Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
STAK logo
STAK
BTBT logo
BTBT
MARA logo
MARA
RIOT logo
RIOT
CLSK logo
CLSK
KO logo
KO
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

STAK vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs KO vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
STAK
STAK Inc. Ordinary Shares

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$58M
5Y Perf.+46.9%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$707M
5Y Perf.-11.8%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.42B
5Y Perf.+2.2%
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.65B
5Y Perf.+202.8%
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.

Asset Management - Cryptocurrency

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.42B
5Y Perf.+115.8%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$341.71B
5Y Perf.+11.5%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$908.57B
5Y Perf.+22.9%

STAK vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
STAK logoSTAK
BTBT logoBTBT
MARA logoMARA
RIOT logoRIOT
CLSK logoCLSK
KO logoKO
JPM logoJPM
IndustryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital MarketsAsset Management - CryptocurrencyBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$58M$707M$5.42B$10.65B$4.42B$341.71B$908.57B
Revenue (TTM)$19M$116M$868M$653M$740M$49.28B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$2M$-169M$-2.04B$-867M$-501M$13.70B$57.05B
Gross Margin30.0%46.7%0.3%-13.6%19.2%61.7%60.0%
Operating Margin14.8%101.8%16.9%-125.0%-24.5%29.3%25.9%
Forward P/E26.5x15.4x24.3x14.6x
Total Debt$4M$134M$3.65B$280M$824M$45.49B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$658K$122M$547M$234M$43M$10.27B$343.34B

STAK vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs KO vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

STAK
BTBT
MARA
RIOT
CLSK
KO
JPM
StockFeb 25Jun 26Return
STAK Inc. Ordinary … (STAK)100146.9+46.9%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)10088.2-11.8%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)100102.2+2.2%
Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT)100302.8+202.8%
CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK)100215.8+115.8%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100111.5+11.5%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100122.9+22.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: STAK vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs KO vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO and JPM are tied at the top with 2 categories each (7-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. STAK, RIOT, and CLSK also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
STAK
STAK Inc. Ordinary Shares
The Niche Pick

STAK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.

  • 14.5% ROA vs MARA's -28.0%, ROIC 17.9% vs -9.0%
Best for: efficiency
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Financial Play

BTBT doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Financial Play

In this particular matchup, MARA is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.

Best for: financial services exposure
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.
The Banking Pick

RIOT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +182.7% vs BTBT's -10.0%
Best for: momentum
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
The Growth Play

CLSK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 102.2%, EPS growth 262.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 79.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 3.54, Low D/E 37.9%, current ratio 4.18x
  • 102.2% revenue growth vs BTBT's -30.7%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and dividends.

  • 27.8% margin vs MARA's -234.8%
  • 2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: quality and dividends
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 1.8%
  • 481.2% 10Y total return vs KO's 115.0%
  • PEG 0.83 vs KO's 2.17
  • Beta 0.87, yield 1.8%, current ratio 0.52x
  • NIM 2.2% vs MARA's 0.1%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCLSK logoCLSK102.2% revenue growth vs BTBT's -30.7%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.6x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.83 vs 2.17
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs MARA's -234.8%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.87 vs RIOT's 4.01
DividendsKO logoKO2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)RIOT logoRIOT+182.7% vs BTBT's -10.0%
Efficiency (ROA)STAK logoSTAK14.5% ROA vs MARA's -28.0%, ROIC 17.9% vs -9.0%

STAK vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Crypto Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Crypto Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
STAKSTAK Inc. Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2025
Other Revenue Member
100.0%$1M
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M
RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc.
FY 2025
Bitcoin Mining Segment
85.9%$576M
Engineering Segment
14.1%$94M
CLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
FY 2021
Consolidated Revenues
96.9%$49M
Other Revenue And Eliminations
3.1%$2M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

STAK vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGCLSK

Who Leads Where

KO leads in 2 of 6 categories

JPM leads 1 • STAK leads 1 • BTBT leads 0 • MARA leads 0 • RIOT leads 0 • CLSK leads 0 • 2 tied

Explore the data ↓
CLSKCleanSpark, Inc.
0leads
RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc.
0leads
MARAMarathon Digital Hold…
0leads
BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
0leads
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
1leads
STAKSTAK Inc. Ordinary Sh…
1leads
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
2leads
6 Total Categories

