Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -80.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -36.6%. (2013–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.7B | $5.7B | $2.8B | $3.3B | $2.8B | $3.5B | $6.6B | $1.7B | $1.7B | $1.3B | $159M |
| Enterprise Value | $4.2B | $6.2B | $3.1B | $3.4B | $2.9B | $3.4B | $6.6B | $1.8B | $1.7B | $1.3B | $139M |
| P/E Ratio → | -80.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 4.92 | 7.60 | 4.75 | 6.63 | 6.82 | 10.69 | 24.83 | 8.02 | 11.27 | 12.79 | 2.47 |
| P/B Ratio | 23.41 | 37.18 | 30.94 | 15.55 | 11.69 | 12.35 | 19.27 | 12.70 | 30.49 | 15.94 | 1.71 |
| P/FCF | 106.38 | 164.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 45.41 | 70.23 | 829.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 8.26 | 5.29 | 6.82 | 6.95 | 10.66 | 24.96 | 8.52 | 11.37 | 13.05 | 2.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 178.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 70.6% | 70.6% | 68.9% | 67.3% | 68.5% | 66.2% | 73.5% | 75.5% | 73.7% | 71.5% | 67.4% |
| Operating Margin | -4.9% | -4.9% | -19.5% | -25.4% | -27.7% | -31.0% | -16.5% | -25.5% | -31.0% | -27.8% | -24.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -6.0% | -6.0% | -19.1% | -25.0% | -28.3% | -31.4% | -16.5% | -25.4% | -34.2% | -30.0% | -32.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -36.6% | -36.6% | -75.3% | -54.9% | -44.7% | -32.6% | -18.4% | -57.5% | -75.2% | -34.6% | -22.6% |
| ROA | -4.6% | -4.6% | -16.6% | -28.0% | -25.5% | -20.8% | -10.7% | -25.6% | -39.9% | -21.9% | -23.7% |
| ROIC | -5.2% | -5.2% | -24.3% | -31.5% | -30.4% | -23.2% | -10.6% | -26.3% | -39.4% | -23.3% | — |
| ROCE | -4.4% | -4.4% | -20.2% | -36.5% | -31.0% | -24.3% | -12.5% | -31.9% | -45.3% | -23.3% | -20.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 4.79 | 4.79 | 8.11 | 0.62 | 0.55 | 0.42 | 0.36 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 0.43 | 0.35 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 3.24 | 3.49 | 0.45 | 0.22 | -0.04 | 0.10 | 0.80 | 0.27 | 0.32 | -0.21 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 14.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -2.31 | -2.31 | -7.79 | -32.60 | -27.01 | -85.39 | -27.70 | -32.17 | -15.16 | -7.78 | -5.44 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.63 | 4.63 | 5.82 | 2.15 | 3.24 | 3.48 | 5.75 | 3.32 | 3.52 | 5.72 | 8.98 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.48 | 4.48 | 5.70 | 2.02 | 3.07 | 3.36 | 5.67 | 3.24 | 3.45 | 5.64 | 8.87 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.84 | 3.84 | 4.83 | 1.25 | 2.39 | 2.72 | 5.10 | 2.70 | 2.59 | 4.89 | 8.02 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.73 | 0.64 | 1.14 | 0.92 | 0.70 | 0.52 | 0.70 | 1.23 | 0.74 | 0.46 |
| Inventory Turnover | 10.16 | 10.16 | 13.13 | 11.51 | 8.53 | 10.64 | 13.23 | 13.00 | 18.81 | 16.76 | 15.02 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 36.98 | 49.30 | 45.55 | 44.34 | 52.50 | 41.20 | 40.60 | 49.05 | 47.69 | 53.58 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 0.9% | 0.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $32M | $31M | $31M | $30M | $29M | $28M | $25M | $24M | $23M | $5M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 13 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying IRTC stock.
iRhythm Technologies, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -80.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
iRhythm Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -36.6%. The historical average is -84.5%.
