Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PASG vs KRYS vs RCKT vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Banks - Diversified
PASG vs KRYS vs RCKT vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $18M | $10.26B | $366M | $908.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $417M | $0.00 | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $225M | $-209M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | — | 92.8% | — | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 42.8% | — | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 44.9x | — | 14.6x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $9M | $25M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $46M | $496M | $78M | $343.34B |
PASG vs KRYS vs RCKT vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG) | 100 | 1.0 | -99.0% |
| Krystal Biotech, In… (KRYS) | 100 | 840.3 | +740.3% |
| Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT) | 100 | 16.0 | -84.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PASG vs KRYS vs RCKT vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PASG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 39.6% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3%
KRYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 33.9%, EPS growth 128.0%
- 31.7% 10Y total return vs JPM's 481.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 9.95x
- Beta 0.89, current ratio 9.95x
RCKT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 1.8%
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.87 vs PASG's 3.30
- 1.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.6% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 53.9% margin vs RCKT's 2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs PASG's 3.30 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.5% vs PASG's -28.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.6% ROA vs PASG's -59.8%, ROIC 18.0% vs -141.9% |
PASG vs KRYS vs RCKT vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PASG vs KRYS vs RCKT vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KRYS leads in 3 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • PASG leads 0 • RCKT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRYS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and RCKT operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KRYS is the more profitable business, keeping 53.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JPM's 20.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $417M | $0 | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$41M | $185M | -$206M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$38M | $225M | -$209M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | $237M | -$180M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +92.8% | — | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +42.8% | — | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +53.9% | — | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +56.9% | — | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +31.9% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.4% | +52.5% | +25.0% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.2x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 68% valuation discount to KRYS's 50.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JPM's 18.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KRYS's 58.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $10.3B | $366M | $908.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | $9.8B | $313M | $1.51T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.39x | 50.89x | -1.67x | 16.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.90x | — | 14.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 58.23x | — | 18.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 26.37x | — | 3.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 8.55x | 1.34x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 54.31x | — | 9.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KRYS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KRYS delivers a 19.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-151 for PASG. KRYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KRYS scores 5/9 vs RCKT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -150.9% | +19.3% | -70.8% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -59.8% | +17.6% | -59.6% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -141.9% | +18.0% | -62.4% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -70.6% | +14.8% | -58.1% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.28x | 0.01x | 0.09x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$22M | -$487M | -$53M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $46M | $496M | $78M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $9M | $25M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -43.58x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KRYS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KRYS five years ago would be worth $53,302 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $195 for PASG. Over the past 12 months, KRYS leads with a +163.5% total return vs PASG's -28.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRYS at 40.8% vs RCKT's -47.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -52.2% | +41.0% | -3.2% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.4% | +163.5% | +18.4% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.8% | +179.0% | -85.2% | +138.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | +433.0% | -92.2% | +135.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | +3171.2% | -89.0% | +481.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.9% | +40.8% | -47.1% | +33.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KRYS and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PASG's 3.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRYS currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs PASG's 28.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.30x | 0.89x | 1.94x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.00 | $356.50 | $5.45 | $338.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.94 | $127.99 | $2.40 | $269.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.0% | +97.6% | +61.5% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.6 | 71.4 | 55.3 | 72.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 86K | 276K | 2.4M | 7.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KRYS as "Buy", RCKT as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.3% upside for RCKT (target: $5) vs -3.3% for KRYS (target: $336). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.83% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $336.40 | $5.00 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 | 19 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.8% |
KRYS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PASG vs KRYS vs RCKT vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PASG or KRYS or RCKT or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (14. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PASG or KRYS or RCKT or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 2x versus Krystal Biotech, Inc. at 50. 9x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PASG or KRYS or RCKT or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) delivered a total return of +433. 0%, compared to -98. 1% for Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRYS returned +31. 7% versus PASG's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PASG or KRYS or RCKT or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Passage Bio, Inc. 's 3. 30β — meaning PASG is approximately 280% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PASG or KRYS or RCKT or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Krystal Biotech, Inc. grew EPS 128. 0% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PASG or KRYS or RCKT or JPM?
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the more profitable company, earning 52. 6% net margin versus 0. 0% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 52. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRYS leads at 41. 5% versus 0. 0% for RCKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRYS leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PASG or KRYS or RCKT or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) trades at 14. 6x forward P/E versus 44. 9x for Krystal Biotech, Inc. — 30. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RCKT: 49. 3% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PASG or KRYS or RCKT or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. PASG, KRYS, RCKT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PASG or KRYS or RCKT or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 1. 8% yield, +481. 2% 10Y return). Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG) carries a higher beta of 3. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +481. 2%, PASG: -98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PASG and KRYS and RCKT and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (PASG (Healthcare) and KRYS (Healthcare) and RCKT (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PASG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KRYS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RCKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while PASG, KRYS, RCKT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.