Oil & Gas Energy
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
WBI vs COP vs FANG vs OXY vs SLB vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Banks - Diversified
WBI vs COP vs FANG vs OXY vs SLB vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Energy | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $1.43B | $140.61B | $53.90B | $55.17B | $84.06B | $875.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $548M | $58.31B | $15.19B | $23.18B | $35.71B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $7.32B | $403M | $4.71B | $3.35B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | 29.2% | 41.8% | 26.2% | 18.2% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | 18.3% | 22.1% | 12.4% | 15.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 62.5x | 11.5x | 9.4x | 10.2x | 21.7x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $23.44B | $14.49B | $23.96B | $12.31B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $52M | $6.50B | $106M | $1.99B | $3.04B | $343.34B |
WBI vs COP vs FANG vs OXY vs SLB vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | 100 | 278.4 | +178.4% |
| Diamondback Energy,… (FANG) | 100 | 459.4 | +359.4% |
| Occidental Petroleu… (OXY) | 100 | 309.0 | +209.0% |
| SLB N.V. (SLB) | 100 | 305.5 | +205.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WBI vs COP vs FANG vs OXY vs SLB vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 6 stocks, WBI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
COP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta -0.18, yield 2.8%
FANG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 36.3%, EPS growth -63.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.2%
- 36.3% revenue growth vs OXY's -20.3%
- Lower P/E (9.4x vs 14.4x)
OXY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 2.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
SLB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 45.1%, current ratio 1.33x
- Beta 0.85, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.33x
- Beta 0.85 vs JPM's 0.95, lower leverage
- +60.2% vs JPM's +19.1%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 454.4% 10Y total return vs COP's 220.0%
- 20.4% margin vs FANG's 2.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.3% revenue growth vs OXY's -20.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 14.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs FANG's 2.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs JPM's 0.95, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.2% vs JPM's +19.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs WBI's 0.4%, ROIC 12.1% vs 3.3% |
WBI vs COP vs FANG vs OXY vs SLB vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WBI vs COP vs FANG vs OXY vs SLB vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
WBI leads 2 • COP leads 0 • FANG leads 0 • OXY leads 0 • SLB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 511.2x WBI's $548M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FANG's 2.7%. On growth, WBI holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $548M | $58.3B | $15.2B | $23.2B | $35.7B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $249M | $22.4B | $8.6B | $10.6B | $7.4B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $7.3B | $403M | $4.7B | $3.4B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$135M | $18.3B | $1.6B | $3.6B | $4.8B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | +29.2% | +41.8% | +26.2% | +18.2% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +18.3% | +22.1% | +12.4% | +15.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +12.6% | +2.7% | +20.3% | +9.4% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -24.6% | +31.4% | +10.5% | +15.4% | +13.4% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.8% | -2.5% | +5.2% | -23.1% | +5.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -20.2% | -98.3% | +3.1% | -31.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
WBI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.6x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 55% valuation discount to OXY's 34.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WBI's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 18.1x.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $140.6B | $53.9B | $55.2B | $84.1B | $875.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $157.6B | $68.3B | $77.1B | $93.3B | $1.47T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -305.00x | 18.17x | 33.44x | 34.45x | 23.83x | 15.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 62.49x | 11.49x | 9.45x | 10.18x | 21.69x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — | 1.20x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.35x | 6.80x | 6.86x | 6.79x | 12.67x | 18.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.73x | 2.39x | 3.59x | 2.56x | 2.35x | 3.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.71x | 2.24x | 1.29x | 1.52x | 3.05x | 2.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.38x | 10.30x | 13.44x | 17.53x | 8.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WBI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $1 for WBI. WBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WBI scores 7/9 vs SLB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.9% | +11.3% | +0.9% | +12.6% | +13.9% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +6.0% | +0.6% | +5.6% | +6.5% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +10.4% | +6.7% | +4.7% | +12.1% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +10.4% | +7.6% | +4.9% | +14.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.36x | 0.34x | 0.65x | 0.45x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$39M | $16.9B | $14.4B | $22.0B | $9.3B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52M | $6.5B | $106M | $2.0B | $3.0B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $23.4B | $14.5B | $24.0B | $12.3B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.30x | 9.42x | 0.66x | 3.25x | 9.40x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FANG five years ago would be worth $25,659 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,148 for WBI. Over the past 12 months, SLB leads with a +60.2% total return vs JPM's +19.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 32.6% vs OXY's -0.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.5% | +21.0% | +27.2% | +32.1% | +40.8% | -2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.5% | +27.1% | +31.4% | +25.9% | +60.2% | +19.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | +22.2% | +62.0% | -1.7% | +26.2% | +133.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | +123.2% | +156.6% | +108.6% | +74.1% | +110.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.5% | +220.0% | +156.1% | -6.0% | -11.3% | +454.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.7% | +6.9% | +17.5% | -0.6% | +8.1% | +32.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WBI and OXY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OXY is the less volatile stock with a -0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WBI currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs OXY's 82.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | -0.26x | -0.18x | -0.45x | 0.82x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.90 | $135.87 | $214.51 | $67.45 | $58.82 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.18 | $85.57 | $134.30 | $39.26 | $31.64 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +84.9% | +89.3% | +82.2% | +95.2% | +93.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 52.0 | 48.7 | 47.3 | 49.4 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 599K | 6.8M | 2.5M | 11.6M | 12.1M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OXY and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WBI as "Buy", COP as "Buy", FANG as "Buy", OXY as "Buy", SLB as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.2% upside for COP (target: $133) vs 7.6% for SLB (target: $60). For income investors, OXY offers the higher dividend yield at 2.87% vs JPM's 1.90%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.00 | $132.92 | $218.29 | $62.31 | $60.23 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 52 | 51 | 52 | 66 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% | +2.1% | +2.9% | +1.9% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.19 | $4.00 | $1.59 | $1.08 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.6% | +3.7% | 0.0% | +2.9% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). WBI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
WBI vs COP vs FANG vs OXY vs SLB vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WBI or COP or FANG or OXY or SLB or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) is the stronger pick with 36. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 3% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WBI or COP or FANG or OXY or SLB or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 15. 6x versus Occidental Petroleum Corporation at 34. 5x. On forward P/E, Diamondback Energy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WBI or COP or FANG or OXY or SLB or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) delivered a total return of +156. 6%, compared to +21. 5% for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus SLB's -11. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WBI or COP or FANG or OXY or SLB or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
45β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -308% more volatile than OXY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC (WBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WBI or COP or FANG or OXY or SLB or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) is pulling ahead at 36. 3% versus -20. 3% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -63. 1% for Diamondback Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FANG leads at 16. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WBI or COP or FANG or OXY or SLB or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -0. 9% for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FANG leads at 32. 7% versus 15. 0% for WBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WBI or COP or FANG or OXY or SLB or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 62. 5x for WaterBridge Infrastructure LLC — 53. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COP: 15. 2% to $132. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — WBI or COP or FANG or OXY or SLB or JPM?
In this comparison, OXY (2.
9% yield), COP (2. 8% yield), FANG (2. 1% yield), SLB (1. 9% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. WBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WBI or COP or FANG or OXY or SLB or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
45), 2. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OXY: -4. 6%, WBI: +29. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WBI and COP and FANG and OXY and SLB and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (WBI (Energy) and COP (Energy) and FANG (Energy) and OXY (Energy) and SLB (Energy) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FANG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OXY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SLB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. COP, FANG, OXY, SLB, JPM pay a dividend while WBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.