Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) P/E Ratio History
Insufficient DataInsufficient historical P/E data to classify valuation. · Data 2026–2026
Loading P/E history...
P/E Ratio Analysis
As of June 16, 2026, Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of -0.4x, with a stock price of $4.52 and trailing twelve-month earnings per share of $-18.22.
Compared to the Healthcare sector median P/E of 22.6x, NAKA trades at a 102% discount to its sector peers. The sector includes 233 companies with P/E ratios ranging from 0.0x to 174.4x.
Relative to the broader market, NAKA trades at a notable discount to the S&P 500 median P/E of 25.0x. Investors should consider the company's growth prospects, competitive position, and earnings quality when evaluating whether the current valuation is justified.
For a comprehensive intrinsic value estimate using discounted cash flow analysis, see our NAKA DCF Valuation Calculator →
Note: P/E ratio is just one valuation metric. It does not account for balance sheet strength, cash flow quality, or growth sustainability. Always conduct comprehensive due diligence before making investment decisions.
NAKA Cross-Benchmark Valuation
How does the current P/E compare to sector peers and the broader market?
NAKA P/E vs Peers
Digital Health and Care Delivery peers sorted by market cap
| Company | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | PEG Ratio | EPS Growth (1Y) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $100M | 19.7Lowest | - | +125%Best | |
| $871M | 130.0 | - | - | |
| $4B | 21.1 | 0.40Best | -12% | |
| $7B | 59.2 | - | -4% | |
| $149B | 153.1 | - | -11% | |
| $946M | 32.0 | - | +104% | |
| $128B | 72.4 | - | -62% | |
| $373B | 31.1 | - | -15% |
Lower P/E can signal a discount or weaker growth expectations; PEG adds growth context.
What if you invested $1,000 in NAKA back in 2026?
Total return with dividends reinvested · 0+ years of data
Calculate ReturnsHow much would $100/month in NAKA be worth today?
Dollar cost averaging vs lump sum · see how regular investing compounds over time
Run the NumbersIs NAKA Undervalued Right Now?
DCF intrinsic value, peer multiples, and analyst estimates — see what the stock is really worth.
View ValuationNAKA vs LLY — which is the better buy?
Side-by-side revenue, margins, P/E and 10-year returns vs Eli Lilly and Company.
Compare NowNAKA — Frequently Asked Questions
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying NAKA stock.
What is NAKA's P/E ratio?
Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) trailing twelve-month P/E ratio is -0.4x, based on TTM diluted EPS of $-18.22. The 5-year average P/E is N/A and the historical range spans N/A to N/A.
Is NAKA stock overvalued or undervalued?
NAKA current P/E: -0.4x. 5-year average P/E: N/A. Percentile: N/A.
Is NAKA stock expensive?
NAKA is fairly valued relative to its own history. The current P/E of -0.4x is near the 5-year average of N/A (N/A percentile of historical range).
What is NAKA's historical P/E range?
Over the past 5 years, NAKA's P/E ratio has ranged from N/A to N/A, with a median of N/A and an average of N/A. The current P/E of -0.4x places the stock at the N/A percentile of this range. Full historical data spans 2026–2026.
How does NAKA's P/E compare to the S&P 500?
NAKA trades at -0.4x P/E versus the S&P 500 median of 25.0x. The 102% discount to the market suggests lower growth expectations or perceived higher risk.
How does NAKA's valuation compare to Healthcare peers?
Nakamoto Inc. P/E of -0.4x compares to the Healthcare sector median of 22.6x. The discount suggests lower growth expectations, weaker margins, or higher perceived risk relative to peers. See the peer comparison table on this page for ticker-by-ticker P/E and PEG.
What is NAKA's PEG ratio?
NAKA PEG ratio is N/A, based on a P/E of -0.4x and EPS growth of -1452.2%. PEG normalises P/E by growth and helps compare stocks with different earnings trajectories.
What is NAKA's earnings yield?
NAKA earnings yield is N/A, the inverse of its -0.4x P/E ratio. Earnings yield represents the percentage of each dollar invested that the company earns. It can be compared directly to bond yields to assess relative attractiveness of stocks versus fixed income.