Rental & Leasing Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PONY vs OUST vs MBLY vs INVZ vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Auto - Parts
Auto - Parts
Banks - Diversified
PONY vs OUST vs MBLY vs INVZ vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $2.87B | $2.53B | $7.61B | $137M | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $90M | $185M | $2.01B | $45M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-134M | $-56M | $-4.11B | $-81M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 15.7% | 49.0% | 48.3% | 9.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -289.8% | -37.4% | -209.5% | -178.8% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 33.7x | — | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $17M | $0.00 | $65M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $295M | $67M | $1.84B | $9M | $343.34B |
PONY vs OUST vs MBLY vs INVZ vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pony AI Inc. Americ… (PONY) | 100 | 62.6 | -37.4% |
| Ouster, Inc. (OUST) | 100 | 402.8 | +302.8% |
| Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY) | 100 | 51.7 | -48.3% |
| Innoviz Technologie… (INVZ) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 128.4 | +28.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PONY vs OUST vs MBLY vs INVZ vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PONY is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 3.32, Low D/E 0.9%, current ratio 13.67x
OUST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +104.3% vs MBLY's -41.2%
Among these 5 stocks, MBLY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
INVZ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 127.0%, EPS growth 40.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 109.1%
- 127.0% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs PONY's -32.1%
- Beta 0.94, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 127.0% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs MBLY's -204.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs OUST's 3.93 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs PONY's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +104.3% vs MBLY's -41.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs INVZ's -57.8%, ROIC 4.5% vs -46.9% |
PONY vs OUST vs MBLY vs INVZ vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PONY vs OUST vs MBLY vs INVZ vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 5 of 6 categories
OUST leads 1 • PONY leads 0 • MBLY leads 0 • INVZ leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 6253.0x INVZ's $45M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MBLY's -2.0%. On growth, OUST holds the edge at +48.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90M | $185M | $2.0B | $45M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$256M | -$60M | -$3.8B | -$74M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$134M | -$56M | -$4.1B | -$81M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$209M | -$69M | $482M | -$47M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +49.0% | +48.3% | +9.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | -37.4% | -2.1% | -178.8% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -148.5% | -30.1% | -2.0% | -181.5% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -37.4% | +23.9% | -105.2% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.3% | +48.9% | +27.4% | -59.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +110.8% | +33.3% | -35.0% | -76.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, JPM's 18.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MBLY's 74.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $2.5B | $7.6B | $137M | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $2.5B | $5.8B | $193M | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -23.29x | -37.20x | -19.46x | -1.82x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 33.74x | — | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 74.94x | — | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 31.83x | 14.96x | 4.02x | 2.48x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.81x | 8.57x | 0.64x | 1.59x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 14.54x | — | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-102 for INVZ. PONY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OUST scores 6/9 vs PONY's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.4% | -22.2% | -37.3% | -101.6% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.4% | -15.9% | -35.5% | -57.8% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -20.9% | -30.2% | -3.2% | -46.9% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.4% | -31.1% | -3.6% | -64.1% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.07x | — | 0.83x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$280M | -$50M | -$1.8B | $56M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $295M | $67M | $1.8B | $9M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $17M | $0 | $65M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | -46.35x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OUST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $621 for INVZ. Over the past 12 months, OUST leads with a +104.3% total return vs MBLY's -41.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OUST at 89.8% vs INVZ's -39.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -49.3% | +70.3% | -16.8% | -35.9% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.8% | +104.3% | -41.2% | -35.7% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | +583.8% | -76.6% | -78.3% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | -64.9% | -67.8% | -93.8% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | -59.0% | -67.8% | -93.7% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.1% | +89.8% | -38.4% | -39.9% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OUST's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs INVZ's 24.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.32x | 3.93x | 2.09x | 2.47x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.92 | $49.39 | $20.18 | $2.54 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.95 | $16.40 | $6.47 | $0.58 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.7% | +80.6% | +46.3% | +24.3% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 54.6 | 49.0 | 41.0 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.3M | 4.0M | 6.0M | 2.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PONY as "Buy", OUST as "Hold", MBLY as "Buy", INVZ as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 871.7% upside for INVZ (target: $6) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs PONY's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.00 | $56.00 | $13.32 | $6.00 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 9 | 26 | 5 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 1 | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | — | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.3% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). OUST leads in 1 (Total Returns).
PONY vs OUST vs MBLY vs INVZ vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PONY or OUST or MBLY or INVZ or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
(INVZ) is the stronger pick with 127. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares (PONY) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PONY or OUST or MBLY or INVZ or JPM?
On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
is actually cheaper at 14. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PONY or OUST or MBLY or INVZ or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -93. 8% for Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (INVZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus INVZ's -93. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PONY or OUST or MBLY or INVZ or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Ouster, Inc. 's 3. 93β — meaning OUST is approximately 316% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares (PONY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PONY or OUST or MBLY or INVZ or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Innoviz Technologies Ltd.
(INVZ) is pulling ahead at 127. 0% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mobileye Global Inc. grew EPS 87. 4% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INVZ leads at 109. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PONY or OUST or MBLY or INVZ or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -148. 9% for Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -289. 8% for PONY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PONY or OUST or MBLY or INVZ or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 33. 7x for Mobileye Global Inc. — 19. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INVZ: 871. 7% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PONY or OUST or MBLY or INVZ or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield), PONY (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. OUST, MBLY, INVZ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PONY or OUST or MBLY or INVZ or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Innoviz Technologies Ltd. (INVZ) carries a higher beta of 2. 47 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, INVZ: -93. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PONY and OUST and MBLY and INVZ and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (PONY (Industrials) and OUST (Technology) and MBLY (Consumer Cyclical) and INVZ (Consumer Cyclical) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PONY is a small-cap high-growth stock; OUST is a small-cap high-growth stock; MBLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INVZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while PONY, OUST, MBLY, INVZ do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.