Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
STUB vs MA vs V vs LYV vs MSGE vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Entertainment
Entertainment
Banks - Diversified
STUB vs MA vs V vs LYV vs MSGE vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Entertainment | Entertainment | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $4.02B | $433.74B | $618.49B | $40.09B | $3.48B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.79B | $33.94B | $43.03B | $25.61B | $1.02B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.84B | $15.57B | $22.24B | $84M | $49M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 81.2% | 83.0% | 81.3% | 40.3% | 45.5% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -71.7% | 59.4% | 61.1% | 3.4% | 14.6% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 22.8x | 24.9x | 24.5x | — | 65.4x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.51B | $19.00B | $25.17B | $12.44B | $1.20B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.24B | $10.57B | $20.15B | $7.11B | $43M | $343.34B |
STUB vs MA vs V vs LYV vs MSGE vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mastercard Incorpor… (MA) | 100 | 165.7 | +65.7% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 166.9 | +66.9% |
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | 100 | 389.1 | +289.1% |
| Madison Square Gard… (MSGE) | 100 | 98.0 | -2.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STUB vs MA vs V vs LYV vs MSGE vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 6 stocks, STUB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.4%, EPS growth 18.9%
- 16.4% NII/revenue growth vs MSGE's -1.7%
- Beta 0.49 vs STUB's 1.77
- 29.5% ROA vs STUB's -34.4%, ROIC 56.5% vs -39.1%
V is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 0.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 66.4%, current ratio 1.08x
- Beta 0.54, yield 0.7%, current ratio 1.08x
- 51.7% margin vs STUB's -102.3%
LYV is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 6.4% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
MSGE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +99.5% vs STUB's -47.9%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.81 vs V's 1.55
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 65.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.4% NII/revenue growth vs MSGE's -1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 65.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 51.7% margin vs STUB's -102.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs STUB's 1.77 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +99.5% vs STUB's -47.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 29.5% ROA vs STUB's -34.4%, ROIC 56.5% vs -39.1% |
STUB vs MA vs V vs LYV vs MSGE vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STUB vs MA vs V vs LYV vs MSGE vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
MA leads 1 • STUB leads 0 • V leads 0 • LYV leads 0 • MSGE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — STUB and MA and V each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 275.2x MSGE's $1.0B. V is the more profitable business, keeping 51.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STUB's -102.3%. On growth, STUB holds the edge at +12.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $33.9B | $43.0B | $25.6B | $1.0B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.3B | $21.6B | $27.6B | $1.6B | $206M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.8B | $15.6B | $22.2B | $84M | $49M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $322M | $17.7B | $21.2B | $1.2B | $327M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.2% | +83.0% | +81.3% | +40.3% | +45.5% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -71.7% | +59.4% | +61.1% | +3.4% | +14.6% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -102.3% | +45.9% | +51.7% | +0.3% | +4.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +52.2% | +49.2% | +4.8% | +32.1% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.2% | — | — | +12.1% | +1.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +189.2% | +21.2% | +35.3% | -4.8% | 0.0% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 83% valuation discount to MSGE's 95.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs V's 2.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.0B | $433.7B | $618.5B | $40.1B | $3.5B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $442.2B | $623.5B | $45.4B | $4.6B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.99x | 29.66x | 31.61x | -718.79x | 95.44x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.83x | 24.90x | 24.51x | — | 65.39x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.41x | 2.00x | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.52x | 24.73x | 20.54x | 24.12x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.30x | 13.23x | 15.46x | 1.59x | 3.69x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.04x | 56.80x | 16.72x | 21.99x | — | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.02x | 25.65x | 28.66x | 120.16x | 37.35x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MA delivers a 2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-94 for STUB. V carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYV's 6.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MA scores 9/9 vs STUB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -94.3% | +2.1% | +58.9% | +4.4% | +8.9% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -34.4% | +29.5% | +22.7% | +0.4% | +2.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.1% | +56.5% | +29.2% | +19.7% | +9.3% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -32.9% | +64.4% | +36.2% | +13.4% | +12.1% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 2.45x | 0.66x | 6.84x | — | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $265M | $8.4B | $5.0B | $5.3B | $1.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $10.6B | $20.2B | $7.1B | $43M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $19.0B | $25.2B | $12.4B | $1.2B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.89x | 27.23x | 26.72x | 3.68x | 3.03x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,209 for STUB. Over the past 12 months, MSGE leads with a +99.5% total return vs STUB's -47.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs STUB's -19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.8% | -12.7% | -6.6% | +18.7% | +35.2% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -47.9% | -16.3% | -12.5% | +22.1% | +99.5% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.9% | +32.8% | +45.6% | +101.4% | +100.7% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.9% | +37.1% | +42.0% | +99.7% | -18.4% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.9% | +440.0% | +330.2% | +640.7% | -17.0% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.5% | +9.9% | +13.3% | +26.3% | +26.1% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MA and LYV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MA is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STUB's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYV currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs STUB's 41.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.77x | 0.49x | 0.54x | 0.83x | 0.89x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.89 | $601.77 | $374.17 | $175.25 | $74.94 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.74 | $464.52 | $293.89 | $125.34 | $35.31 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.1% | +81.4% | +86.2% | +98.4% | +98.1% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.3 | 45.8 | 46.9 | 62.6 | 75.0 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.9M | 3.1M | 6.4M | 2.3M | 337K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — V and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STUB as "Hold", MA as "Buy", V as "Buy", LYV as "Buy", MSGE as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.8% upside for MA (target: $660) vs -8.1% for MSGE (target: $68). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs MA's 0.63%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.13 | $660.43 | $368.91 | $185.75 | $67.57 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 64 | 61 | 44 | 13 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% | +0.7% | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 14 | 18 | 1 | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.07 | $2.36 | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +2.7% | +2.2% | +0.1% | +1.1% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). MA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
STUB vs MA vs V vs LYV vs MSGE vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STUB or MA or V or LYV or MSGE or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the stronger pick with 16.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mastercard Incorporated (MA) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STUB or MA or V or LYV or MSGE or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. at 95. 4x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STUB or MA or V or LYV or MSGE or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -47. 9% for StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LYV returned +640. 7% versus STUB's -47. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STUB or MA or V or LYV or MSGE or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
49β versus StubHub Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning STUB is approximately 259% more volatile than MA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Visa Inc. (V) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 7% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STUB or MA or V or LYV or MSGE or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is pulling ahead at 16.
4% versus -1. 7% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mastercard Incorporated grew EPS 18. 9% year-over-year, compared to -37. 4% for StubHub Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STUB leads at 19. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STUB or MA or V or LYV or MSGE or JPM?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus -109. 2% for StubHub Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus -73. 4% for STUB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MA leads at 83. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STUB or MA or V or LYV or MSGE or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 65. 4x for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. — 51. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MA: 34. 8% to $660. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — STUB or MA or V or LYV or MSGE or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield), V (0. 7% yield), MA (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. STUB, LYV, MSGE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STUB or MA or V or LYV or MSGE or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
49), 0. 6% yield, +440. 0% 10Y return). StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MA: +440. 0%, STUB: -47. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STUB and MA and V and LYV and MSGE and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (STUB (Technology) and MA (Financial Services) and V (Financial Services) and LYV (Communication Services) and MSGE (Communication Services) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: STUB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MA is a large-cap high-growth stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock; LYV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MSGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. MA, V, JPM pay a dividend while STUB, LYV, MSGE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.