Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 23.1x · EV/EBITDA 20.8x · ROE 3.8%. (2006–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.0B | $301M | $264M | $295M | $148M | $244M | $265M | $416M | $381M |
| Enterprise Value | $3.4B | $3.4B | $3.3B | $1.8B | $1.4B | $1.6B | $475M | $445M | $535M | $807M | $876M |
| P/E Ratio → | 23.07 | 24.74 | 7.06 | 6.60 | 2.21 | 3.13 | 4.95 | 10.11 | — | 10.99 | 9.35 |
| P/S Ratio | 6.20 | 6.56 | 2.79 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 1.60 | 1.05 | 1.99 | 2.01 | 1.57 | 1.49 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.85 | 0.91 | 0.77 | 0.26 | 0.41 | 0.56 | 0.35 | 0.60 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.41 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | 9.77 | — | — | 5.21 | 2.78 | 3.47 | 5.93 |
| P/OCF | 5.21 | 5.52 | 4.28 | 1.59 | 1.57 | 2.81 | 1.95 | 4.58 | 2.71 | 3.41 | 2.46 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 16.93 | 8.92 | 4.96 | 4.71 | 8.58 | 3.37 | 3.63 | 4.05 | 3.05 | 3.42 |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.78 | 21.23 | 11.24 | 7.57 | 6.50 | 12.63 | 4.73 | 5.32 | 6.19 | 5.15 | 5.41 |
| EV / EBIT | 31.68 | 31.71 | 16.94 | 11.75 | 10.40 | 22.23 | 10.05 | 11.10 | 13.61 | 12.40 | 11.54 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | 52.18 | — | — | 9.50 | 5.61 | 6.73 | 13.64 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 56.0% | 56.0% | 56.3% | 48.7% | 48.9% | 43.3% | 38.6% | 37.2% | 34.1% | 27.9% | 32.0% |
| Operating Margin | 52.3% | 52.3% | 51.7% | 41.8% | 45.3% | 38.6% | 33.5% | 32.7% | 29.8% | 25.6% | 29.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 26.3% | 26.3% | 52.0% | 12.9% | 41.9% | 53.2% | 21.6% | 19.7% | -5.5% | 14.3% | 20.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 3.8% | 3.8% | 15.3% | 5.1% | 21.6% | 20.7% | 7.3% | 3.8% | -0.8% | 4.1% | 5.5% |
| ROA | 1.3% | 1.3% | 5.3% | 1.8% | 6.5% | 7.3% | 4.0% | 2.3% | -0.5% | 2.5% | 3.3% |
| ROIC | 2.2% | 2.2% | 4.6% | 5.1% | 5.6% | 4.2% | 5.2% | 3.4% | 2.4% | 3.7% | 4.0% |
| ROCE | 2.8% | 2.8% | 5.6% | 6.2% | 7.5% | 5.7% | 6.8% | 4.2% | 3.0% | 4.7% | 5.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.66 | 1.66 | 1.92 | 1.43 | 2.02 | 2.49 | 0.89 | 0.64 | 0.33 | 0.49 | 0.65 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 14.92 | 14.92 | 8.80 | 7.12 | 5.95 | 10.43 | 3.73 | 3.09 | 3.37 | 2.90 | 3.71 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.44 | 1.69 | 1.26 | 1.79 | 2.45 | 0.77 | 0.49 | 0.31 | 0.42 | 0.53 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 13.01 | 13.01 | 7.72 | 6.30 | 5.28 | 10.27 | 3.26 | 2.40 | 3.12 | 2.49 | 3.06 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | 42.41 | — | — | 4.29 | 2.83 | 3.26 | 7.71 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.39 | 1.45 | 2.44 | 3.54 | 2.82 | 2.36 | 2.07 | 3.26 | 3.13 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.67 | 1.20 | 1.40 | 0.29 | 0.94 | 1.02 | 0.56 | 0.86 | 1.28 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.42 | 1.42 | 1.65 | 1.18 | 1.35 | 0.25 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.81 | 1.23 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.29 | 1.02 | 1.22 | 0.16 | 0.77 | 0.90 | 0.18 | 0.51 | 1.16 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.18 | 0.16 |
| Inventory Turnover | 21.33 | 21.33 | 33.36 | 61.52 | 22.44 | 20.91 | 24.50 | 52.43 | 57.36 | 35.84 | 36.59 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 14.43 | 4.92 | 3.55 | 7.00 | 14.76 | 9.33 | 11.22 | 44.60 | 6.59 | 3.56 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.5% | 1.4% | 3.3% | 4.1% | 4.5% | 2.5% | 11.3% | 9.4% | 15.4% | 9.6% | 14.7% |
| Payout Ratio | 35.5% | 35.5% | 17.6% | 26.3% | 9.5% | 7.6% | 55.2% | 94.7% | — | 105.1% | 108.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.3% | 4.0% | 14.2% | 15.1% | 45.3% | 31.9% | 20.2% | 9.9% | — | 9.1% | 10.7% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | 10.2% | — | — | 19.2% | 36.0% | 28.8% | 16.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.4% | 2.2% | 1.5% | 0.0% | 47.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.5% | 1.4% | 3.3% | 5.4% | 6.8% | 4.1% | 11.3% | 57.2% | 15.4% | 9.6% | 14.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $59M | $56M | $21M | $19M | $18M | $18M | $18M | $18M | $18M | $17M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 20 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CCEC stock.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 23.1x. The historical average is 10.7x. This places it at the 88th percentile of its historical range.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s current EV/EBITDA is 20.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.1x.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is 3.8%. The historical average is 10.3%.
