Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 12.3x · EV/EBITDA 10.4x · ROE 13.2%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.4B | $3.5B | $3.8B | $4.0B | $1.3B | $1.9B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $613M | $1.1B | $758M |
| Enterprise Value | $3.8B | $3.9B | $4.0B | $4.1B | $2.0B | $2.6B | $2.0B | $1.9B | $1.4B | $1.7B | $1.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 12.31 | 8.68 | 6.75 | 8.50 | 2.68 | 4.68 | 5.38 | 8.78 | 5.70 | 15.22 | 13.68 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.84 | 0.98 | 0.32 | 0.50 | 0.42 | 0.45 | 0.27 | 0.54 | 0.45 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.14 | 1.10 | 1.29 | 1.57 | 0.63 | 1.14 | 1.03 | 1.12 | 0.72 | 1.41 | 1.16 |
| P/FCF | 24.83 | 28.97 | 22.19 | 7.24 | 7.52 | — | 8.24 | 18.34 | — | — | 35.95 |
| P/OCF | 26.02 | 26.84 | 21.16 | 7.16 | 7.14 | — | 7.67 | 17.07 | — | — | 22.18 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.88 | 0.89 | 1.03 | 0.48 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.62 | 0.87 | 0.81 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.36 | 7.44 | 5.57 | 6.94 | 3.07 | 4.95 | 5.84 | 9.19 | 8.08 | 10.90 | 11.08 |
| EV / EBIT | 7.48 | 7.13 | 5.48 | 6.82 | 3.14 | 5.15 | 6.11 | 10.07 | 8.27 | 11.92 | 12.31 |
| EV / FCF | — | 32.26 | 23.45 | 7.58 | 11.47 | — | 12.48 | 30.89 | — | — | 64.56 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 23.0% | 26.6% | 25.2% | 25.3% | 24.3% | 22.5% | 19.8% | 19.4% | 20.0% | 19.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.5% | 11.5% | 15.7% | 14.4% | 15.4% | 13.8% | — | 7.7% | 7.1% | 7.5% | 6.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 9.1% | 9.1% | 12.5% | 11.6% | 11.9% | 10.6% | 7.9% | 5.1% | 4.7% | 3.7% | 3.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 13.2% | 13.2% | 20.7% | 20.3% | 26.6% | 27.5% | 21.2% | 13.7% | 13.4% | 10.3% | 9.1% |
| ROA | 8.6% | 8.6% | 13.2% | 12.0% | 14.1% | 13.5% | 10.1% | 6.2% | 5.5% | 4.2% | 3.8% |
| ROIC | 11.3% | 11.3% | 18.1% | 16.0% | 18.5% | 18.0% | — | 8.4% | 8.0% | 8.2% | 6.9% |
| ROCE | 11.4% | 11.4% | 17.6% | 16.3% | 20.3% | 19.7% | — | 10.1% | 9.1% | 9.3% | 8.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.48 | 0.62 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.96 | 1.08 | 0.97 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.08 | 2.08 | 1.44 | 1.54 | 1.53 | 1.90 | 2.76 | 3.76 | 4.69 | 5.14 | 5.19 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.33 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.76 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 0.92 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 1.06 | 1.46 | 1.98 | 3.73 | 4.57 | 4.18 | 4.91 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.29 | 1.26 | 0.34 | 3.94 | — | 4.24 | 12.55 | — | — | 28.61 |
| Interest Coverage | 27.28 | 27.28 | 26.66 | — | 283.31 | 237.14 | 33.02 | 8.77 | 8.34 | 7.61 | 6.29 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 24.19 | 24.19 | 15.98 | 13.10 | 10.75 | 8.41 | 9.34 | 12.11 | 11.41 | 12.10 | 11.20 |
| Quick Ratio | 5.92 | 5.92 | 4.44 | 3.44 | 1.96 | 1.60 | 2.09 | 1.19 | 1.17 | 2.25 | 1.50 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.80 | 3.80 | 3.07 | 2.53 | 0.97 | 0.67 | 1.01 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 1.06 | 0.27 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.11 | 1.16 | 1.15 | 1.19 | 1.13 | 1.05 | 1.09 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.03 | 1.03 | 1.07 | 1.08 | 1.09 | 1.18 | 1.26 | 1.15 | 1.10 | 1.11 | 1.12 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.3% | 0.6% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.1% | 11.5% | 14.8% | 11.8% | 37.3% | 21.4% | 18.6% | 11.4% | 17.6% | 6.6% | 7.3% |
| FCF Yield | 4.0% | 3.5% | 4.5% | 13.8% | 13.3% | — | 12.1% | 5.5% | — | — | 2.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 6.0% | 5.8% | 4.7% | 1.7% | 4.2% | 2.8% | 0.1% | 0.5% | 4.2% | 4.8% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.0% | 5.8% | 4.7% | 1.7% | 4.2% | 2.8% | 0.1% | 0.5% | 4.2% | 5.1% | 0.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $27M | $29M | $29M | $28M | $30M | $29M | $28M | $29M | $31M | $30M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MHO stock.
M/I Homes, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 12.3x. The historical average is 9.2x. This places it at the 76th percentile of its historical range.
M/I Homes, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 10.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.4x.
M/I Homes, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 13.2%. The historical average is 10.8%.
