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SCCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and NAK operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. SCCO is the more profitable business, keeping 32.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JPM's 20.4%. On growth, SCCO holds the edge at +39.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$13.4B$280.3B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$22M$7.9B$81.4B$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$40M$4.3B$57.0B$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$23M$3.4B$100.9B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+56.7%+60.0%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+52.2%+25.9%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+32.3%+20.4%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+25.5%+36.0%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+39.0%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+146.8%+54.5%+16.0%+18.2%
SCCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 56% valuation discount to SCCO's 36.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$1.1B$156.8B$896.0B$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.1B$159.9B$1.50T$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-15.01x36.22x16.00x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.26.16x14.40x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.73x0.90x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.32x18.36x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue11.68x3.20x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share88.49x14.33x2.47x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF45.75x8.88x67.15x
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SCCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SCCO delivers a 42.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-99 for NAK. NAK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCCO scores 8/9 vs NAK's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-98.8%+42.0%+15.9%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-32.3%+21.4%+1.3%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-68.7%+38.6%+4.5%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-40.1%+39.2%+8.9%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92857
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.18x0.67x2.60x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$52M$3.1B$599.0B$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$55M$4.3B$343.3B$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3M$7.4B$942.4B$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-74.40x19.33x0.74x10.70x
SCCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — NAK and SCCO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NAK five years ago would be worth $37,004 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,560 for KO. Over the past 12 months, SCCO leads with a +104.8% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NAK at 110.7% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+4.6%+29.7%-0.5%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+65.9%+104.8%+21.8%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+834.9%+197.7%+138.2%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+270.0%+230.7%+118.2%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+514.1%+762.4%+465.8%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+110.7%+43.8%+33.6%+13.7%
Evenly matched — NAK and SCCO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NAK's 2.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs NAK's 68.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.42x2.31x0.94x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.98$223.89$337.25$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.73$87.84$262.71$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+68.5%+84.8%+95.1%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.449.959.160.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded7.9M1.3M7.0M12.7M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NAK as "Buy", SCCO as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -36.3% for NAK (target: $1). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs SCCO's 1.56%.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$1.30$156.17$339.75$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts5306148
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.6%+1.9%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11556
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.96$5.95$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.9%+0.2%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SCCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KO leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallSouthern Copper Corporation (SCCO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NAK vs SCCO vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NAK or SCCO or JPM or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the stronger pick with 17.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NAK or SCCO or JPM or KO?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Southern Copper Corporation at 36. 2x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NAK or SCCO or JPM or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

(NAK) delivered a total return of +270. 0%, compared to +65. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCCO returned +762. 4% versus KO's +121. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NAK or SCCO or JPM or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. 's 2. 42β — meaning NAK is approximately -1310% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NAK or SCCO or JPM or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is pulling ahead at 17.

4% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern Copper Corporation grew EPS 24. 5% year-over-year, compared to -182. 7% for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SCCO leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NAK or SCCO or JPM or KO?

Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.

3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus 0. 0% for NAK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NAK or SCCO or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 26. 2x for Southern Copper Corporation — 11. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NAK or SCCO or JPM or KO?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), SCCO (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. NAK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NAK or SCCO or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, NAK: +514. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NAK and SCCO and JPM and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (NAK (Basic Materials) and SCCO (Basic Materials) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NAK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. SCCO, JPM, KO pay a dividend while NAK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.