Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
STUB logo
STUB
LYV logo
LYV
MSGE logo
MSGE
LYFT logo
LYFT
UBER logo
UBER
JPM logo
JPM
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

STUB vs LYV vs MSGE vs LYFT vs UBER vs JPM vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
STUB
StubHub Holdings, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.02B
5Y Perf.-12.2%
LYV
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$40.09B
5Y Perf.+289.1%
MSGE
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.48B
5Y Perf.-2.0%
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.14B
5Y Perf.-59.0%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$142.62B
5Y Perf.+121.5%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%

STUB vs LYV vs MSGE vs LYFT vs UBER vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
STUB logoSTUB
LYV logoLYV
MSGE logoMSGE
LYFT logoLYFT
UBER logoUBER
JPM logoJPM
KO logoKO
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationEntertainmentEntertainmentSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationBanks - DiversifiedBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$4.02B$40.09B$3.48B$5.14B$142.62B$896.00B$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$1.79B$25.61B$1.02B$6.52B$53.69B$280.33B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$-1.84B$84M$49M$2.86B$8.54B$57.05B$13.70B
Gross Margin81.2%40.3%45.5%43.2%41.0%60.0%61.7%
Operating Margin-71.7%3.4%14.6%-2.5%11.7%25.9%29.3%
Forward P/E22.8x65.4x22.1x20.7x14.4x25.3x
Total Debt$1.51B$12.44B$1.20B$1.28B$13.47B$942.38B$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$1.24B$7.11B$43M$1.13B$7.74B$343.34B$10.27B

STUB vs LYV vs MSGE vs LYFT vs UBER vs JPM vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

STUB
LYV
MSGE
LYFT
UBER
JPM
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Live Nation Enterta… (LYV)100389.1+289.1%
Madison Square Gard… (MSGE)10098.0-2.0%
Lyft, Inc. (LYFT)10041.0-59.0%
Uber Technologies, … (UBER)100221.5+121.5%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: STUB vs LYV vs MSGE vs LYFT vs UBER vs JPM vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LYFT leads in 2 of 7 categories (7-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. MSGE, UBER, JPM, and KO also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇LYFT emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
STUB
StubHub Holdings, Inc.
The Technology Pick

In this particular matchup, STUB is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.

Best for: technology exposure
LYV
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

LYV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • 6.4% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.83, current ratio 1.00x
  • Beta 0.83 vs STUB's 1.77
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
MSGE
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
The Momentum Pick

MSGE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +99.5% vs STUB's -47.9%
Best for: momentum
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

LYFT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.

  • 43.8% margin vs STUB's -102.3%
  • 39.1% ROA vs STUB's -34.4%, ROIC -6.1% vs -39.1%
Best for: quality and efficiency
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
The Growth Play

UBER is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 18.3%, EPS growth 3.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.7%
  • 18.3% revenue growth vs MSGE's -1.7%
Best for: growth exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.26
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
Best for: valuation efficiency
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Pick

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
  • Beta -0.20, yield 2.5%, current ratio 1.46x
  • 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (5 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthUBER logoUBER18.3% revenue growth vs MSGE's -1.7%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsLYFT logoLYFT43.8% margin vs STUB's -102.3%
Stability / SafetyLYV logoLYVBeta 0.83 vs STUB's 1.77
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (5 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)MSGE logoMSGE+99.5% vs STUB's -47.9%
Efficiency (ROA)LYFT logoLYFT39.1% ROA vs STUB's -34.4%, ROIC -6.1% vs -39.1%

STUB vs LYV vs MSGE vs LYFT vs UBER vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Autonomous Vehicle Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Autonomous Vehicle Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
STUBStubHub Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

LYVLive Nation Entertainment, Inc.
FY 2025
Concerts
63.3%$3.3B
Sponsorship and Advertising
32.7%$1.7B
Ticketing
4.0%$205M
MSGEMadison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
FY 2025
Entertainment
45.2%$712M
Ticketing And Venue License Fee Revenues
28.8%$453M
Sponsorship and Signage, Suite And Advertising Commission Revenues
16.0%$253M
Food, Beverage And Merchandise Revenues
9.6%$151M
Product and Service, Other
0.4%$6M
LYFTLyft, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

UBERUber Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Mobility
57.0%$29.7B
Delivery
33.2%$17.2B
Freight
9.8%$5.1B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

STUB vs LYV vs MSGE vs LYFT vs UBER vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSTUBLAGGINGUBER

Who Leads Where

STUB leads in 1 of 6 categories

LYFT leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • KO leads 1 • LYV leads 0 • MSGE leads 0 • UBER leads 0 • 2 tied

Explore the data ↓
UBERUber Technologies, In…
0leads
MSGEMadison Square Garden…
0leads
LYVLive Nation Entertain…
0leads
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
1leads
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
1leads
LYFTLyft, Inc.
1leads
STUBStubHub Holdings, Inc.
1leads
6 Total Categories