Based on historical data, M/I Homes, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 12.3x. This is at the 76th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
M/I Homes, Inc. has 23.0% gross margin and 11.5% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
M/I Homes, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.1x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Inventory build draining operating cash
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Cheap Multiples Mask Cash Drag
At a trailing P/E of 8.45 versus Taylor Morrison's 9.32 and Green Brick's 9.07, MHO screens as the cheapest homebuilder in the peer set, yet the forward P/E of 11.06 sitting above the trailing figure implies analysts model further earnings contraction, per consensus estimates.
The 1.08 price-to-book ratio sits above Century Communities at 0.67 and LGI Homes at 0.47 but below Green Brick's 1.46, which suggests the market is valuing MHO's retained-earnings-built equity close to par while applying steeper discounts to peers at either end of the return spectrum. The wide gap between an 8.45 trailing P/E and a 26.58 price-to-free-cash-flow multiple implies the perceived cheapness rests on reported earnings rather than realized cash, so a P/E-only value screen may overstate the discount. A PEG of 0.68 also looks undemanding, but with five consecutive quarters of negative revenue growth, the growth input is likely drawn from a stale period and may not anchor the ratio reliably.
Six Quarters of Margin Erosion
Gross margin has compressed from 27.8% in 2024Q2 to 20.9% in 2026Q3, a 690 basis point decline, with operating margin halving to 7.7% over the same span, according to M/I Homes' quarterly income statements; net margin of 6.2% now sits below Taylor Morrison's 9.6% and Green Brick's 15.4%.
Operating margin fell 180 basis points between 2026Q2 and 2026Q3 while gross margin declined only 120 basis points, implying overhead has not scaled down alongside the shrinking gross profit base, which amplifies downside in a volume contraction. On that basis, sustainable earning power may be closer to the latest 6.2% net margin than the roughly 9% average of the past ten quarters, so trailing multiples built on that average may be flattering. Because sales incentives and mortgage rate buy-downs are embedded in cost of sales rather than disclosed separately, the reported gross margin may not represent a floor if affordability conditions remain stressed.
Capital Returns Halve in Two Years
ROIC has fallen from 5.0% in 2024Q2 to 1.8% in 2026Q3 and ROE from 5.5% to 2.1%, per M/I Homes' reported return metrics, with the deterioration appearing to stem from both margin compression and an asset turnover slip from 0.26 to 0.22.
The simultaneous decline in turnover suggests capital is being absorbed into inventory faster than it converts into closings, which is consistent with the working capital draws visible in the cash flow statements rather than an efficiency gain deferred to future periods. Because debt-to-equity fell from 0.36 to 0.30 over the same window, the ROE erosion appears driven by operating returns rather than leverage, meaning balance sheet engineering cannot readily reverse it. The 13.2% trailing ROE cited in recent management commentary sits above the sum of the four most recent quarterly prints near 10%, a discrepancy in period or definition that warrants verification before being used as evidence of compounding.
Low Leverage Meets Weakening Coverage
Debt-to-equity has eased from 0.36 to 0.30 over ten quarters while total debt hovered near $1 billion, yet D/EBITDA has roughly doubled from 5.13 to 10.83 and interest coverage swung as low as 2.51, based on M/I Homes' quarterly ratio disclosures.
The improving debt-to-equity ratio appears to reflect equity accumulation from retained earnings rather than any reduction in absolute debt, so it should not be read as meaningful de-risking of the liability side. Interest coverage is unavailable in four of the ten quarters shown, and the swing from 36.58 down to 2.51 and back to 25.28 makes any directional read low-conviction and dependent on quarterly earnings volatility. Because capitalized interest is deferred into cost of sales rather than expensed, reported coverage may flatter the cash interest burden actually serviced from operations, which investors should weigh against the D/EBITDA trend.
Current Ratio Halves as Cash Recedes
The current ratio has fallen from 15.98 in 2024Q4 to 5.42 in 2026Q3 and the quick ratio to 1.04, while cash declined to $620.6 million from $837.5 million, per M/I Homes' balance sheets, marking a pronounced shift toward inventory-heavy working capital.
A quick ratio of 1.04 against a current ratio of 5.42 implies nearly all short-term assets are homes and land under development, so stress resilience hinges on whether that inventory can be liquidated near carrying value in a demand shock. Days-in-inventory prints are unusually erratic, showing 25 days in 2026Q2 against a 200-350 day range elsewhere, and the cash conversion cycle field is unavailable across all periods, so working capital timing conclusions warrant caution. Even so, the 5.42 current ratio remains high relative to what a typical manufacturer would carry, and the direction of travel, alongside a second consecutive quarterly cash decline, is what investors should monitor.
EV/EBITDA Masks Land Capital Drag
MHO's EV/EBITDA of 6.85 looks inexpensive next to Champion Homes' 14.74, yet the multiple ignores that land and inventory investment flows through working capital rather than capex, so EBITDA overstates true capital returns, as reflected in the 26.58 trailing P/FCF versus an 8.45 P/E gap.
Over the past ten quarters, roughly $1.04 billion of net income converted into about $360 million of operating cash flow, an implied OCF-to-net-income ratio near 0.35 that no EBITDA multiple captures, according to the company's cash flow statements. Investors should substitute free cash flow yield and ROIC measured against invested capital including inventory, alongside backlog conversion and absorption data, rather than leaning on EV/EBITDA to judge economic returns. Capitalized interest compounds the distortion by deferring debt service into cost of sales, which mechanically lifts EBITDA relative to the actual cash cost of leverage and further flatters the multiple.