Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 355.1x · EV/EBITDA 94.7x · ROE 1.3%. (1998–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8.7B | $13.4B | $4.0B | $2.6B | $1.3B | $2.5B | $3.3B | $2.0B | $1.5B | $948M | $454M |
| Enterprise Value | $8.2B | $13.0B | $4.0B | $2.9B | $1.5B | $2.5B | $3.2B | $2.1B | $1.6B | $1.1B | $817M |
| P/E Ratio → | 355.08 | 597.69 | 241.09 | — | — | — | 40.94 | 163.73 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 6.43 | 9.98 | 3.52 | 2.55 | 1.46 | 3.06 | 4.35 | 2.74 | 2.42 | 1.26 | 0.68 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.00 | 6.74 | 2.96 | 2.65 | 1.38 | 2.59 | 3.46 | 3.34 | 2.88 | 1.85 | 1.64 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | 206.70 | — | — | 304.29 | 531.54 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | 80.52 | 40.58 | — | 80.62 | 69.87 | 65.56 | 82.59 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 9.68 | 3.48 | 2.79 | 1.70 | 3.05 | 4.31 | 2.98 | 2.60 | 1.48 | 1.22 |
| EV / EBITDA | 94.73 | 149.78 | 48.88 | 38.18 | 40.21 | 39.51 | 50.93 | 29.23 | 33.26 | 67.78 | 194.41 |
| EV / EBIT | 297.51 | 292.84 | 94.83 | 88.24 | — | 88.02 | 106.04 | 54.51 | 53.02 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | 226.13 | — | — | 301.27 | 577.48 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 22.1% | 22.1% | 25.3% | 25.9% | 25.2% | 27.7% | 27.2% | 26.5% | 27.5% | 26.2% | 23.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 2.1% | 2.6% | 3.0% | -0.3% | 3.4% | 3.9% | 5.3% | 4.9% | -0.8% | -2.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.6% | 1.6% | 1.4% | -0.9% | -4.1% | -0.2% | 10.6% | 1.7% | -0.6% | -5.7% | -9.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.4% | -0.9% | -3.9% | -0.2% | 10.4% | 2.3% | -0.7% | -10.8% | -22.8% |
| ROA | 1.0% | 1.0% | 0.9% | -0.6% | -2.3% | -0.1% | 5.8% | 1.1% | -0.3% | -4.3% | -6.5% |
| ROIC | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.7% | 1.9% | -0.2% | 2.3% | 2.6% | 4.1% | 3.5% | -0.7% | -2.1% |
| ROCE | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.9% | 2.3% | -0.2% | 2.0% | 2.5% | 4.1% | 3.6% | -0.7% | -2.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.21 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.37 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 1.56 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.68 | 1.68 | 3.49 | 4.24 | 7.94 | 5.42 | 5.51 | 4.69 | 6.09 | 17.95 | 102.86 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.21 | -0.03 | 0.25 | 0.23 | -0.01 | -0.03 | 0.29 | 0.21 | 0.32 | 1.31 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -4.77 | -4.77 | -0.58 | 3.28 | 5.80 | -0.16 | -0.51 | 2.33 | 2.31 | 9.99 | 86.40 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | 19.42 | — | — | -3.02 | 45.95 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 4.24 | 4.24 | 2.74 | 1.51 | -0.80 | 1.19 | 1.29 | 1.67 | 1.40 | -0.96 | -0.49 |
Net cash position: cash ($561M) exceeds total debt ($146M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.06 | 4.06 | 2.94 | 2.03 | 2.49 | 3.43 | 3.87 | 2.86 | 3.00 | 2.49 | 1.90 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.46 | 3.46 | 2.39 | 1.50 | 1.95 | 3.01 | 3.46 | 2.52 | 2.72 | 2.23 | 1.62 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.11 | 0.25 | 0.35 | 1.58 | 1.93 | 0.94 | 1.11 | 0.69 | 0.35 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.73 | 0.70 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.57 | 5.57 | 5.24 | 4.92 | 5.36 | 6.39 | 6.71 | 8.63 | 9.58 | 11.00 | 9.30 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 123.93 | 103.98 | 115.82 | 133.40 | 128.01 | 132.88 | 134.35 | 140.21 | 103.06 | 127.73 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.4% | — | — | — | 2.4% | 0.6% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | 0.5% | — | — | 0.3% | 0.2% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $173M | $151M | $130M | $127M | $128M | $119M | $109M | $106M | $90M | $61M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying KTOS stock.
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 355.1x. The historical average is 70.6x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 94.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 33.2x.
