Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
VENU logo
VENU
PLAY logo
PLAY
EAT logo
EAT
FUN logo
FUN
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

VENU vs PLAY vs EAT vs FUN vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
VENU
Venu Holding Corporation

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalAMEX • US
Market Cap$146M
5Y Perf.-68.3%
PLAY
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$820M
5Y Perf.-67.1%
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.83B
5Y Perf.+20.5%
FUN
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation

Leisure

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.40B
5Y Perf.-49.3%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+28.4%

VENU vs PLAY vs EAT vs FUN vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
VENU logoVENU
PLAY logoPLAY
EAT logoEAT
FUN logoFUN
JPM logoJPM
IndustryRestaurantsEntertainmentRestaurantsLeisureBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$146M$820M$6.83B$2.40B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$15M$2.11B$5.73B$3.12B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-40M$300K$463M$-1.65B$57.05B
Gross Margin-6.4%30.7%46.0%21.6%60.0%
Operating Margin-302.8%7.1%10.4%9.9%25.9%
Forward P/E102.4x14.8x14.4x
Total Debt$107M$3.14B$1.69B$5.43B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$41M$7M$19M$91M$343.34B

VENU vs PLAY vs EAT vs FUN vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

VENU
PLAY
EAT
FUN
JPM
StockNov 24Jun 26Return
Venu Holding Corpor… (VENU)10031.7-68.3%
Dave & Buster's Ent… (PLAY)10032.9-67.1%
Brinker Internation… (EAT)100120.5+20.5%
Six Flags Entertain… (FUN)10050.7-49.3%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100128.4+28.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: VENU vs PLAY vs EAT vs FUN vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Brinker International, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
VENU
Venu Holding Corporation
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

VENU plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
PLAY
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
The Communication Services Pick

PLAY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
The Growth Play

EAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Rev growth 21.9%, EPS growth 144.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.3%
  • PEG 0.22 vs JPM's 0.81
  • 21.9% revenue growth vs PLAY's -3.3%
  • 17.0% ROA vs FUN's -20.1%, ROIC 19.1% vs 3.1%
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
FUN
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

Among these 5 stocks, FUN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs EAT's 256.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.94, current ratio 0.52x
  • Beta 0.94, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthEAT logoEAT21.9% revenue growth vs PLAY's -3.3%
ValueJPM logoJPMBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs VENU's -262.7%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.94 vs PLAY's 1.84, lower leverage
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)JPM logoJPM+21.8% vs VENU's -68.1%
Efficiency (ROA)EAT logoEAT17.0% ROA vs FUN's -20.1%, ROIC 19.1% vs 3.1%

VENU vs PLAY vs EAT vs FUN vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

VENUVenu Holding Corporation
FY 2025
Food and Beverage
54.6%$10M
Event Center Ticket And Fees Revenue
33.8%$6M
Rental and Sponsorship Revenue
11.6%$2M
PLAYDave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.
FY 2024
Entertainment
65.2%$1.4B
Food and Beverage
34.8%$742M
EATBrinker International, Inc.
FY 2025
Chili's Restaurants
90.7%$4.9B
Maggiano's Restaurants
9.3%$501M
FUNSix Flags Entertainment Corporation
FY 2025
Admission
51.1%$1.6B
Food, Merchandise and Gaming
33.5%$1.0B
Accommodations, Extra-Charge Products And Other
15.4%$478M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

VENU vs PLAY vs EAT vs FUN vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGFUN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 18463.9x VENU's $15M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VENU's -2.6%. On growth, FUN holds the edge at +11.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricVENU logoVENUVenu Holding Corp…PLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…FUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$15M$2.1B$5.7B$3.1B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$39M$405M$819M$800M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$40M$300,000$463M-$1.6B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$177M-$175M$504M$29M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-6.4%+30.7%+46.0%+21.6%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.0%+7.1%+10.4%+9.9%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.6%+0.0%+8.1%-52.8%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-11.7%-8.3%+8.8%+0.9%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.5%-1.1%+3.2%+11.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+39.6%-45.2%+12.1%-20.5%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — VENU and PLAY and JPM each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 8.9x trailing earnings, PLAY trades at a 54% valuation discount to EAT's 19.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EAT offers better value at 0.28x vs JPM's 0.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricVENU logoVENUVenu Holding Corp…PLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…FUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$146M$820M$6.8B$2.4B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$212M$4.0B$8.5B$7.7B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.11x8.86x19.15x-1.47x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.102.38x14.80x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.28x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.62x11.84x10.11x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.17x0.38x1.27x0.77x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.63x3.55x19.80x3.03x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF16.52x8.88x
Evenly matched — VENU and PLAY and JPM each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

