Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
TCBX vs TCBI vs FFIN vs CVBF vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
TCBX vs TCBI vs FFIN vs CVBF vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $555M | $4.49B | $4.83B | $2.88B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $367M | $1.95B | $826M | $644M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $66M | $357M | $254M | $209M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 48.7% | 71.8% | 79.7% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 23.2% | 19.7% | 37.5% | 43.7% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 13.3x | 16.5x | 14.7x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $137M | $951M | $22M | $991M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $175M | $1.90B | $1.08B | $108M | $10.27B |
TCBX vs TCBI vs FFIN vs CVBF vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Third Coast Bancsha… (TCBX) | 100 | 149.6 | +49.6% |
| Texas Capital Bancs… (TCBI) | 100 | 180.2 | +80.2% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 67.4 | -32.6% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 111.1 | +11.1% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 157.5 | +57.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TCBX vs TCBI vs FFIN vs CVBF vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TCBX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 196.7% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
- NIM 3.7% vs CVBF's 2.9%
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.70 vs 2.26
TCBI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 13.5%, EPS growth 431.3%
- PEG 0.31 vs CVBF's 4.64
- 13.5% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3%
- +32.7% vs FFIN's -5.5%
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.78, yield 2.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 0.68x
- Beta 0.78, yield 2.2%, current ratio 0.68x
- Beta 0.78 vs TCBI's 1.09, lower leverage
CVBF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and dividends is your priority.
- 32.5% margin vs TCBX's 18.1%
- 3.8% yield, vs KO's 2.5%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 13.1% ROA vs TCBI's 1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.5% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.70 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.5% margin vs TCBX's 18.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.78 vs TCBI's 1.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs FFIN's -5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs TCBI's 1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.0% |
TCBX vs TCBI vs FFIN vs CVBF vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TCBX vs TCBI vs FFIN vs CVBF vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TCBX leads in 2 of 6 categories
CVBF leads 1 • KO leads 1 • TCBI leads 0 • FFIN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 134.3x TCBX's $367M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TCBX's 18.1%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $367M | $1.9B | $826M | $644M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $90M | $410M | $320M | $294M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $66M | $357M | $254M | $209M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $48M | $885M | $283M | $217M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | +48.7% | +71.8% | +79.7% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.2% | +19.7% | +37.5% | +43.7% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +18.3% | +30.7% | +32.5% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +45.5% | +34.3% | +33.7% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.7% | +76.1% | -7.7% | +11.1% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TCBX leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, TCBX trades at a 61% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TCBI offers better value at 0.34x vs CVBF's 4.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $555M | $4.5B | $4.8B | $2.9B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $516M | $3.5B | $3.8B | $3.8B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.58x | 14.93x | 19.01x | 13.97x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.27x | 13.28x | 16.54x | 14.74x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.72x | 0.34x | 4.22x | 4.40x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.73x | 7.38x | 11.79x | 13.37x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.51x | 2.25x | 5.85x | 4.48x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.24x | 1.27x | 2.52x | 1.26x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.52x | 12.91x | 15.72x | 13.26x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $9 for CVBF. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TCBI scores 9/9 vs CVBF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.1% | +9.9% | +14.2% | +9.3% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +1.1% | +1.7% | +1.4% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.1% | +7.0% | +12.4% | +6.8% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.4% | +2.5% | +16.6% | +9.3% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | 0.26x | 0.01x | 0.43x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$38M | -$947M | -$1.1B | $883M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $175M | $1.9B | $1.1B | $108M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $137M | $951M | $22M | $991M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.54x | 0.54x | 1.54x | 2.12x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TCBX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TCBX five years ago would be worth $29,672 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,409 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, TCBI leads with a +32.7% total return vs FFIN's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TCBX at 32.8% vs FFIN's 7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.1% | +10.9% | +13.5% | +14.8% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.7% | +32.7% | -5.5% | +16.3% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +134.1% | +92.7% | +24.3% | +64.4% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +196.7% | +54.1% | -25.9% | +15.2% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +196.7% | +109.7% | +136.4% | +66.9% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.8% | +24.4% | +7.5% | +18.0% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CVBF and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TCBI's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVBF currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 86.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 1.09x | 0.78x | 0.81x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.84 | $108.92 | $38.74 | $21.48 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.66 | $73.61 | $28.11 | $17.95 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.4% | +93.2% | +86.9% | +98.8% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.5 | 52.2 | 61.3 | 60.1 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 84K | 416K | 683K | 1.6M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVBF and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TCBX as "Buy", TCBI as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs TCBI's 0.37%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.00 | $106.17 | $39.25 | $24.75 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 39 | 15 | 16 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +0.4% | +2.2% | +3.8% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.29 | $0.38 | $0.74 | $0.82 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.1% | 0.0% | +2.8% | +0.2% |
TCBX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). CVBF leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
TCBX vs TCBI vs FFIN vs CVBF vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TCBX or TCBI or FFIN or CVBF or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.
(TCBI) is the stronger pick with 13. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. (TCBX) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. (TCBX) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TCBX or TCBI or FFIN or CVBF or KO?
On trailing P/E, Third Coast Bancshares, Inc.
(TCBX) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TCBX or TCBI or FFIN or CVBF or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Third Coast Bancshares, Inc.
(TCBX) delivered a total return of +196. 7%, compared to -25. 9% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TCBX returned +196. 7% versus CVBF's +66. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TCBX or TCBI or FFIN or CVBF or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 09β — meaning TCBI is approximately -642% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TCBX or TCBI or FFIN or CVBF or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.
(TCBI) is pulling ahead at 13. 5% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 431. 3% year-over-year, compared to 5. 6% for CVB Financial Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TCBX or TCBI or FFIN or CVBF or KO?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 16. 5% for Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 22. 2% for TCBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TCBX or TCBI or FFIN or CVBF or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. (TCBI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. (TCBX) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 16. 6% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — TCBX or TCBI or FFIN or CVBF or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 0. 4% for Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. (TCBI).
09Is TCBX or TCBI or FFIN or CVBF or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, TCBI: +109. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TCBX and TCBI and FFIN and CVBF and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (TCBX (Financial Services) and TCBI (Financial Services) and FFIN (Financial Services) and CVBF (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TCBX is a small-cap deep-value stock; TCBI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. TCBX, FFIN, CVBF, KO pay a dividend while TCBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.