Information Technology Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
WAY vs NVCR vs COLL vs MTEX vs VEEV vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Household & Personal Products
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
WAY vs NVCR vs COLL vs MTEX vs VEEV vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Household & Personal Products | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $3.60B | $2.02B | $1.12B | $11M | $25.92B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.16B | $674M | $796M | $106M | $3.32B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $126M | $-173M | $75M | $-13M | $942M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 65.2% | 75.2% | 60.7% | 75.3% | 75.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 24.3% | -27.2% | 23.8% | 0.2% | 28.8% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.4x | — | 4.5x | — | 17.6x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.50B | $290M | $941M | $7M | $96M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $61M | $103M | $251M | $6M | $1.42B | $10.27B |
WAY vs NVCR vs COLL vs MTEX vs VEEV vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Waystar Holding Cor… (WAY) | 100 | 87.2 | -12.8% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 103.8 | +3.8% |
| Collegium Pharmaceu… (COLL) | 100 | 107.6 | +7.6% |
| Mannatech, Incorpor… (MTEX) | 100 | 81.0 | -19.0% |
| Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) | 100 | 87.2 | -12.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 129.8 | +29.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WAY vs NVCR vs COLL vs MTEX vs VEEV vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WAY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.5%, EPS growth 5.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.0%
Among these 6 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
COLL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.44
- 126.0% 10Y total return vs VEEV's 367.2%
- PEG 0.25 vs KO's 2.26
- Beta 0.44, current ratio 1.57x
MTEX doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
VEEV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 4.89x
- 28.4% margin vs NVCR's -25.7%
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
- +17.2% vs WAY's -52.6%
- 13.1% ROA vs MTEX's -40.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.6% revenue growth vs MTEX's -8.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.5x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.25 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.4% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.44 vs NVCR's 2.21 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.2% vs WAY's -52.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs MTEX's -40.2% |
WAY vs NVCR vs COLL vs MTEX vs VEEV vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WAY vs NVCR vs COLL vs MTEX vs VEEV vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
COLL leads 2 • WAY leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • MTEX leads 0 • VEEV leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLL leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 463.2x MTEX's $106M. VEEV is the more profitable business, keeping 28.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, WAY holds the edge at +22.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $674M | $796M | $106M | $3.3B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $430M | -$165M | $529M | $2M | $1.1B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $126M | -$173M | $75M | -$13M | $942M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $294M | -$48M | $330M | -$1M | $518M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.2% | +75.2% | +60.7% | +75.3% | +75.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.3% | -27.2% | +23.8% | +0.2% | +28.8% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | -25.7% | +9.4% | -12.0% | +28.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | -7.1% | +41.4% | -1.4% | +15.6% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.4% | +12.3% | +8.9% | -6.2% | +16.3% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.5% | -100.0% | +4.4% | +161.3% | +14.6% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
COLL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.0x trailing earnings, COLL trades at a 35% valuation discount to WAY's 30.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), COLL offers better value at 1.12x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $2.0B | $1.1B | $11M | $25.9B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.0B | $2.2B | $1.8B | $12M | $24.6B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.74x | -14.57x | 20.02x | -0.69x | 29.33x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.42x | — | 4.49x | — | 17.61x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.12x | — | 1.61x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.39x | — | 4.39x | 7.22x | 20.59x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.27x | 3.09x | 1.44x | 0.10x | 8.11x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 5.82x | 4.56x | — | 3.69x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.70x | — | 3.43x | — | 18.70x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-24 for MTEX. VEEV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COLL's 3.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs MTEX's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.5% | -50.8% | +26.7% | -23.8% | +13.4% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | -16.5% | +4.6% | -40.2% | +11.0% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | -16.4% | +14.0% | — | +12.9% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.2% | -28.9% | +15.8% | -3.2% | +13.8% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.39x | 0.85x | 3.12x | — | 0.01x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $187M | $689M | $1M | -$1.3B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $61M | $103M | $251M | $6M | $1.4B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $290M | $941M | $7M | $96M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.51x | -96.80x | 1.65x | 0.99x | — | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — COLL and KO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $808 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, KO leads with a +17.2% total return vs WAY's -52.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COLL at 16.0% vs NVCR's -26.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.2% | +35.5% | -23.9% | -34.1% | -27.3% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -52.6% | -2.3% | +17.0% | -42.5% | -43.5% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.4% | -59.8% | +56.2% | -53.5% | -16.2% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.4% | -91.9% | +50.7% | -66.5% | -47.5% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.4% | +62.1% | +126.0% | -39.9% | +367.2% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.2% | -26.2% | +16.0% | -22.5% | -5.7% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs MTEX's 44.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.84x | 2.21x | 0.44x | 0.44x | 0.69x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.47 | $18.92 | $50.79 | $12.45 | $310.50 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.89 | $9.82 | $29.08 | $3.81 | $148.05 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.2% | +94.0% | +68.2% | +44.2% | +51.4% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.3 | 57.1 | 53.0 | 52.3 | 43.8 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 1.5M | 422K | 23K | 2.3M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WAY as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", COLL as "Buy", VEEV as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 90.0% upside for WAY (target: $36) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.62 | $33.50 | $58.00 | — | $235.38 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 15 | 12 | — | 43 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.2% | 0.0% | +0.7% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). COLL leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
WAY vs NVCR vs COLL vs MTEX vs VEEV vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WAY or NVCR or COLL or MTEX or VEEV or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
(COLL) is the stronger pick with 23. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 3% for Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX). Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (COLL) offers the better valuation at 20. 0x trailing P/E (4. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Waystar Holding Corp. (WAY) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WAY or NVCR or COLL or MTEX or VEEV or KO?
On trailing P/E, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
(COLL) is the cheapest at 20. 0x versus Waystar Holding Corp. at 30. 7x. On forward P/E, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. wins at 0. 25x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WAY or NVCR or COLL or MTEX or VEEV or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to -91. 9% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VEEV returned +367. 2% versus MTEX's -39. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WAY or NVCR or COLL or MTEX or VEEV or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 21β — meaning NVCR is approximately -1202% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WAY or NVCR or COLL or MTEX or VEEV or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
(COLL) is pulling ahead at 23. 6% versus -8. 3% for Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Waystar Holding Corp. grew EPS 569. 2% year-over-year, compared to -706. 1% for Mannatech, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, COLL leads at 18. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WAY or NVCR or COLL or MTEX or VEEV or KO?
Veeva Systems Inc.
(VEEV) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VEEV leads at 75. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WAY or NVCR or COLL or MTEX or VEEV or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (COLL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (COLL) trades at 4. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 20. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WAY: 90. 0% to $35. 62.
08Which pays a better dividend — WAY or NVCR or COLL or MTEX or VEEV or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. WAY, NVCR, COLL, MTEX, VEEV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WAY or NVCR or COLL or MTEX or VEEV or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, NVCR: +62. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WAY and NVCR and COLL and MTEX and VEEV and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (WAY (Technology) and NVCR (Healthcare) and COLL (Healthcare) and MTEX (Consumer Defensive) and VEEV (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WAY is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COLL is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VEEV is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while WAY, NVCR, COLL, MTEX, VEEV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.