EAT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

EAT delivers a 123.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $123 in annual profit, vs $-158 for FUN. VENU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLAY's 21.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EAT scores 7/9 vs FUN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricVENU logoVENUVenu Holding Corp…PLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…FUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-18.7%+0.2%+123.4%-157.6%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-11.5%+0.0%+17.0%-20.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-20.7%+5.1%+19.1%+3.1%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-22.7%+6.4%+25.8%+3.6%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946745
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.54x21.53x4.57x6.92x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$66M$3.1B$1.7B$5.3B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$41M$7M$19M$91M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$107M$3.1B$1.7B$5.4B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-4.98x1.06x18.61x0.84x0.74x
EAT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

EAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in EAT five years ago would be worth $26,723 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,058 for PLAY. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs VENU's -68.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EAT at 61.5% vs PLAY's -30.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricVENU logoVENUVenu Holding Corp…PLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…FUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-57.1%-24.1%+5.1%+51.3%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-68.1%-57.9%-9.6%-26.2%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.2%-66.6%+321.3%-42.7%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.2%-69.4%+167.2%-43.5%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.2%-70.4%+256.1%-33.1%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-30.3%-30.6%+61.5%-17.0%+33.6%
EAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLAY's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs VENU's 18.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricVENU logoVENUVenu Holding Corp…PLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…FUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.79x1.84x1.01x1.71x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$18.17$35.53$187.12$33.50$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.06$9.65$100.30$12.51$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+18.8%+36.4%+85.1%+70.0%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.261.264.270.659.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded296K1.6M1.1M1.7M7.0M
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: PLAY as "Buy", EAT as "Buy", FUN as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.9% upside for PLAY (target: $16) vs 2.4% for FUN (target: $24). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricVENU logoVENUVenu Holding Corp…PLAY logoPLAYDave & Buster's E…EAT logoEATBrinker Internati…FUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.50$184.46$24.00$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts19472961
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises100015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+21.2%+1.3%0.0%+3.9%
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). EAT leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

VENU vs PLAY vs EAT vs FUN vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is VENU or PLAY or EAT or FUN or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) is the stronger pick with 21. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) offers the better valuation at 8. 9x trailing P/E (102. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — VENU or PLAY or EAT or FUN or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.

(PLAY) is the cheapest at 8. 9x versus Brinker International, Inc. at 19. 1x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Brinker International, Inc. wins at 0. 22x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — VENU or PLAY or EAT or FUN or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) delivered a total return of +167. 2%, compared to -69. 4% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus PLAY's -70. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — VENU or PLAY or EAT or FUN or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning PLAY is approximately 95% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Venu Holding Corporation (VENU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 22% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — VENU or PLAY or EAT or FUN or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) is pulling ahead at 21. 9% versus -3. 3% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brinker International, Inc. grew EPS 144. 7% year-over-year, compared to -591. 3% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, VENU leads at 27. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — VENU or PLAY or EAT or FUN or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -246. 4% for Venu Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -296. 3% for VENU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLAY leads at 85. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is VENU or PLAY or EAT or FUN or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 22x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 102. 4x for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — 88. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLAY: 19. 9% to $15. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — VENU or PLAY or EAT or FUN or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. VENU, PLAY, EAT, FUN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is VENU or PLAY or EAT or FUN or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, PLAY: -70. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between VENU and PLAY and EAT and FUN and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (VENU (Consumer Cyclical) and PLAY (Communication Services) and EAT (Consumer Cyclical) and FUN (Consumer Cyclical) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: VENU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PLAY is a small-cap deep-value stock; EAT is a small-cap high-growth stock; FUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while VENU, PLAY, EAT, FUN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.