Based on historical data, Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. is trading at a P/E of 23.1x. This is at the 88th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s current dividend yield is 1.53% with a payout ratio of 35.5%.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. has 56.0% gross margin and 52.3% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 14.9x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Fleet transition execution risk
Margin Resilience Amid Revenue Collapse
Despite a 44.9% revenue decline, gross margin held at 53.9% in Q4 2025, per reported figures, reflecting the pass-through cost structure of time charters. Operating margin remained above 50%, underscoring high operating leverage.
The stability of gross and operating margins during a period of sharp revenue contraction suggests that the legacy container divestitures were not margin-dilutive, and the remaining LNG fleet operates with favorable charter terms. However, net margin volatility—swinging from 59.4% in Q4 2024 to 23.9% in Q4 2025—is heavily influenced by one-time gains on vessel sales, which obscures underlying earning power. Investors should focus on operating margin as the cleaner measure of core profitability, as it excludes these non-recurring items and remains consistently above 50%.
Returns Decay as Asset Base Expands
ROIC has fallen from 2.9% in 2022Q4 to 1.0% in 2026Q2, according to the ratio data, while total assets grew to $4.7B. This suggests the massive LNG newbuild capex is not yet generating proportional returns.
The decline in ROIC is a direct consequence of the balance sheet expanding ahead of revenue contribution from new LNG vessels. With ROE at just 1.9% in Q2 2026, the company is earning returns far below its cost of capital, which may indicate that the market is pricing in future improvements rather than current performance. The driver is not margin deterioration—margins are stable—but rather asset turnover, which has collapsed to 0.02 as the asset base has ballooned. This implies that returns will only inflect once the newbuild fleet is fully delivered and employed under charters, a process that extends through 2027.
Working Capital Efficiency Hides Capex Strain
The cash conversion cycle improved to -3 days in Q2 2026, per the ratio data, driven by negative DSO and DIO, indicating efficient working capital management. However, this masks the massive cash outflows for newbuild capex.
The negative CCC, supported by DPO of 22 days exceeding DSO of 9 days, suggests that CCEC is effectively using supplier financing to fund its operations, a common feature in shipping where charter payments are received in advance. Yet this efficiency is overshadowed by the capital-intensive nature of the business: free cash flow margin swung to -6.1% in Q2 2026 as capex surged to $751.5M. The working capital metrics provide little insight into the company's true cash generation capacity, which is dominated by the timing of vessel deliveries and associated financing.
Debt Burden Intensifies Ahead of Deliveries
Debt-to-equity rose to 1.89 in Q2 2026 from 1.66 in Q4 2025, per the balance sheet data, while interest coverage fell to 2.15x. This indicates increasing financial leverage and thinner coverage as the LNG newbuild program progresses.
The rising D/E ratio, combined with a D/EBITDA of 35.21x, suggests that EBITDA is currently insufficient to service the debt load, though this is partly a function of the transition period where legacy revenue has been sold off and LNG earnings have not yet ramped. Interest coverage of 2.15x is below the 3x threshold often considered comfortable, implying that a modest decline in charter rates or an increase in interest rates could strain debt service. The company's $310M cash cushion provides some buffer, but it is likely earmarked for newbuild installments, limiting its availability for debt reduction. Investors should monitor refinancing risk as the company approaches peak capex.
Liquidity Buffer Thins as Cash Deploys
The current ratio fell to 1.15 in Q2 2026 from 1.44 in Q4 2025, per the ratio data, while cash declined to $252.7M. This suggests a tightening liquidity position ahead of scheduled newbuild payments.
The quick ratio of 1.13 indicates that inventory is not a significant liquidity concern, as expected for a shipping company. However, the declining current ratio and cash balance point to a growing reliance on operating cash flow and external financing to meet near-term obligations. Given the negative free cash flow in Q2 2026, the company may need to draw on credit facilities or raise additional capital if cash reserves are insufficient to cover upcoming installments. The liquidity position appears adequate for now, but it warrants close monitoring as the capex program peaks.
P/E Misleads During Transition
The trailing P/E of 24.58 is distorted by one-time gains and the revenue trough, while the forward P/E of 11.63 better reflects normalized earnings. As reported in the valuation data, EV/EBITDA of 21.29 also overstates the cost of the business.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for CCEC is the P/E multiple, because current earnings are depressed by the fleet transition and inflated by non-recurring gains on vessel sales. The trailing P/E of 24.58 appears expensive, but the forward P/E of 11.63 suggests the market is pricing in a recovery as new LNG vessels commence charters. Similarly, EV/EBITDA of 21.29 is misleading because EBITDA is temporarily low; the forward EV/EBITDA of 10.20 is more indicative of the company's future earning power. Investors should use EV/EBITDA on forward estimates or price-to-book (0.91) to assess value, as the latter reflects the asset-heavy nature of the business and the potential for asset revaluation.