Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -31.1%. (2021–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $26M | $5M | $11M | $119M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $66M | $45M | $51M | $144M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.29 | — | — | 6.52 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.26 | 0.23 | 0.40 | 2.96 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.35 | 4.17 | — |
| P/FCF | 203.54 | 37.42 | 6.38 | 67.63 | — |
| P/OCF | 6.91 | 1.27 | 1.23 | 6.38 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.22 | 1.91 | 3.58 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 6.44 | 7.00 | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 9.10 | 7.43 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 358.11 | 30.67 | 81.77 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 79.7% | 79.7% | 100.0% | 87.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -19.0% | -19.0% | 19.5% | 43.2% | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -44.8% | -44.8% | -15.0% | 45.5% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -31.1% | -31.1% | -13.6% | 127.9% | -12.4% |
| ROA | -8.9% | -8.9% | -4.9% | 56.3% | -4.1% |
| ROIC | -4.1% | -4.1% | 6.3% | 48.7% | — |
| ROCE | -5.2% | -5.2% | 7.4% | 57.3% | -12.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.44 | 0.94 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 5.54 | 1.31 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.45 | 1.32 | 0.87 | -0.35 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 5.10 | 1.21 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 320.70 | 24.29 | 14.13 | — |
| Interest Coverage | -0.25 | -0.25 | 1.38 | 18.00 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.34 | 1.30 | 1.49 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.34 | 1.30 | 1.49 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.17 | 0.48 | 0.17 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.20 | 0.27 | 0.62 | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 32.09 | 29.85 | 27.83 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | 1.7% | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | 10.9% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 15.3% | — |
| FCF Yield | 0.5% | 2.7% | 15.7% | 1.5% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 1.7% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $6M | $5M | $12M | $12M |
Liquidity and operational scale
According to recent financial data, EONR trades at a price-to-book ratio of 0.10, suggesting that the market is heavily discounting the company's asset base relative to its historical cost, likely reflecting deep skepticism regarding the firm's ability to generate future earnings from its mature Permian acreage.
The absence of a meaningful P/E ratio and the elevated P/FCF of 207.83 indicate that investors are currently valuing the company as a distressed asset play rather than a growth-oriented energy producer. This valuation gap suggests that the market may be pricing in significant impairment risks or the potential for future equity dilution to sustain operations.
Based on reported figures, EONR's ROIC has struggled to maintain positive territory, oscillating between -3.4% and 2.3% over the last ten quarters, which highlights the difficulty of compounding capital in a mature field where production decline rates frequently outpace the returns on new well workovers.
The inconsistency in ROIC suggests that the company is failing to achieve the necessary scale to overcome its fixed-cost burden. Investors should monitor whether management can improve the injection-to-production ratio, as current returns appear insufficient to justify the capital intensity required to maintain the 207-well injection network.
As reported in financial statements, EONR's asset turnover has remained consistently low at approximately 0.05, revealing a structural inability to generate meaningful revenue from its existing asset base compared to the capital-intensive nature of its Permian Basin infrastructure requirements.
The extremely high days payable outstanding, which has reached as high as 1,408 days in recent periods, suggests that the company may be relying on extended supplier credit to manage its liquidity constraints. This reliance on vendor financing warrants further investigation into the sustainability of current operational relationships.
According to recent SEC filings, EONR's current ratio has languished between 0.12 and 0.35, indicating a severe lack of short-term liquidity that leaves the company highly vulnerable to any unexpected operational disruptions or fluctuations in regional commodity price differentials within the Permian Basin.
The persistent inability to maintain a current ratio above 1.0 suggests that the company is operating with almost no margin for error. This liquidity profile appears to limit management's ability to pursue aggressive production optimization, forcing a focus on survival rather than long-term value creation.
Based on an analysis of the company's business model, the most commonly misapplied metric is the P/S ratio, which obscures the reality that EONR's revenue is tied to a declining asset base that requires constant, high-cost capital reinvestment to maintain even baseline production levels.
Investors often use P/S to gauge relative value, but this ignores the 'treadmill' effect where a significant portion of revenue must be immediately recycled into well workovers. A more appropriate metric would be the ratio of operating cash flow to total capital expenditure, which better captures the true cash-generative potential of the underlying reservoir.
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EONR stock.
EON Resources Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.3x. The historical average is 6.5x.
EON Resources Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -31.1%. The historical average is 17.7%.
Based on historical data, EON Resources Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
EON Resources Inc. has 79.7% gross margin and -19.0% operating margin.