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 1.3%. The historical average is -6.4%.
Based on historical data, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 355.1x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has 22.1% gross margin and 2.1% operating margin.
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.7x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Valuation vs. execution risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression Amid Rapid Scaling
Gross margin fell to 21.8% in 2026Q2 from 24.3% a year earlier, as reported in financial statements, while operating margin turned negative at -0.3%, indicating that revenue growth is not yet translating into bottom-line profitability.
The sequential decline in gross margin from 22.6% in 2026Q1 to 21.8% in 2026Q2 suggests a mix shift toward lower-margin production contracts, likely reflecting the initial stages of high-volume drone manufacturing. Operating margin deterioration to -0.3% in 2026Q2, despite a 30.5% revenue surge, implies that SG&A and IRAD spending are outpacing gross profit gains, consistent with the company's strategy of self-funding development. Net margin of 1.0% in 2026Q2 appears flattered by interest income on the $1.4B cash balance, masking the underlying operational thinness; investors should monitor whether margin expansion materializes as production scales.
ROIC Stagnant Despite Capital Infusion
ROIC has remained below 1% for the past ten quarters, with 2026Q2 at -0.1%, according to reported figures, despite a $1.4B equity raise, suggesting that the company is not yet generating returns above its cost of capital.
The persistent sub-1% ROIC, even as revenue accelerates, indicates that the massive capital deployed into PP&E and acquisitions has yet to yield productive returns. The slight improvement in ROIC to 0.5% in 2025Q4 was not sustained, and the negative reading in 2026Q2 suggests that operating losses are eroding the capital base. This pattern implies that the company is in a heavy investment phase, and investors should expect ROIC to remain suppressed until production volumes reach a scale that allows fixed costs to be absorbed.
Working Capital Drag Intensifies
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 141 days in 2026Q2 from 127 days a year earlier, as per financial statements, driven by DSO rising to 110 days, indicating that revenue growth is increasingly consuming cash rather than generating it.
The deterioration in DSO from 99 days in 2025Q2 to 110 days in 2026Q2 suggests that the company is taking longer to collect on government contracts, possibly due to milestone delays or the timing of large awards. DIO also increased to 59 days, reflecting inventory buildup for production ramp, while DPO remained relatively stable at 28 days, indicating limited supplier leverage. The resulting CCC of 141 days, combined with negative FCF margins in most quarters, highlights that working capital is a significant cash drag, and management's ability to tighten collections will be critical to improving cash generation.
Minimal Debt Masks Refinancing Comfort
Debt-to-equity fell to 0.06 in 2026Q2 from 0.21 a year earlier, as reported in financial statements, while D/EBITDA improved to 5.16, indicating a conservative balance sheet that provides ample financial flexibility despite thin operating margins.
The reduction in total debt from $282.0M to $193.6M over the past year, coupled with a $1.4B equity raise, has transformed the capital structure into a fortress-like position. Interest coverage, though not reported in 2026Q2, was 3.18 in 2026Q1, suggesting that debt service is manageable, but the high D/EBITDA ratio of 5.16 reflects the low EBITDA base. This low leverage implies that the company is not at risk of covenant breaches, but it also indicates that the company is relying on equity funding for growth, which could lead to further dilution.
Cash Buffer Bolstered by Equity Infusion
Current ratio surged to 5.54 in 2026Q2 from 2.94 a year earlier, according to the latest quarterly data, with cash rising to $1.4B, providing a substantial cushion against operational cash burn and funding future production ramp.
The quick ratio of 4.99 indicates that even without inventory, the company can cover current liabilities nearly five times over, reflecting the recent equity raise. This liquidity position appears robust enough to withstand continued negative free cash flow, which totaled -$200M over the last five quarters. However, the reliance on equity raises to maintain this liquidity suggests that the company's cash position is not organically generated, and investors should monitor whether the cash burn rate accelerates as production scales.
P/E Misleading for Growth-Stage Defense
The trailing P/E of 467.46 is often cited as a red flag, but for KTOS, this metric is distorted by near-zero earnings, as per market data; a more appropriate measure is EV/EBITDA, which at 126.22 still reflects a premium but better captures the company's operating performance.
The P/E ratio is nearly meaningless for a company with net margins around 1%, as small fluctuations in earnings cause outsized swings in the multiple. EV/EBITDA, while still elevated, provides a clearer picture of valuation relative to operating cash generation, though it too is inflated by the low EBITDA base. Investors should also consider price-to-sales (8.46) and forward EV/EBITDA (90.59) to gauge whether the market is pricing in a significant production ramp that has yet to materialize in financials.