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 14817.7x STAK's $19M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -2.3%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSTAK logoSTAKSTAK Inc. Ordinar…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$19M$116M$868M$653M$740M$49.3B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$162M$953M-$450M$244M$15.5B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$169M-$2.0B-$867M-$501M$13.7B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$170.8B-$385M-$1.0B-$1.1B$12.6B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+30.0%+46.7%+0.3%-13.6%+19.2%+61.7%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+14.8%+101.8%+16.9%-125.0%-24.5%+29.3%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.9%-146.0%-2.3%-132.8%-67.7%+27.8%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-14.6%-1473.2%-44.4%-156.7%-144.9%+25.5%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-24.9%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-40.6%-113.5%-60.0%-2.1%+18.2%+16.0%
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 15.4x trailing earnings, CLSK trades at a 42% valuation discount to STAK's 26.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.92x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSTAK logoSTAKSTAK Inc. Ordinar…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$58M$707M$5.4B$10.7B$4.4B$341.7B$908.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$62M$719M$8.5B$10.7B$5.2B$376.9B$1.51T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS26.50x-7.00x-3.85x-14.41x15.39x26.12x16.22x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.27x14.60x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.34x0.92x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple19.65x7.80x25.45x18.52x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.08x6.22x5.98x16.45x5.77x7.13x3.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.20x6.47x1.45x3.35x2.52x9.99x2.51x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF64.52x9.01x
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

STAK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-52 for MARA. RIOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs BTBT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSTAK logoSTAKSTAK Inc. Ordinar…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+26.1%-0.1%-51.7%-28.8%-29.9%+41.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+14.5%-0.1%-28.0%-21.5%-16.0%+13.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+17.9%-5.8%-9.0%-8.7%+10.3%+15.8%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+29.7%-7.2%-12.1%-11.0%+13.7%+17.3%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93133575
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.42x0.16x1.05x0.10x0.38x1.33x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$4M$12M$3.1B$46M$781M$35.2B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$658,154$122M$547M$234M$43M$10.3B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4M$134M$3.6B$280M$824M$45.5B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense22.15x0.01x12.66x-16.47x-15.45x10.70x0.74x
STAK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — RIOT and CLSK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,893 for BTBT. Over the past 12 months, RIOT leads with a +182.7% total return vs BTBT's -10.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLSK at 57.5% vs BTBT's -17.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSTAK logoSTAKSTAK Inc. Ordinar…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1375.9%+6.4%+43.5%+98.4%+49.3%+16.4%+0.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+142.9%-10.0%-1.9%+182.7%+87.8%+17.7%+20.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+56.3%-43.6%+21.3%+149.8%+290.9%+39.3%+138.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+56.3%-71.1%-50.8%-12.7%-7.2%+65.3%+135.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+56.3%-53.0%-63.3%+710.6%-80.7%+115.0%+481.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+16.1%-17.4%+6.7%+35.7%+57.5%+11.7%+33.7%
Evenly matched — RIOT and CLSK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — STAK and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

STAK is the less volatile stock with a -1.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RIOT's 4.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RIOT currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs BTBT's 47.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSTAK logoSTAKSTAK Inc. Ordinar…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-1.49x3.66x3.28x4.01x3.54x-0.23x0.87x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.50$4.55$23.45$28.94$23.61$84.04$338.09
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.29$1.25$6.66$8.87$8.00$65.35$269.72
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+61.4%+47.7%+60.6%+97.1%+73.0%+94.5%+96.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.358.553.861.055.849.272.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.7M24.5M40.9M17.4M21.5M13.6M7.4M
Evenly matched — STAK and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", RIOT as "Buy", CLSK as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 176.5% upside for BTBT (target: $6) vs -12.1% for MARA (target: $13). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.56% vs CLSK's 0.20%.

MetricSTAK logoSTAKSTAK Inc. Ordinar…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…CLSK logoCLSKCleanSpark, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$6.00$12.50$27.25$18.90$86.13$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts22018114861
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%+0.2%+2.6%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0005615
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.00$0.03$2.04$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.9%+0.0%+3.3%+0.2%+3.8%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). JPM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

STAK vs BTBT vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is STAK or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or KO or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 7% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — STAK or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or KO or JPM?

On trailing P/E, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the cheapest at 15. 4x versus STAK Inc. Ordinary Shares at 26. 5x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 83x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — STAK or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or KO or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to -71. 1% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +710. 6% versus CLSK's -80. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — STAK or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or KO or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), STAK Inc.

Ordinary Shares (STAK) is the lower-risk stock at -1. 49β versus Riot Platforms, Inc. 's 4. 01β — meaning RIOT is approximately -369% more volatile than STAK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — STAK or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or KO or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus -30. 7% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to -673. 5% for Riot Platforms, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLSK leads at 79. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — STAK or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or KO or JPM?

CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is STAK or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 6x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 9. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 176. 5% to $6. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — STAK or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or KO or JPM?

In this comparison, KO (2.

6% yield), JPM (1. 8% yield), CLSK (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. STAK, BTBT, MARA, RIOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is STAK or BTBT or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, STAK Inc.

Ordinary Shares (STAK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1. 49)). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STAK: +56. 3%, CLSK: -80. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between STAK and BTBT and MARA and RIOT and CLSK and KO and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (STAK (Energy) and BTBT (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and RIOT (Financial Services) and CLSK (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: STAK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; RIOT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CLSK is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. KO, JPM pay a dividend while STAK, BTBT, MARA, RIOT, CLSK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.