Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SBFG vs FXNC vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
SBFG vs FXNC vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $147M | $273M | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $91M | $115M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $18M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 70.6% | 74.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 19.0% | 19.0% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 12.8x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $74M | $43M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $161M | $343.34B |
SBFG vs FXNC vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SB Financial Group,… (SBFG) | 100 | 147.3 | +47.3% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 217.5 | +117.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SBFG vs FXNC vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SBFG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 2.6%
- Beta 0.64, yield 2.6%, current ratio 3.66x
- Lower P/E (9.4x vs 12.8x), PEG 2.94 vs 8.59
FXNC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 0.10x
- NIM 3.6% vs JPM's 2.2%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs FXNC's 258.5%
- PEG 0.81 vs FXNC's 8.59
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 12.8x), PEG 2.94 vs 8.59 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.8% vs JPM's +21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FXNC's 0.5% |
SBFG vs FXNC vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SBFG vs FXNC vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3079.7x SBFG's $91M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 20.4% (JPM) to 15.4% (SBFG).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $91M | $115M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $19M | $25M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $18M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $21M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.6% | +74.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +19.0% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.4% | +15.4% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +18.2% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.5% | +7.1% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SBFG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, SBFG trades at a 33% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs FXNC's 10.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $147M | $273M | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $150M | $155M | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.64x | 15.40x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.44x | 12.82x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.32x | 10.32x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.69x | 7.05x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.61x | 2.43x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 1.46x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.85x | 12.99x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FXNC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $10 for FXNC. FXNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SBFG scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.3% | +10.0% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.9% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +7.7% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +9.9% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.23x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$118M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $161M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $74M | $43M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.68x | 0.84x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,484 for SBFG. Over the past 12 months, FXNC leads with a +57.8% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs SBFG's 25.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.6% | +24.4% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.3% | +57.8% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.0% | +103.7% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.8% | +71.0% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.5% | +258.5% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.6% | +26.8% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
FXNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FXNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FXNC currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.52x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.93 | $30.51 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.10 | $18.31 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.4% | +99.0% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.2 | 67.0 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 79K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SBFG and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FXNC as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -30.4% for FXNC (target: $21). For income investors, SBFG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.58% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $21.00 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +2.0% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 11 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $0.61 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.9% | +0.1% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FXNC leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
SBFG vs FXNC vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SBFG or FXNC or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First National Corporation (FXNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SBFG or FXNC or JPM?
On trailing P/E, SB Financial Group, Inc.
(SBFG) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, SB Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus First National Corporation's 8. 59x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SBFG or FXNC or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +44. 8% for SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus SBFG's +167. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SBFG or FXNC or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First National Corporation (FXNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
52β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 81% more volatile than FXNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First National Corporation (FXNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SBFG or FXNC or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First National Corporation grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SBFG or FXNC or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 15. 4% for SB Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 19. 0% for SBFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SBFG or FXNC or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus First National Corporation's 8. 59x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 5. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — SBFG or FXNC or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is SBFG or FXNC or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
52), 2. 0% yield, +258. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FXNC: +258. 5%, JPM: +465. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SBFG and FXNC and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SBFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.