Chemicals - Specialty
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
NGVT vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN vs AVNT vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals
Chemicals
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
Banks - Diversified
NGVT vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN vs AVNT vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $2.54B | $615M | $1.28B | $3.30B | $3.46B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.21B | $1.55B | $2.92B | $1.08B | $3.28B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-128M | $10M | $-359M | $82M | $158M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 39.3% | 7.4% | 5.8% | 22.6% | 31.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 22.8% | 0.7% | -4.8% | 10.6% | 9.4% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 14.6x | 15.9x | — | 40.2x | 12.3x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.24B | $383M | $3.59B | $261M | $1.92B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $78M | $20M | $211M | $4M | $511M | $343.34B |
NGVT vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN vs AVNT vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingevity Corporation (NGVT) | 100 | 136.9 | +36.9% |
| AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) | 100 | 194.3 | +94.3% |
| Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) | 100 | 111.2 | +11.2% |
| Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN) | 100 | 743.7 | +643.7% |
| Avient Corporation (AVNT) | 100 | 144.0 | +44.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NGVT vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN vs AVNT vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NGVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +66.6% vs ASIX's -4.2%
ASIX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.59, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.59, Low D/E 46.9%, current ratio 1.13x
- Beta 0.59 vs TROX's 2.33, lower leverage
TROX is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.33, yield 3.8%, current ratio 2.46x
- 3.8% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
HWKN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 11.2%, EPS growth -3.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 6.5% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- 11.2% revenue growth vs NGVT's -17.0%
- 8.3% ROA vs TROX's -7.7%, ROIC 12.3% vs -0.3%
AVNT doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.81 vs ASIX's 8.46
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 40.2x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.65
- 20.4% margin vs TROX's -12.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.2% revenue growth vs NGVT's -17.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 40.2x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.65 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs TROX's -12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.59 vs TROX's 2.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.6% vs ASIX's -4.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs TROX's -7.7%, ROIC 12.3% vs -0.3% |
NGVT vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN vs AVNT vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NGVT vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN vs AVNT vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HWKN leads in 2 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • ASIX leads 1 • NGVT leads 0 • TROX leads 0 • AVNT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 258.7x HWKN's $1.1B. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TROX's -12.3%. On growth, HWKN holds the edge at +8.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $1.5B | $2.9B | $1.1B | $3.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $378M | $93M | $166M | $168M | $495M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$128M | $10M | -$359M | $82M | $158M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $246M | -$22M | -$275M | $86M | $205M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.3% | +7.4% | +5.8% | +22.6% | +31.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +0.7% | -4.8% | +10.6% | +9.4% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.6% | +0.7% | -12.3% | +7.5% | +4.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | -1.4% | -9.4% | +7.9% | +6.3% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.2% | +7.0% | +3.0% | +8.4% | +2.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +196.4% | -167.4% | +7.1% | -5.1% | +3.8% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ASIX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.7x trailing earnings, ASIX trades at a 70% valuation discount to AVNT's 42.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs ASIX's 6.74x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $615M | $1.3B | $3.3B | $3.5B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $978M | $4.7B | $3.6B | $4.9B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -15.61x | 12.67x | -2.70x | 40.50x | 42.43x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.60x | 15.90x | — | 40.24x | 12.27x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 6.74x | — | 2.67x | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.05x | 6.64x | 16.58x | 21.24x | 12.52x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.17x | 0.40x | 0.44x | 3.05x | 1.06x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 87.73x | 0.76x | 0.88x | 6.19x | 1.45x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.27x | 95.81x | — | 38.38x | 17.76x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HWKN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HWKN delivers a 16.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-156 for NGVT. ASIX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NGVT's 41.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NGVT scores 6/9 vs TROX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -156.1% | +1.3% | -30.4% | +16.0% | +6.6% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.3% | +0.6% | -7.7% | +8.3% | +2.6% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.2% | +4.4% | -0.3% | +12.3% | +3.9% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.1% | +5.3% | -0.4% | +14.8% | +4.0% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 41.84x | 0.47x | 2.48x | 0.49x | 0.81x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $363M | $3.4B | $258M | $1.4B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $78M | $20M | $211M | $4M | $511M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $383M | $3.6B | $261M | $1.9B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.86x | 1.38x | -1.16x | 8.52x | 5.06x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HWKN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HWKN five years ago would be worth $49,717 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,471 for TROX. Over the past 12 months, NGVT leads with a +66.6% total return vs ASIX's -4.