Asset Management
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SII vs DHIL vs VRTS vs GROW vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
Banks - Diversified
SII vs DHIL vs VRTS vs GROW vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $3.06B | $473M | $972M | $38M | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $386M | $158M | $831M | $11M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $84M | $49M | $138M | $3M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 83.4% | 96.0% | 74.9% | 64.9% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 30.5% | 38.4% | 17.4% | -1.4% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 25.3x | 9.5x | 6.0x | — | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $6.40B | $2.84B | $83K | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $118M | $42M | $477M | $25M | $343.34B |
SII vs DHIL vs VRTS vs GROW vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sprott Inc. (SII) | 100 | 329.1 | +229.1% |
| Diamond Hill Invest… (DHIL) | 100 | 151.4 | +51.4% |
| Virtus Investment P… (VRTS) | 100 | 124.8 | +24.8% |
| U.S. Global Investo… (GROW) | 100 | 155.8 | +55.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SII vs DHIL vs VRTS vs GROW vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SII has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 75.2%, EPS growth 38.7%
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- 75.2% NII/revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1%
- +89.8% vs VRTS's -12.9%
DHIL is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.53, yield 5.7%, current ratio 75115.85x
- Beta 0.53 vs SII's 1.51
VRTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 6.4%
- PEG 0.40 vs SII's 1.32
- Lower P/E (6.0x vs 9.5x), PEG 0.40 vs 1.14
- 6.4% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%
GROW is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 20.87x
JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for bank quality.
- NIM 2.2% vs DHIL's 0.7%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs GROW's 0.8% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs GROW's 0.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 75.2% NII/revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 9.5x), PEG 0.40 vs 1.14 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs GROW's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs SII's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 6.4% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +89.8% vs VRTS's -12.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs GROW's 0.8% |
SII vs DHIL vs VRTS vs GROW vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SII vs DHIL vs VRTS vs GROW vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DHIL leads in 2 of 6 categories
SII leads 2 • VRTS leads 1 • GROW leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHIL leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 25880.1x GROW's $11M. DHIL is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VRTS's 16.7%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $386M | $158M | $831M | $11M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $121M | $62M | $205M | -$111,000 | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $84M | $49M | $138M | $3M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $126M | $44.5B | -$67M | $464,000 | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.4% | +96.0% | +74.9% | +64.9% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +38.4% | +17.4% | -1.4% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +30.9% | +16.7% | +29.1% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +281.7% | -8.1% | +4.3% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +143.5% | +25.3% | +10.9% | +8.8% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
VRTS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.3x trailing earnings, VRTS trades at a 84% valuation discount to SII's 44.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VRTS offers better value at 0.49x vs SII's 2.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $473M | $972M | $38M | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $6.8B | $3.3B | $13M | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 44.83x | 9.77x | 7.27x | -118.40x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.29x | 9.48x | 5.95x | — | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.33x | 1.18x | 0.49x | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.48x | 110.39x | 16.31x | — | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.39x | 3.00x | 1.17x | 4.44x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.35x | 2.70x | 0.97x | 0.87x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.96x | — | — | — | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SII leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DHIL delivers a 27.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $7 for GROW. GROW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DHIL's 36.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SII scores 7/9 vs GROW's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.5% | +27.0% | +13.5% | +7.0% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +17.5% | +19.5% | +3.6% | +6.5% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.1% | +1.3% | +3.0% | -4.7% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.8% | +26.0% | +3.7% | -6.2% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 36.26x | 2.74x | 0.00x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$118M | $6.4B | $2.4B | -$24M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $118M | $42M | $477M | $25M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $6.4B | $2.8B | $83,000 | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 94.69x | — | 2.15x | 776.00x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SII leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SII five years ago would be worth $29,214 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,280 for GROW. Over the past 12 months, SII leads with a +89.8% total return vs VRTS's -12.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SII at 54.8% vs VRTS's -7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.1% | +2.8% | -7.7% | +21.8% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +89.8% | +25.6% | -12.9% | +28.2% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +271.1% | +13.2% | -19.8% | +15.9% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.1% | +29.1% | -37.1% | -47.2% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +555.3% | +41.6% | +156.5% | +89.2% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +54.8% | +4.2% | -7.1% | +5.0% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
DHIL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DHIL is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SII's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DHIL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs VRTS's 67.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 0.53x | 1.12x | 0.77x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $169.63 | $175.03 | $215.06 | $3.65 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $61.94 | $114.11 | $121.61 | $2.23 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.0% | +100.0% | +67.5% | +81.1% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.0 | 70.5 | 49.8 | 67.1 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 174K | 17K | 98K | 25K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VRTS and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SII as "Buy", VRTS as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -6.5% for VRTS (target: $136). For income investors, VRTS offers the higher dividend yield at 6.42% vs SII's 1.09%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $135.67 | — | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — | 11 | — | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +5.7% | +6.4% | +3.1% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.30 | $9.98 | $9.32 | $0.09 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.6% | +6.2% | +5.2% | +3.9% |
DHIL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). SII leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
SII vs DHIL vs VRTS vs GROW vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SII or DHIL or VRTS or GROW or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sprott Inc.
(SII) is the stronger pick with 75. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) offers the better valuation at 7. 3x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sprott Inc. (SII) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SII or DHIL or VRTS or GROW or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.
(VRTS) is the cheapest at 7. 3x versus Sprott Inc. at 44. 8x. On forward P/E, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. wins at 0. 40x versus Sprott Inc. 's 1. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SII or DHIL or VRTS or GROW or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Sprott Inc.
(SII) delivered a total return of +192. 1%, compared to -47. 2% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SII returned +555. 3% versus DHIL's +41. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SII or DHIL or VRTS or GROW or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Sprott Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning SII is approximately 183% more volatile than DHIL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 36% for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SII or DHIL or VRTS or GROW or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sprott Inc.
(SII) is pulling ahead at 75. 2% versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sprott Inc. grew EPS 38. 7% year-over-year, compared to -126. 6% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SII or DHIL or VRTS or GROW or JPM?
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus -4. 0% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DHIL leads at 38. 4% versus -35. 3% for GROW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DHIL leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SII or DHIL or VRTS or GROW or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Sprott Inc. 's 1. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for Sprott Inc. — 19. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — SII or DHIL or VRTS or GROW or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) offers the highest yield at 6. 4%, versus 1. 1% for Sprott Inc. (SII).
09Is SII or DHIL or VRTS or GROW or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 5. 7% yield). Sprott Inc. (SII) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHIL: +41. 6%, SII: +555. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SII and DHIL and VRTS and GROW and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SII is a small-cap high-growth stock; DHIL is a small-cap deep-value stock; VRTS is a small-cap deep-value stock; GROW is a small-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.