Asset Management
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SII vs NEM vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
Banks - Diversified
SII vs NEM vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Gold | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $3.06B | $111.05B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $386M | $17.23B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $84M | $5.26B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 83.4% | 52.1% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 30.5% | 49.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 25.3x | 9.7x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $474M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $118M | $7.65B | $343.34B |
SII vs NEM vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sprott Inc. (SII) | 100 | 329.1 | +229.1% |
| Newmont Corporation (NEM) | 100 | 162.3 | +62.3% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SII vs NEM vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SII has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 75.2%, EPS growth 38.7%
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- 75.2% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3%
NEM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 1.72x
- PEG 0.76 vs SII's 1.32
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.76 vs 1.32
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- Beta 0.94, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
- NIM 2.2% vs SII's 1.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 75.2% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.76 vs 1.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.5% margin vs JPM's 20.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs SII's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs SII's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +89.8% vs JPM's +21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.5% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 21.1% vs 4.5% |
SII vs NEM vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SII vs NEM vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 726.1x SII's $386M. NEM is the more profitable business, keeping 30.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JPM's 20.4%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $386M | $17.2B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $121M | $12.7B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $84M | $5.3B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $126M | $12.9B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.4% | +52.1% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +49.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +30.5% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +75.0% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +143.5% | -100.0% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.6x trailing earnings, NEM trades at a 65% valuation discount to SII's 44.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs SII's 2.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $111.1B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $103.9B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 44.83x | 15.64x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.29x | 9.70x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.33x | 1.22x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.48x | 7.92x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.39x | 5.03x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.35x | 3.26x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.96x | 15.22x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SII leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SII delivers a 23.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $16 for NEM. NEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEM scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.5% | +15.6% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +17.5% | +9.4% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.1% | +24.9% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.8% | +20.7% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.01x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$118M | -$7.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $118M | $7.6B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $474M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 94.69x | 50.54x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SII leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SII five years ago would be worth $29,214 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,416 for NEM. Over the past 12 months, SII leads with a +89.8% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SII at 54.8% vs JPM's 33.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.1% | -0.5% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +89.8% | +81.1% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +271.1% | +146.3% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.1% | +54.2% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +555.3% | +212.4% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +54.8% | +35.1% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SII's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs SII's 70.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 1.45x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $169.63 | $134.88 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $61.94 | $54.14 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.0% | +74.3% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.0 | 38.3 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 174K | 6.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SII as "Buy", NEM as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 43.0% upside for NEM (target: $143) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs NEM's 1.00%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $143.33 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 36 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +1.0% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.30 | $1.00 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +2.1% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). SII leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
SII vs NEM vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SII or NEM or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sprott Inc.
(SII) is the stronger pick with 75. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Newmont Corporation (NEM) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sprott Inc. (SII) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SII or NEM or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the cheapest at 15.
6x versus Sprott Inc. at 44. 8x. On forward P/E, Newmont Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Newmont Corporation wins at 0. 76x versus Sprott Inc. 's 1. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SII or NEM or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Sprott Inc.
(SII) delivered a total return of +192. 1%, compared to +54. 2% for Newmont Corporation (NEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SII returned +555. 3% versus NEM's +212. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SII or NEM or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Sprott Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning SII is approximately 60% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Newmont Corporation (NEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SII or NEM or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sprott Inc.
(SII) is pulling ahead at 75. 2% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Newmont Corporation grew EPS 124. 1% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SII or NEM or JPM?
Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
1% net margin versus 20. 4% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — meaning it keeps 32. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEM leads at 46. 9% versus 26. 0% for JPM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SII leads at 91. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SII or NEM or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 76x versus Sprott Inc. 's 1. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Newmont Corporation (NEM) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for Sprott Inc. — 15. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NEM: 43. 0% to $143. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — SII or NEM or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the highest yield at 1. 9%, versus 1. 0% for Newmont Corporation (NEM).
09Is SII or NEM or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, NEM: +212. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SII and NEM and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (SII (Financial Services) and NEM (Basic Materials) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SII is a small-cap high-growth stock; NEM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.