Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PEBO vs CIVB vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
PEBO vs CIVB vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $1.31B | $564M | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $593M | $253M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $107M | $46M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 66.0% | 66.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 21.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 9.6x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $734M | $284M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $189M | $77M | $10.27B |
PEBO vs CIVB vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peoples Bancorp Inc. (PEBO) | 100 | 172.0 | +72.0% |
| Civista Bancshares,… (CIVB) | 100 | 176.7 | +76.7% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PEBO vs CIVB vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PEBO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 4.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, Low D/E 60.9%, current ratio 0.84x
- PEG 0.92 vs KO's 2.26
CIVB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth 31.3%
- 166.6% 10Y total return vs PEBO's 132.4%
- 5.4% NII/revenue growth vs PEBO's 0.4%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 27.8% margin vs PEBO's 18.0%
- 13.1% ROA vs CIVB's 1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 5.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.4% NII/revenue growth vs PEBO's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.92 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs PEBO's 18.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs CIVB's 0.72 | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.8% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs CIVB's 1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 5.0% |
PEBO vs CIVB vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PEBO vs CIVB vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 195.1x CIVB's $253M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PEBO's 18.0%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $593M | $253M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $121M | $56M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $107M | $46M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $122M | $17M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.0% | +66.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +21.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +18.3% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.6% | +6.5% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.1% | -3.2% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PEBO leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, CIVB trades at a 62% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PEBO offers better value at 1.06x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $564M | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $771M | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.24x | 10.31x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.68x | 9.63x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.06x | 1.81x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.80x | 13.95x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.13x | 2.21x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.07x | 0.88x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.21x | 12.77x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $9 for PEBO. CIVB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.52x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs PEBO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.1% | +10.0% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.1% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +5.0% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +2.3% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 0.52x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $545M | $207M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $189M | $77M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $734M | $284M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.72x | 0.67x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CIVB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,319 for CIVB. Over the past 12 months, PEBO leads with a +27.8% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIVB at 21.6% vs PEBO's 13.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.1% | +26.0% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.8% | +22.3% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.6% | +79.6% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.6% | +33.2% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.4% | +166.6% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.6% | +21.6% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PEBO and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIVB's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PEBO currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs CIVB's 96.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.72x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.64 | $28.31 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.49 | $18.95 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +96.1% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.0 | 66.4 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 225K | 78K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PEBO and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PEBO as "Hold", CIVB as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.2% upside for KO (target: $86) vs -0.8% for CIVB (target: $27). For income investors, PEBO offers the higher dividend yield at 4.49% vs KO's 2.46%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.00 | $27.00 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 8 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | +2.5% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 14 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.64 | $0.68 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.0% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PEBO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PEBO vs CIVB vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PEBO or CIVB or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civista Bancshares, Inc.
(CIVB) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for Peoples Bancorp Inc. (PEBO). Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CIVB) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CIVB) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PEBO or CIVB or KO?
On trailing P/E, Civista Bancshares, Inc.
(CIVB) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Civista Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Peoples Bancorp Inc. wins at 0. 92x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PEBO or CIVB or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to +33. 2% for Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CIVB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIVB returned +166. 6% versus KO's +121. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PEBO or CIVB or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Civista Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 72β — meaning CIVB is approximately -461% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CIVB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PEBO or CIVB or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civista Bancshares, Inc.
(CIVB) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus 0. 4% for Peoples Bancorp Inc. (PEBO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Civista Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 31. 3% year-over-year, compared to -9. 7% for Peoples Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PEBO or CIVB or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 17. 3% for Peoples Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 21. 7% for CIVB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PEBO leads at 67. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PEBO or CIVB or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Peoples Bancorp Inc. (PEBO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CIVB) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 4. 2% to $86. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — PEBO or CIVB or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Peoples Bancorp Inc. (PEBO) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 2. 5% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO).
09Is PEBO or CIVB or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, CIVB: +166. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PEBO and CIVB and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (PEBO (Financial Services) and CIVB (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PEBO is a small-cap deep-value stock; CIVB is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.