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HWKN at 47.3% vs ASIX's -11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.8% | +34.3% | +90.4% | +9.3% | +19.9% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +66.6% | -4.2% | +42.1% | +19.6% | +8.8% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.4% | -30.0% | -23.6% | +219.5% | +3.9% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.8% | -12.7% | -55.3% | +397.2% | -14.7% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +111.0% | +54.4% | +134.4% | +649.5% | +23.5% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.1% | -11.2% | -8.6% | +47.3% | +1.3% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ASIX and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ASIX is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TROX's 2.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs TROX's 75.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 0.59x | 2.33x | 0.97x | 1.16x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $79.05 | $26.73 | $10.59 | $186.15 | $44.85 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.74 | $14.10 | $2.86 | $117.98 | $27.48 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.1% | +85.3% | +75.8% | +85.1% | +84.2% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.7 | 42.7 | 45.9 | 49.7 | 57.0 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 211K | 269K | 2.6M | 144K | 600K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TROX and HWKN and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NGVT as "Buy", ASIX as "Buy", TROX as "Buy", HWKN as "Buy", AVNT as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.7% upside for AVNT (target: $47) vs -3.6% for ASIX (target: $22). For income investors, TROX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.77% vs HWKN's 0.47%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $76.67 | $22.00 | $8.33 | — | $46.71 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 6 | 17 | 1 | 20 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% | +3.8% | +0.5% | +2.9% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 15 | 14 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.63 | $0.30 | $0.75 | $1.08 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +3.9% |
HWKN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). JPM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
NGVT vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN vs AVNT vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NGVT or ASIX or TROX or HWKN or AVNT or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) is the stronger pick with 11. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 0% for Ingevity Corporation (NGVT). AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ingevity Corporation (NGVT) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NGVT or ASIX or TROX or HWKN or AVNT or JPM?
On trailing P/E, AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the cheapest at 12. 7x versus Avient Corporation at 42. 4x. On forward P/E, Avient Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus AdvanSix Inc. 's 8. 46x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NGVT or ASIX or TROX or HWKN or AVNT or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) delivered a total return of +397. 2%, compared to -55. 3% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWKN returned +649. 5% versus AVNT's +23. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NGVT or ASIX or TROX or HWKN or AVNT or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 59β versus Tronox Holdings plc's 2. 33β — meaning TROX is approximately 297% more volatile than ASIX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 42% for Ingevity Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NGVT or ASIX or TROX or HWKN or AVNT or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) is pulling ahead at 11. 2% versus -17. 0% for Ingevity Corporation (NGVT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ingevity Corporation grew EPS 61. 1% year-over-year, compared to -890. 0% for Tronox Holdings plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, HWKN leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NGVT or ASIX or TROX or HWKN or AVNT or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -16. 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -0. 7% for TROX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NGVT or ASIX or TROX or HWKN or AVNT or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus AdvanSix Inc. 's 8. 46x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Avient Corporation (AVNT) trades at 12. 3x forward P/E versus 40. 2x for Hawkins, Inc. — 28. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVNT: 23. 7% to $46. 71.
08Which pays a better dividend — NGVT or ASIX or TROX or HWKN or AVNT or JPM?
In this comparison, TROX (3.
8% yield), AVNT (2. 9% yield), ASIX (2. 8% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), HWKN (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. NGVT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NGVT or ASIX or TROX or HWKN or AVNT or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 59), 2. 8% yield). Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) carries a higher beta of 2. 33 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASIX: +54. 4%, TROX: +134. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NGVT and ASIX and TROX and HWKN and AVNT and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (NGVT (Basic Materials) and ASIX (Basic Materials) and TROX (Basic Materials) and HWKN (Basic Materials) and AVNT (Basic Materials) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NGVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASIX is a small-cap deep-value stock; TROX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HWKN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AVNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. ASIX, TROX, AVNT, JPM pay a dividend while NGVT, HWKN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.