Based on historical data, iRhythm Technologies, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -80.4x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
iRhythm Technologies, Inc. has 70.6% gross margin and -4.9% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Reimbursement and regulatory overhang
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Inflection Nears Breakeven
Gross margin expanded to 72.8% in 2026Q2 from 66.3% in 2024Q1, while operating margin improved to -1.1% from -28.9%, per reported financials, signaling a potential inflection.
The steady gross margin expansion from 66.3% to 72.8% over ten quarters reflects scale benefits and cost efficiencies in the Zio service model. Operating margin improvement to -1.1% in 2026Q2, from -28.9% in 2024Q1, suggests that fixed costs are being absorbed by higher volumes, though the company remains unprofitable on a GAAP basis. The 2025Q4 positive operating income of $8.8M appears to be a turning point, but sustainability depends on maintaining reimbursement rates and controlling clinical labor costs.
Return on Capital Still Negative
ROIC improved from -13.2% in 2024Q3 to -0.3% in 2026Q2, but remains negative, indicating the company has yet to generate positive returns on invested capital, per reported figures.
Despite the improvement, ROIC remains negative at -0.3% in 2026Q2, reflecting that the company is still investing heavily in growth and has not yet achieved profitability. The trend from -13.2% to -0.3% suggests that the business is approaching a breakeven point, but the negative returns indicate that capital deployed has not yet yielded positive returns. Investors should monitor whether the company can sustain this trajectory and eventually generate positive ROIC, which would validate the capital allocation strategy.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves
Cash conversion cycle shortened to 49 days in 2026Q2 from 67 days in 2024Q1, driven by faster collections and lower inventory days, as reported in financial statements.
The CCC improvement from 67 to 49 days over ten quarters indicates better working capital management, with DSO declining from 52 to 34 days and DIO increasing slightly from 30 to 35 days. The reduction in DSO suggests improved billing and collection processes, while the stable DIO reflects efficient inventory management. However, DPO remains low at 19 days, indicating limited supplier leverage, which may be a structural characteristic of the device manufacturing model.
Leverage Eases but Debt Persists
Debt-to-equity improved to 3.91 in 2026Q2 from 8.16 in 2024Q1, but total debt remains high at $727.3M, with interest coverage of 0.88, per SEC filings.
The D/E ratio has improved significantly, but the absolute debt level remains substantial, and interest coverage of 0.88 in 2026Q2 indicates that operating income is barely sufficient to cover interest expenses. The improvement in D/E is partly due to equity growth from external capital, not retained earnings, as the accumulated deficit deepened. The stability of debt levels over ten quarters suggests potential refinancing needs, which could be costly in a high-rate environment, warranting close monitoring.
Liquidity Cushion Thins
Current ratio fell to 3.87 in 2026Q2 from 7.10 in 2024Q1, while cash declined from $520.4M to $246.7M, indicating a shrinking but still adequate buffer, per quarterly disclosures.
The current ratio remains above 3, suggesting adequate short-term liquidity, but the trend is concerning as cash reserves have more than halved over ten quarters. The decline in cash is partly due to operating losses and investments in growth, though the positive FCF in 2026Q2 may help stabilize the position. Under severe stress, the company could face liquidity constraints if revenue growth stalls or reimbursement cuts materialize, but the current ratio suggests near-term solvency is not at risk.
Misapplied P/E on Unprofitable Model
The negative P/E of -90.96 is often misapplied to IRTC, obscuring the company's cash-generative potential; EV/EBITDA and P/FCF provide better valuation context, as per reported figures.
Given IRTC's lack of GAAP profitability, the P/E ratio is not meaningful and can mislead investors about the company's value. The forward EV/EBITDA of 22.98 and P/FCF of 120.37 indicate that the market is pricing in significant future growth and margin expansion. The company's ability to generate positive operating cash flow despite net losses suggests that EBITDA and FCF are more relevant metrics for valuation. Investors should focus on these metrics and the trajectory toward profitability rather than the negative P/E.