Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
NBN vs FUNC vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
NBN vs FUNC vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $1.04B | $272M | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $355M | $120M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $87M | $25M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 58.4% | 70.3% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 36.3% | 27.2% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 9.7x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $339M | $115M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $414M | $132M | $343.34B |
NBN vs FUNC vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northeast Bank (NBN) | 100 | 740.3 | +640.3% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 313.9 | +213.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NBN vs FUNC vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NBN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 34.7%, EPS growth 33.0%
- 11.4% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- PEG 0.34 vs JPM's 0.81
FUNC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 2.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, Low D/E 56.4%, current ratio 0.09x
- Beta 0.67, yield 2.2%, current ratio 0.09x
JPM plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.7% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.74 vs 0.81 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs FUNC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs NBN's 1.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.3% vs JPM's +21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs FUNC's 0.4% |
NBN vs FUNC vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NBN vs FUNC vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NBN and FUNC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 2345.8x FUNC's $120M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 24.5% (NBN) to 20.4% (JPM).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $355M | $120M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $131M | $35M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $87M | $25M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | $16M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.4% | +70.3% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.3% | +27.2% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | +20.5% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +13.1% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.9% | +20.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 31% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBN offers better value at 0.40x vs JPM's 0.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $272M | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $962M | $255M | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.89x | 11.11x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.74x | 9.66x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.40x | 0.85x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.47x | 7.85x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.95x | 2.28x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.18x | 1.34x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.40x | 17.67x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBN delivers a 17.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $13 for FUNC. FUNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FUNC scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.3% | +12.6% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +1.2% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.0% | +7.1% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.8% | +9.8% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.69x | 0.56x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$74M | -$17M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $414M | $132M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $339M | $115M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.91x | 0.99x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NBN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBN five years ago would be worth $44,064 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21,820 for JPM. Over the past 12 months, NBN leads with a +52.3% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NBN at 47.2% vs JPM's 33.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.3% | +14.3% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.3% | +44.4% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +219.1% | +192.2% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +340.6% | +141.9% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1136.4% | +361.3% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.2% | +43.0% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
FUNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FUNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBN's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FUNC currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.03x | 0.67x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $135.62 | $42.35 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.45 | $28.00 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.8% | +98.9% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.9 | 71.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 123K | 13K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FUNC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBN as "Buy", FUNC as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.6% upside for NBN (target: $145) vs -40.3% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, FUNC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.19% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $145.00 | $25.00 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 1 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | +2.2% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | $0.92 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
FUNC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). NBN leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
NBN vs FUNC vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NBN or FUNC or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northeast Bank (NBN) is the stronger pick with 34.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northeast Bank (NBN) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NBN or FUNC or JPM?
On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 11.
1x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Northeast Bank wins at 0. 34x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NBN or FUNC or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Northeast Bank (NBN) delivered a total return of +340.
6%, compared to +118. 2% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBN returned +1136% versus FUNC's +361. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NBN or FUNC or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First United Corporation (FUNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus Northeast Bank's 1. 03β — meaning NBN is approximately 54% more volatile than FUNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First United Corporation (FUNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NBN or FUNC or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northeast Bank (NBN) is pulling ahead at 34.
7% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Northeast Bank grew EPS 33. 0% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NBN or FUNC or JPM?
Northeast Bank (NBN) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
8% net margin versus 20. 4% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — meaning it keeps 23. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBN leads at 35. 8% versus 26. 0% for JPM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NBN or FUNC or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Northeast Bank (NBN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 34x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBN: 11. 6% to $145. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NBN or FUNC or JPM?
In this comparison, FUNC (2.
2% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. NBN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NBN or FUNC or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 2. 2% yield, +361. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +361. 3%, NBN: +1136%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NBN and FUNC and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NBN is a small-cap high-growth stock; FUNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. FUNC, JPM pay a dividend while NBN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.