Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PNBK vs NECB vs CZWI vs KO vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
PNBK vs NECB vs CZWI vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $114M | $359M | $207M | $355.61B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $61M | $156M | $90M | $49.28B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $44M | $14M | $13.70B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 53.5% | 65.9% | 54.7% | 61.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -19.1% | 39.8% | 7.0% | 29.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 0.7x | 8.3x | 11.8x | 25.3x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $75M | $52M | $45.49B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $186M | $81M | $119M | $10.27B | $343.34B |
PNBK vs NECB vs CZWI vs KO vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patriot National Ba… (PNBK) | 100 | 16.4 | -83.6% |
| Northeast Community… (NECB) | 100 | 438.1 | +338.1% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PNBK vs NECB vs CZWI vs KO vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PNBK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (0.7x vs 14.4x)
NECB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.71, yield 3.8%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- PEG 0.25 vs CZWI's 2.32
- NIM 4.9% vs PNBK's 1.7%
CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50 vs PNBK's 1.46
- +52.1% vs PNBK's -11.8%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- 13.1% ROA vs PNBK's -1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs -12.8%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.7x vs 14.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.4% margin vs PNBK's -19.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs PNBK's 1.46 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.1% vs PNBK's -11.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs PNBK's -1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs -12.8% |
PNBK vs NECB vs CZWI vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PNBK vs NECB vs CZWI vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NECB leads in 1 of 6 categories
PNBK leads 1 • KO leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • JPM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NECB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 4598.9x PNBK's $61M. NECB is the more profitable business, keeping 28.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PNBK's -19.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $61M | $156M | $90M | $49.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $63M | $9M | $15.5B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | $44M | $14M | $13.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $51M | $11M | $12.6B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.5% | +65.9% | +54.7% | +61.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.1% | +39.8% | +7.0% | +29.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.2% | +28.4% | +16.0% | +27.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -19.6% | +32.5% | +12.4% | +25.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | +6.8% | +63.0% | +18.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PNBK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.0x trailing earnings, NECB trades at a 71% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NECB offers better value at 0.24x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $114M | $359M | $207M | $355.6B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$56M | $353M | $140M | $390.8B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.06x | 7.99x | 14.70x | 27.18x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.68x | 8.30x | 11.79x | 25.27x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.24x | 2.90x | 2.43x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.57x | 15.69x | 26.39x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.96x | 2.28x | 2.29x | 7.42x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 1.01x | 1.11x | 10.40x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.07x | 19.90x | 67.15x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-14 for PNBK. PNBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs PNBK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.5% | +13.1% | +7.8% | +41.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | +2.2% | +0.8% | +13.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.8% | +12.5% | +2.0% | +15.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.1% | +16.2% | +0.6% | +17.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.21x | 0.28x | 1.33x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$170M | -$6M | -$67M | $35.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $186M | $81M | $119M | $10.3B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $75M | $52M | $45.5B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.42x | 1.17x | 0.16x | 10.70x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NECB five years ago would be worth $24,194 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,162 for PNBK. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs PNBK's -11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs PNBK's -49.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -41.9% | +15.9% | +24.3% | +20.3% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.8% | +17.5% | +52.1% | +17.2% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.8% | +98.4% | +153.7% | +47.0% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.4% | +141.9% | +69.0% | +65.6% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.1% | +500.4% | +149.0% | +121.1% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.0% | +25.6% | +36.4% | +13.7% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NECB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PNBK's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NECB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs PNBK's 48.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.46x | 0.71x | 0.50x | -0.20x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.00 | $26.02 | $22.62 | $84.04 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.86 | $19.27 | $12.83 | $65.35 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.5% | +99.8% | +94.9% | +98.3% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.9 | 67.0 | 51.2 | 60.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 276K | 33K | 41K | 12.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NECB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NECB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, NECB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.75% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $86.13 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 2 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.8% | +1.7% | +2.5% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 6 | 56 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.98 | $0.37 | $2.04 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +3.0% | +0.2% | +3.9% |
NECB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PNBK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PNBK vs NECB vs CZWI vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PNBK or NECB or CZWI or KO or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (8. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PNBK or NECB or CZWI or KO or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the cheapest at 8. 0x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 25x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PNBK or NECB or CZWI or KO or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) delivered a total return of +141. 9%, compared to -88. 4% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NECB returned +500. 4% versus PNBK's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PNBK or NECB or CZWI or KO or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning PNBK is approximately -832% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PNBK or NECB or CZWI or KO or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 98. 4% year-over-year, compared to -7. 7% for Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PNBK or NECB or CZWI or KO or JPM?
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 2% net margin versus -21. 9% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NECB leads at 39. 6% versus -21. 8% for PNBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NECB leads at 66. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PNBK or NECB or CZWI or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK) trades at 0. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 24. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — PNBK or NECB or CZWI or KO or JPM?
In this comparison, NECB (3.
8% yield), KO (2. 5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), CZWI (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. PNBK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PNBK or NECB or CZWI or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, PNBK: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PNBK and NECB and CZWI and KO and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (PNBK (Financial Services) and NECB (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PNBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NECB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. NECB, CZWI, KO, JPM pay a dividend while PNBK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.