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

STUB leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 275.2x MSGE's $1.0B. LYFT is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STUB's -102.3%. On growth, UBER holds the edge at +14.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSTUB logoSTUBStubHub Holdings,…LYV logoLYVLive Nation Enter…MSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.8B$25.6B$1.0B$6.5B$53.7B$280.3B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$1.3B$1.6B$206M-$63M$7.0B$81.4B$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$1.8B$84M$49M$2.9B$8.5B$57.0B$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$322M$1.2B$327M$1.2B$9.8B$100.9B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+81.2%+40.3%+45.5%+43.2%+41.0%+60.0%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-71.7%+3.4%+14.6%-2.5%+11.7%+25.9%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-102.3%+0.3%+4.8%+43.8%+15.9%+20.4%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.0%+4.8%+32.1%+17.7%+18.3%+36.0%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.2%+12.1%+1.6%+13.8%+14.5%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+189.2%-4.8%0.0%-84.3%+16.0%+18.2%
STUB leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — LYFT and JPM each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 2.0x trailing earnings, LYFT trades at a 98% valuation discount to MSGE's 95.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSTUB logoSTUBStubHub Holdings,…LYV logoLYVLive Nation Enter…MSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$4.0B$40.1B$3.5B$5.1B$142.6B$896.0B$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.3B$45.4B$4.6B$5.3B$148.3B$1.50T$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.99x-718.79x95.44x1.99x14.56x16.00x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.83x65.39x22.11x20.75x14.40x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.54x24.12x23.50x18.36x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.30x1.59x3.69x0.81x2.74x3.20x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.04x21.99x1.73x5.20x2.47x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.02x120.16x37.35x4.61x14.61x8.88x67.15x
Evenly matched — LYFT and JPM each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LYFT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

LYFT delivers a 150.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $150 in annual profit, vs $-94 for STUB. LYFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYV's 6.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UBER scores 7/9 vs LYFT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSTUB logoSTUBStubHub Holdings,…LYV logoLYVLive Nation Enter…MSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-94.3%+4.4%+8.9%+150.2%+32.0%+15.9%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-34.4%+0.4%+2.1%+39.1%+14.2%+1.3%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-39.1%+19.7%+9.3%-6.1%+13.6%+4.5%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-32.9%+13.4%+12.1%-6.2%+12.5%+8.9%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94564757
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.78x6.84x0.39x0.48x2.60x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$265M$5.3B$1.2B$145M$5.7B$599.0B$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.2B$7.1B$43M$1.1B$7.7B$343.3B$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.5B$12.4B$1.2B$1.3B$13.5B$942.4B$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-11.89x3.68x3.03x-5.32x11.51x0.74x10.70x
LYFT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,318 for LYFT. Over the past 12 months, MSGE leads with a +99.5% total return vs STUB's -47.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs STUB's -19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSTUB logoSTUBStubHub Holdings,…LYV logoLYVLive Nation Enter…MSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-19.8%+18.7%+35.2%-31.6%-16.9%-0.5%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-47.9%+22.1%+99.5%-12.3%-19.6%+21.8%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-47.9%+101.4%+100.7%+29.6%+64.9%+138.2%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-47.9%+99.7%-18.4%-76.8%+35.6%+118.2%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-47.9%+640.7%-17.0%-82.7%+65.6%+465.8%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-19.5%+26.3%+26.1%+9.0%+18.2%+33.6%+13.7%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LYV and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STUB's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYV currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs STUB's 41.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSTUB logoSTUBStubHub Holdings,…LYV logoLYVLive Nation Enter…MSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.77x0.83x0.89x1.37x1.03x0.94x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$27.89$175.25$74.94$25.54$101.99$337.25$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.74$125.34$35.31$12.46$67.19$262.71$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+41.1%+98.4%+98.1%+53.0%+67.5%+95.1%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10069.362.675.048.240.759.160.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4.9M2.3M337K13.7M15.9M7.0M12.7M
Evenly matched — LYV and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: STUB as "Hold", LYV as "Buy", MSGE as "Buy", LYFT as "Hold", UBER as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.1% upside for UBER (target: $102) vs -8.1% for MSGE (target: $68). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricSTUB logoSTUBStubHub Holdings,…LYV logoLYVLive Nation Enter…MSGE logoMSGEMadison Square Ga…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.UBER logoUBERUber Technologies…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.13$185.75$67.57$17.58$101.95$339.75$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts9441359616148
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises011556
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%+0.1%+1.1%+9.7%+4.6%+3.9%+0.2%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

STUB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). LYFT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallStubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

STUB vs LYV vs MSGE vs LYFT vs UBER vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is STUB or LYV or MSGE or LYFT or UBER or JPM or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Uber Technologies, Inc.

(UBER) is the stronger pick with 18. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E (22. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — STUB or LYV or MSGE or LYFT or UBER or JPM or KO?

On trailing P/E, Lyft, Inc.

(LYFT) is the cheapest at 2. 0x versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. at 95. 4x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — STUB or LYV or MSGE or LYFT or UBER or JPM or KO?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -76. 8% for Lyft, Inc. (LYFT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LYV returned +640. 7% versus LYFT's -82. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — STUB or LYV or MSGE or LYFT or UBER or JPM or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus StubHub Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning STUB is approximately -983% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 7% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — STUB or LYV or MSGE or LYFT or UBER or JPM or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Uber Technologies, Inc.

(UBER) is pulling ahead at 18. 3% versus -1. 7% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lyft, Inc. grew EPS 122. 6% year-over-year, compared to -37. 4% for StubHub Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STUB leads at 19. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — STUB or LYV or MSGE or LYFT or UBER or JPM or KO?

Lyft, Inc.

(LYFT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus -109. 2% for StubHub Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -73. 4% for STUB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STUB leads at 80. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is STUB or LYV or MSGE or LYFT or UBER or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 65. 4x for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. — 51. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UBER: 48. 1% to $101. 95.

08

Which pays a better dividend — STUB or LYV or MSGE or LYFT or UBER or JPM or KO?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. STUB, LYV, MSGE, LYFT, UBER do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is STUB or LYV or MSGE or LYFT or UBER or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, STUB: -47. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between STUB and LYV and MSGE and LYFT and UBER and JPM and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (STUB (Technology) and LYV (Communication Services) and MSGE (Communication Services) and LYFT (Technology) and UBER (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: STUB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MSGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYFT is a small-cap deep-value stock; UBER is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. JPM, KO pay a dividend while STUB, LYV, MSGE, LYFT, UBER do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.