Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 40.9x · EV/EBITDA 17.7x · ROE 8.7%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.2B | $5.3B | $5.7B | $4.4B | $4.1B | $3.6B | $3.1B | $1.8B | $3.0B | $2.2B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $5.6B | $5.8B | $6.2B | $4.7B | $4.3B | $3.8B | $3.5B | $2.2B | $3.3B | $2.4B | $1.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 40.88 | 41.38 | 47.65 | 46.89 | 54.74 | 74.17 | — | 322.19 | 71.55 | 78.55 | 58.89 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.43 | 3.52 | 4.23 | 3.53 | 3.54 | 3.32 | 3.19 | 1.76 | 3.41 | 2.97 | 1.97 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.32 | 3.36 | 4.16 | 3.69 | 3.56 | 3.44 | 3.21 | 1.85 | 3.23 | 3.20 | 2.39 |
| P/FCF | 24.44 | 25.07 | 31.42 | 40.87 | 58.80 | 29.96 | 26.53 | — | 149.03 | 100.54 | 64.11 |
| P/OCF | 17.47 | 17.92 | 26.00 | 30.54 | 35.63 | 24.27 | 18.62 | 22.56 | 34.78 | 34.50 | 22.18 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.81 | 4.54 | 3.77 | 3.73 | 3.56 | 3.60 | 2.26 | 3.78 | 3.31 | 2.47 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.69 | 18.11 | 22.78 | 21.03 | 23.89 | 24.45 | 32.95 | 18.75 | 26.04 | 27.82 | 19.00 |
| EV / EBIT | 30.61 | 29.27 | 38.68 | 37.12 | 48.27 | 64.74 | — | 150.81 | 55.74 | 55.27 | 43.71 |
| EV / FCF | — | 27.19 | 33.70 | 43.68 | 62.00 | 32.12 | 29.90 | — | 165.26 | 111.98 | 80.56 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 48.7% | 48.7% | 47.4% | 46.4% | 45.1% | 45.2% | 41.6% | 43.5% | 44.7% | 44.8% | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | 12.2% | 12.2% | 11.5% | 9.9% | 7.6% | 5.7% | -0.2% | 1.6% | 6.6% | 4.5% | 5.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 8.5% | 8.5% | 8.9% | 7.5% | 6.5% | 4.5% | -1.0% | 0.5% | 4.8% | 3.8% | 3.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 8.7% | 8.7% | 9.3% | 8.0% | 6.8% | 4.8% | -1.0% | 0.6% | 5.2% | 4.7% | 4.2% |
| ROA | 5.0% | 5.0% | 5.1% | 4.7% | 4.5% | 2.9% | -0.6% | 0.3% | 3.1% | 2.7% | 2.3% |
| ROIC | 7.2% | 7.2% | 7.1% | 6.5% | 4.9% | 3.5% | -0.1% | 0.9% | 4.0% | 2.9% | 3.6% |
| ROCE | 7.9% | 7.9% | 7.2% | 7.0% | 6.1% | 4.2% | -0.1% | 1.0% | 4.8% | 3.6% | 4.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.74 | 0.24 | 0.31 | 0.47 | 0.56 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.65 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.82 | 2.82 | 2.94 | 3.96 | 1.56 | 2.08 | 4.26 | 4.47 | 3.08 | 3.21 | 4.13 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.41 | 0.52 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.61 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.41 | 1.41 | 1.55 | 1.35 | 1.23 | 1.65 | 3.72 | 4.10 | 2.56 | 2.84 | 3.88 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.12 | 2.29 | 2.81 | 3.20 | 2.16 | 3.37 | — | 16.23 | 11.43 | 16.46 |
| Interest Coverage | 7.46 | 7.46 | 5.10 | 8.23 | 14.04 | 11.25 | -0.32 | 1.17 | 5.78 | 5.64 | 3.89 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.34 | 4.34 | 4.27 | 5.45 | 2.40 | 2.04 | 2.32 | 2.50 | 2.45 | 2.73 | 2.76 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.95 | 2.95 | 2.85 | 3.95 | 1.19 | 1.10 | 1.25 | 1.26 | 1.32 | 1.39 | 1.39 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.87 | 1.87 | 1.74 | 2.89 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.24 | 0.38 | 0.28 | 0.22 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.64 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.33 | 2.33 | 2.33 | 2.22 | 2.38 | 2.66 | 2.84 | 2.49 | 2.47 | 2.59 | 2.81 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 53.88 | 56.28 | 54.94 | 56.59 | 58.70 | 59.82 | 61.83 | 62.02 | 58.26 | 52.34 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.4% | 2.4% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 1.8% | 1.3% | — | 0.3% | 1.4% | 1.3% | 1.7% |
| FCF Yield | 4.1% | 4.0% | 3.2% | 2.4% | 1.7% | 3.3% | 3.8% | — | 0.7% | 1.0% | 1.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $60M | $59M | $58M | $58M | $57M | $55M | $56M | $54M | $50M | $45M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MMSI stock.
