Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ZNTL vs TGTX vs RCUS vs KYMR vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Banks - Diversified
ZNTL vs TGTX vs RCUS vs KYMR vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $267M | $7.58B | $2.40B | $7.04B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $700M | $236M | $51M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-124M | $462M | $-369M | $-315M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | — | 83.0% | 90.7% | 33.2% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 21.3% | -168.6% | -7.0% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 35.9x | — | — | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $40M | $261M | $99M | $82M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $79M | $222M | $357M | $343.34B |
ZNTL vs TGTX vs RCUS vs KYMR vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zentalis Pharmaceut… (ZNTL) | 100 | 10.9 | -89.1% |
| TG Therapeutics, In… (TGTX) | 100 | 199.6 | +99.6% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 100.0 | 0.0% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 270.2 | +170.2% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 320.1 | +220.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZNTL vs TGTX vs RCUS vs KYMR vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZNTL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +156.8% vs JPM's +21.8%
TGTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 87.3%, EPS growth 17.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 87.3% revenue growth vs ZNTL's -100.0%
- 66.0% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
- Beta 0.65 vs ZNTL's 2.26
RCUS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.91, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
- Beta 0.91, current ratio 10.47x
JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs TGTX's 6.1%
- Better valuation composite
- 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 87.3% revenue growth vs ZNTL's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 66.0% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs ZNTL's 2.26 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +156.8% vs JPM's +21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.8% ROA vs ZNTL's -40.7%, ROIC 16.4% vs -40.5% |
ZNTL vs TGTX vs RCUS vs KYMR vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ZNTL vs TGTX vs RCUS vs KYMR vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TGTX leads in 3 of 6 categories
JPM leads 2 • ZNTL leads 0 • RCUS leads 0 • KYMR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and ZNTL operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. TGTX is the more profitable business, keeping 66.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, TGTX holds the edge at +69.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $700M | $236M | $51M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$144M | $150M | -$391M | -$352M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$124M | $462M | -$369M | -$315M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$126M | -$14M | -$489M | -$244M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +83.0% | +90.7% | +33.2% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +21.3% | -168.6% | -7.0% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +66.0% | -156.4% | -6.1% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -2.0% | -2.1% | -4.7% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +69.6% | -39.3% | +55.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.4% | +2.9% | +10.5% | +13.4% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 11% valuation discount to TGTX's 17.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JPM's 18.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TGTX's 62.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $267M | $7.6B | $2.4B | $7.0B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $271M | $7.8B | $2.3B | $6.8B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.96x | 17.88x | -7.23x | -23.36x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 35.88x | — | — | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 62.82x | — | — | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 12.30x | 9.70x | 179.54x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.25x | 12.33x | 4.05x | 4.61x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TGTX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGTX delivers a 87.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $87 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. KYMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -53.6% | +87.4% | -69.0% | -25.0% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.7% | +42.8% | -35.3% | -22.3% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -40.5% | +16.4% | -64.1% | -24.9% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -48.5% | +17.7% | -42.1% | -27.2% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.40x | 0.16x | 0.05x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $182M | -$123M | -$275M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $79M | $222M | $357M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $40M | $261M | $99M | $82M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 5.67x | -13.38x | -2119.53x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ZNTL and KYMR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $669 for ZNTL. Over the past 12 months, ZNTL leads with a +156.8% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 50.8% vs ZNTL's -46.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +173.7% | +69.1% | +2.2% | +18.5% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +156.8% | +32.5% | +154.5% | +82.3% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.5% | +89.0% | +18.3% | +242.9% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.3% | +29.3% | -3.1% | +70.4% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.8% | +605.4% | +40.0% | +159.2% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.2% | +23.6% | +5.8% | +50.8% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
TGTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TGTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZNTL's 2.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TGTX currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs ZNTL's 54.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.26x | 0.65x | 2.00x | 0.91x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.95 | $50.41 | $28.72 | $103.00 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.13 | $25.28 | $7.91 | $36.65 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.0% | +98.2% | +82.9% | +83.7% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.5 | 76.1 | 46.5 | 56.8 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 2.0M | 1.1M | 492K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ZNTL as "Buy", TGTX as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 166.7% upside for ZNTL (target: $10) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $54.50 | $31.00 | $112.60 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 13 | 18 | 26 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
TGTX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
ZNTL vs TGTX vs RCUS vs KYMR vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZNTL or TGTX or RCUS or KYMR or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the stronger pick with 87. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZNTL or TGTX or RCUS or KYMR or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus TG Therapeutics, Inc. at 17. 9x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZNTL or TGTX or RCUS or KYMR or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -93. 3% for Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGTX returned +605. 4% versus ZNTL's -83. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZNTL or TGTX or RCUS or KYMR or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 26β — meaning ZNTL is approximately 248% more volatile than TGTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZNTL or TGTX or RCUS or KYMR or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is pulling ahead at 87. 3% versus -100. 0% for Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TG Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 1747% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGTX leads at 504. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZNTL or TGTX or RCUS or KYMR or JPM?
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
(TGTX) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 6% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 72. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZNTL or TGTX or RCUS or KYMR or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 35. 9x for TG Therapeutics, Inc. — 21. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZNTL: 166. 7% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZNTL or TGTX or RCUS or KYMR or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. ZNTL, TGTX, RCUS, KYMR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ZNTL or TGTX or RCUS or KYMR or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ZNTL) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, ZNTL: -83. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZNTL and TGTX and RCUS and KYMR and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZNTL (Healthcare) and TGTX (Healthcare) and RCUS (Healthcare) and KYMR (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZNTL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TGTX is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while ZNTL, TGTX, RCUS, KYMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.