Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
SNAX logo
SNAX
WMT logo
WMT
JPM logo
JPM
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SNAX vs WMT vs JPM vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SNAX
Stryve Foods, Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$144K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
WMT
Walmart Inc.

Discount Stores

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$963.06B
5Y Perf.+189.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$892.31B
5Y Perf.+218.2%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$348.25B
5Y Perf.+76.8%

SNAX vs WMT vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SNAX logoSNAX
WMT logoWMT
JPM logoJPM
KO logoKO
IndustryPackaged FoodsDiscount StoresBanks - DiversifiedBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$144K$963.06B$892.31B$348.25B
Revenue (TTM)$19M$725.30B$280.33B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$-15M$23.06B$57.05B$13.70B
Gross Margin10.5%25.0%60.0%61.7%
Operating Margin-60.4%4.2%25.9%29.3%
Forward P/E41.6x14.3x24.7x
Total Debt$24M$67.09B$942.38B$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$369K$10.73B$343.34B$10.27B

SNAX vs WMT vs JPM vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SNAX
WMT
JPM
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Stryve Foods, Inc. (SNAX)1000.0-100.0%
Walmart Inc. (WMT)100289.9+189.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100318.2+218.2%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100176.8+76.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SNAX vs WMT vs JPM vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WMT and KO are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. JPM also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SNAX
Stryve Foods, Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

SNAX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
WMT
Walmart Inc.
The Growth Play

WMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta -0.00, Low D/E 63.2%, current ratio 0.79x
  • 4.7% revenue growth vs SNAX's -40.9%
  • Lower D/E ratio (63.2% vs 15.1%)
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 475.6% 10Y total return vs WMT's 441.8%
  • PEG 0.81 vs WMT's 3.78
  • Lower P/E (14.3x vs 24.7x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.21
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Pick

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
  • Beta -0.20, yield 2.5%, current ratio 1.46x
  • 27.8% margin vs SNAX's -79.1%
  • 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWMT logoWMT4.7% revenue growth vs SNAX's -40.9%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.3x vs 24.7x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.21
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs SNAX's -79.1%
Stability / SafetyWMT logoWMTLower D/E ratio (63.2% vs 15.1%)
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)WMT logoWMT+29.2% vs SNAX's -87.3%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs SNAX's -47.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs -39.0%

SNAX vs WMT vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SNAXStryve Foods, Inc.
FY 2021
Wholesale
45.4%$14M
e-Commerce
36.1%$11M
Private Label
18.5%$6M
WMTWalmart Inc.
FY 2026
Walmart U S
68.4%$483.0B
Walmart International
18.5%$130.4B
Sams Club
13.2%$93.0B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

SNAX vs WMT vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGSNAX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $725.3B annually — 37456.4x SNAX's $19M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNAX's -79.1%. On growth, SNAX holds the edge at +36.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSNAX logoSNAXStryve Foods, Inc.WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$19M$725.3B$280.3B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$9M$41.4B$81.4B$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$15M$23.1B$57.0B$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$6M$12.6B$100.9B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+10.5%+25.0%+60.0%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-60.4%+4.2%+25.9%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-79.1%+3.2%+20.4%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-32.2%+1.7%+36.0%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.4%+7.3%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+55.6%+19.6%+16.0%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 15.9x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 64% valuation discount to WMT's 44.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs WMT's 4.02x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSNAX logoSNAXStryve Foods, Inc.WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$143,748$963.1B$892.3B$348.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$24M$1.02T$1.49T$383.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.00x44.26x15.93x26.62x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.41.59x14.34x24.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.02x0.90x2.38x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple23.15x18.32x25.89x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.01x1.35x3.19x7.26x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.05x9.13x2.46x10.18x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF64.53x8.85x65.76x
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-2 for SNAX. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.63x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNAX's 15.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs SNAX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSNAX logoSNAXStryve Foods, Inc.WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.1%+22.7%+15.9%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-47.8%+8.1%+1.3%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-39.0%+14.4%+4.5%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-62.4%+17.5%+8.9%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93657
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage15.06x0.63x2.60x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$24M$56.4B$599.0B$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$369,114$10.7B$343.3B$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$24M$67.1B$942.4B$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-3.69x11.70x0.74x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $26,775 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for SNAX. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +29.2% total return vs SNAX's -87.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 32.9% vs SNAX's -85.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSNAX logoSNAXStryve Foods, Inc.WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1000.0%+7.6%-0.9%+18.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-87.3%+29.2%+20.3%+17.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.7%+134.8%+133.8%+42.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+167.7%+120.7%+63.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+441.8%+475.6%+118.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-85.1%+32.9%+32.7%+12.6%
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SNAX and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SNAX is the less volatile stock with a -3.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs SNAX's 8.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSNAX logoSNAXStryve Foods, Inc.WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-3.16x-0.00x0.94x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$0.39$135.16$337.25$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.00$93.62$266.85$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+8.5%+89.4%+94.7%+96.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10066.447.265.060.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded58418.0M7.0M12.7M
Evenly matched — SNAX and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: WMT as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.4% upside for WMT (target: $139) vs 6.4% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.52% vs WMT's 0.77%.

MetricSNAX logoSNAXStryve Foods, Inc.WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$139.44$339.75$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts666148
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%+1.9%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0521556
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.94$5.95$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.8%+3.9%+0.2%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SNAX vs WMT vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SNAX or WMT or JPM or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -40. 9% for Stryve Foods, Inc. (SNAX). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (14. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 66 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SNAX or WMT or JPM or KO?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 15. 9x versus Walmart Inc. at 44. 3x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Walmart Inc. 's 3. 78x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SNAX or WMT or JPM or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.

(WMT) delivered a total return of +167. 7%, compared to -100. 0% for Stryve Foods, Inc. (SNAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +475. 6% versus SNAX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SNAX or WMT or JPM or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stryve Foods, Inc.

(SNAX) is the lower-risk stock at -3. 16β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -130% more volatile than SNAX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 63% versus 15% for Stryve Foods, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SNAX or WMT or JPM or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus -40. 9% for Stryve Foods, Inc. (SNAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stryve Foods, Inc. grew EPS 47. 0% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SNAX or WMT or JPM or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -107. 5% for Stryve Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -87. 1% for SNAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SNAX or WMT or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Walmart Inc. 's 3. 78x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 41. 6x for Walmart Inc. — 27. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMT: 15. 4% to $139. 44.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SNAX or WMT or JPM or KO?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), WMT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. SNAX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SNAX or WMT or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryve Foods, Inc.

(SNAX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -3. 16)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNAX: -100. 0%, JPM: +475. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SNAX and WMT and JPM and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (SNAX (Consumer Defensive) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SNAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. WMT, JPM, KO pay a dividend while SNAX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.