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 40.9x. The historical average is 39.1x. This places it at the 64th percentile of its historical range.
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 17.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 16.2x.
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 8.7%. The historical average is 8.4%.
Based on historical data, Merit Medical Systems, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 40.9x. This is at the 64th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Merit Medical Systems, Inc. has 48.7% gross margin and 12.2% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.8x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Divestiture impact on growth
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Nears 52%
Gross margin reached 51.4% in 2026Q2, up from 47.7% in 2024Q2, reflecting improved product mix and cost efficiencies, as reported in quarterly financial statements. Operating margin expanded to 14.5% from 12.2% year-over-year.
The 370 basis point gross margin improvement over two years suggests the 'Foundations for Growth' initiative is yielding tangible results, likely through manufacturing automation and supply chain optimization. Operating margin expansion to 14.5% in 2026Q2, from 12.2% in 2025Q2, indicates operating leverage is emerging as revenue growth outpaces fixed cost growth. However, the sub-50% gross margin remains below the 60%+ typical of proprietary implant peers, underscoring the high-volume disposable nature of the business. Investors should monitor whether margin gains are sustainable or partly driven by one-time benefits from the recent divestiture.
ROIC Trapped Below 3%
ROIC has remained below 3% for ten consecutive quarters, with 2026Q2 at 2.3%, according to reported figures. This suggests the company is not yet compounding returns on invested capital at a rate that justifies its premium valuation.
Despite improving margins, ROIC has been stagnant, ranging from 1.6% to 2.3% over the past two years. This implies that margin gains are being offset by an expanding capital base, likely due to the tuck-in acquisition strategy that has increased goodwill and intangibles. The low ROIC relative to peers like Integer Holdings (5.4%) suggests MMSI's acquisition-driven growth has not yet translated into superior capital efficiency. If the company can integrate recent acquisitions and drive organic growth without proportional capital increases, ROIC could improve, but current trends warrant caution.
Working Capital Drag Intensifies
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 183 days in 2026Q2 from 180 days a year earlier, driven by DIO rising to 162 days, as per financial statements. This indicates increasing inventory absorption that may strain cash flow.
Inventory days on hand have climbed from 155 days in 2024Q2 to 162 days in 2026Q2, while DSO and DPO have remained relatively stable. This suggests the company is building inventory, possibly to mitigate supply chain risks or in anticipation of demand, but it also ties up cash. The CCC of 183 days is notably high, reflecting the complexity of managing thousands of SKUs and custom procedural trays. If inventory growth outpaces sales, it could signal obsolescence risk, especially given the fast-changing clinical guidelines. Investors should monitor whether this is a deliberate strategic choice or a sign of operational inefficiency.
Leverage Declines Despite Debt
Debt-to-equity fell to 0.49 in 2026Q2 from 0.70 in 2024Q1, while D/EBITDA improved to 8.68 from 13.93, based on reported figures. Interest coverage remains comfortable at 5.23.
The balance sheet has strengthened significantly, with equity expanding 42% over two years, outpacing debt growth. D/EBITDA has improved from 13.93 in 2024Q1 to 8.68 in 2026Q2, indicating that EBITDA growth is reducing leverage even as debt remains near $820M. Interest coverage of 5.23 in 2026Q2, though lower than the 9.21 in 2026Q1, remains adequate. The fortress-like balance sheet provides ample optionality for future acquisitions or share repurchases, but the elevated D/EBITDA relative to peers like Integer (0.80 D/E) suggests MMSI is more leveraged, though still manageable.
Liquidity Buffer Remains Robust
Current ratio improved to 4.20 in 2026Q2 from 4.09 a year earlier, with quick ratio at 2.79, according to recent filings. Cash reserves of $448.7M provide a strong cushion against operational shocks.
The current ratio has consistently remained above 4.0 over the past two years, indicating a substantial liquidity buffer. The quick ratio of 2.79 suggests that even without selling inventory, the company can cover short-term obligations nearly three times over. This liquidity position is particularly reassuring given the inventory-heavy business model and the potential for supply chain disruptions. However, the high current ratio may also indicate inefficient use of cash, as excess liquidity could be deployed for higher-return investments. Nonetheless, in a rising rate environment, this fortress-like liquidity provides significant financial flexibility.
P/E Misleads on Earnings Power
The trailing P/E of 40.15 appears expensive, but forward P/E of 20.33 suggests the market expects significant earnings growth, as per current valuation data. This gap highlights the risk of misapplying trailing multiples to a company undergoing portfolio transformation.
The wide divergence between trailing and forward P/E reflects the market's anticipation of margin expansion and organic growth acceleration, partly driven by the divestiture of a lower-margin business. However, using trailing P/E alone would overstate the valuation, while forward P/E may understate risks if the divestiture's benefits fail to materialize. A more appropriate metric for MMSI is EV/EBITDA, which at 17.40 is more comparable to peers like Integer (16.90) and accounts for the company's debt and cash. Investors should focus on EV/EBITDA and forward earnings power rather than trailing P/E, which is distorted by one-time items and the divestiture.