Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PTRN vs SPWH vs AMZN vs WMT vs JPM vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Discount Stores
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
PTRN vs SPWH vs AMZN vs WMT vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Discount Stores | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $2.97B | $50M | $2.65T | $964.73B | $925.11B | $345.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.73B | $1.22B | $742.78B | $725.30B | $280.33B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-141M | $-51M | $90.80B | $23.06B | $57.05B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 43.2% | 30.0% | 50.6% | 25.0% | 60.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | -1.1% | 11.5% | 4.2% | 25.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 34.7x | — | 28.0x | 41.7x | 14.9x | 24.6x |
| Total Debt | $31M | $427M | $152.99B | $67.09B | $942.38B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $289M | $2M | $86.81B | $10.73B | $343.34B | $10.27B |
PTRN vs SPWH vs AMZN vs WMT vs JPM vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sportsman's Warehou… (SPWH) | 100 | 9.0 | -91.0% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 178.3 | +78.3% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 303.1 | +203.1% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 352.1 | +252.1% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 179.7 | +79.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PTRN vs SPWH vs AMZN vs WMT vs JPM vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PTRN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 39.3% revenue growth vs SPWH's 1.0%
Among these 6 stocks, SPWH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.43, Low D/E 37.2%, current ratio 1.05x
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +29.4% vs SPWH's -66.4%
JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.8%
- 492.1% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 5.9%
- PEG 0.84 vs WMT's 3.79
- Beta 0.94, yield 1.8%, current ratio 0.52x
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 27.8% margin vs PTRN's -5.2%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- 13.1% ROA vs PTRN's -16.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.3% revenue growth vs SPWH's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.9x vs 24.6x), PEG 0.84 vs 2.20 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs PTRN's -5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs PTRN's 1.65 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.4% vs SPWH's -66.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs PTRN's -16.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.8% |
PTRN vs SPWH vs AMZN vs WMT vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PTRN vs SPWH vs AMZN vs WMT vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
SPWH leads 1 • PTRN leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • WMT leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 610.8x SPWH's $1.2B. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PTRN's -5.2%. On growth, PTRN holds the edge at +43.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $1.2B | $742.8B | $725.3B | $280.3B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $54M | $25M | $155.9B | $41.4B | $81.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$141M | -$51M | $90.8B | $23.1B | $57.0B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $99M | $13M | -$2.5B | $12.6B | $100.9B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.2% | +30.0% | +50.6% | +25.0% | +60.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | -1.1% | +11.5% | +4.2% | +25.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | -4.2% | +12.2% | +3.2% | +20.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +1.1% | -0.3% | +1.7% | +36.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.2% | +2.8% | +16.6% | +7.3% | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +80.0% | 0.0% | +74.8% | +19.6% | +16.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SPWH leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.5x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 63% valuation discount to WMT's 44.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.93x vs WMT's 4.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $50M | $2.65T | $964.7B | $925.1B | $345.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $475M | $2.71T | $1.02T | $1.52T | $380.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -21.54x | -0.98x | 34.31x | 44.33x | 16.52x | 26.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.70x | — | 27.98x | 41.67x | 14.87x | 24.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.23x | 4.03x | 0.93x | 2.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 64.31x | 18.87x | 18.61x | 23.19x | 18.72x | 25.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.19x | 0.04x | 3.69x | 1.35x | 3.31x | 7.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.82x | 0.26x | 6.48x | 9.14x | 2.55x | 10.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 37.66x | 5.62x | 343.80x | 64.65x | 9.17x | 65.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-26 for PTRN. PTRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs SPWH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -26.2% | -26.2% | +23.3% | +22.7% | +15.9% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.3% | -5.9% | +11.5% | +8.1% | +1.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | -1.6% | +14.7% | +14.4% | +4.5% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | -2.6% | +15.3% | +17.5% | +8.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 2.26x | 0.37x | 0.63x | 2.60x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$258M | $425M | $66.2B | $56.4B | $599.0B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $289M | $2M | $86.8B | $10.7B | $343.3B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $31M | $427M | $153.0B | $67.1B | $942.4B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -2.69x | 39.96x | 11.70x | 0.74x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — WMT and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $27,377 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $719 for SPWH. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +29.4% total return vs SPWH's -66.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 34.2% vs SPWH's -35.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +66.7% | -12.3% | +8.6% | +7.8% | +2.7% | +17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.6% | -66.4% | +13.8% | +29.4% | +24.7% | +16.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.6% | -73.5% | +96.0% | +138.6% | +141.8% | +39.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.6% | -92.8% | +44.1% | +173.8% | +126.7% | +64.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.6% | -84.0% | +585.6% | +441.3% | +492.1% | +115.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.0% | -35.8% | +25.2% | +33.6% | +34.2% | +11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JPM and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PTRN's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs SPWH's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.65x | 1.62x | 1.43x | -0.00x | 0.94x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.40 | $4.33 | $278.56 | $135.16 | $337.25 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.92 | $1.08 | $197.28 | $93.62 | $266.85 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.6% | +29.6% | +88.3% | +89.5% | +98.2% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.3 | 42.9 | 43.3 | 46.7 | 63.2 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 762K | 43.0M | 18.2M | 7.0M | 12.9M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PTRN as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.1% upside for AMZN (target: $308) vs 2.6% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.54% vs WMT's 0.77%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.50 | — | $307.77 | $139.44 | $339.75 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | — | 94 | 66 | 61 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.8% | +1.8% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 52 | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.94 | $5.95 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +0.8% | +3.7% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SPWH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PTRN vs SPWH vs AMZN vs WMT vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PTRN or SPWH or AMZN or WMT or JPM or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pattern Group Inc.
Series A Common Stock (PTRN) is the stronger pick with 39. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 5x trailing P/E (14. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock (PTRN) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PTRN or SPWH or AMZN or WMT or JPM or KO?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 5x versus Walmart Inc. at 44. 3x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 84x versus Walmart Inc. 's 3. 79x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PTRN or SPWH or AMZN or WMT or JPM or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +173. 8%, compared to -92. 8% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +585. 6% versus SPWH's -84. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PTRN or SPWH or AMZN or WMT or JPM or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock's 1. 65β — meaning PTRN is approximately -923% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock (PTRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PTRN or SPWH or AMZN or WMT or JPM or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pattern Group Inc.
Series A Common Stock (PTRN) is pulling ahead at 39. 3% versus 1. 0% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -49. 4% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PTRN or SPWH or AMZN or WMT or JPM or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -4. 1% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -1. 2% for SPWH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PTRN or SPWH or AMZN or WMT or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 84x versus Walmart Inc. 's 3. 79x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 9x forward P/E versus 41. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 26. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMZN: 25. 1% to $307. 77.
08Which pays a better dividend — PTRN or SPWH or AMZN or WMT or JPM or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), JPM (1. 8% yield), WMT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. PTRN, SPWH, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PTRN or SPWH or AMZN or WMT or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 00), 0. 8% yield, +441. 3% 10Y return). Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +441. 3%, SPWH: -84. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PTRN and SPWH and AMZN and WMT and JPM and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (PTRN (Technology) and SPWH (Consumer Cyclical) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PTRN is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPWH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. WMT, JPM, KO pay a dividend while PTRN, SPWH, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.