Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PEBO vs FISV vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Banks - Diversified
PEBO vs FISV vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $1.31B | $28.76B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $593M | $21.09B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $107M | $3.20B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 66.0% | 60.8% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 24.4% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 6.6x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $734M | $29.12B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $189M | $798M | $343.34B |
PEBO vs FISV vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peoples Bancorp Inc. (PEBO) | 100 | 172.0 | +72.0% |
| Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) | 100 | 55.1 | -44.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PEBO vs FISV vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PEBO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 4.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, Low D/E 60.9%, current ratio 0.84x
- Beta 0.63, yield 4.5%, current ratio 0.84x
FISV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 17.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- PEG 0.19 vs PEBO's 0.92
- 3.6% revenue growth vs PEBO's 0.4%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs PEBO's 132.4%
- 20.4% margin vs FISV's 15.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs PEBO's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.19 vs 0.81 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs FISV's 15.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.8% vs FISV's -68.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.0% ROA vs PEBO's 1.1%, ROIC 8.1% vs 5.8% |
PEBO vs FISV vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PEBO vs FISV vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 473.0x PEBO's $593M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FISV's 15.2%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $593M | $21.1B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $121M | $7.5B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $107M | $3.2B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $122M | $4.0B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.0% | +60.8% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +24.4% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +15.2% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.6% | +19.0% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.1% | -29.1% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FISV leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, FISV trades at a 47% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISV offers better value at 0.24x vs PEBO's 1.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $28.8B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $57.1B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.24x | 8.48x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.68x | 6.62x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.06x | 0.24x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.80x | 6.44x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.13x | 1.36x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.07x | 1.14x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.21x | 6.63x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FISV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $9 for PEBO. PEBO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FISV scores 5/9 vs PEBO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.1% | +12.4% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +4.0% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +8.1% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +10.2% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 1.13x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $545M | $28.3B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $189M | $798M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $734M | $29.1B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.72x | 6.39x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,929 for FISV. Over the past 12 months, PEBO leads with a +27.8% total return vs FISV's -68.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FISV's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.1% | -18.0% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.8% | -68.0% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.6% | -54.3% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.6% | -50.7% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.4% | +1.8% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.6% | -23.0% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
PEBO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PEBO is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PEBO currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 30.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.87x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.64 | $177.36 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.49 | $51.78 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +30.3% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.0 | 40.8 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 225K | 5.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PEBO and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PEBO as "Hold", FISV as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.3% upside for FISV (target: $71) vs 3.8% for PEBO (target: $38). For income investors, PEBO offers the higher dividend yield at 4.49% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.00 | $71.15 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 60 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.64 | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +20.5% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FISV leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
PEBO vs FISV vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PEBO or FISV or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for Peoples Bancorp Inc. (PEBO). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) a "Buy" — based on 60 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PEBO or FISV or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, Fiserv, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus Peoples Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 92x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PEBO or FISV or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -50. 7% for Fiserv, Inc. (FISV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FISV's +1. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PEBO or FISV or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Peoples Bancorp Inc.
(PEBO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 50% more volatile than PEBO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Peoples Bancorp Inc. (PEBO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PEBO or FISV or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus 0. 4% for Peoples Bancorp Inc. (PEBO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fiserv, Inc. grew EPS 17. 8% year-over-year, compared to -9. 7% for Peoples Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PEBO or FISV or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 16. 4% for Fiserv, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FISV leads at 26. 9% versus 21. 8% for PEBO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PEBO leads at 67. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PEBO or FISV or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Peoples Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 92x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 7. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FISV: 32. 3% to $71. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — PEBO or FISV or JPM?
In this comparison, PEBO (4.
5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. FISV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PEBO or FISV or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Peoples Bancorp Inc.
(PEBO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 4. 5% yield, +132. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PEBO: +132. 4%, FISV: +1. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PEBO and FISV and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (PEBO (Financial Services) and FISV (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
PEBO, JPM pay a dividend while FISV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.