Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 23.2x · EV/EBITDA 10.3x · ROE 7.8%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $24.0B | $26.1B | $23.6B | $21.4B | $14.3B | $32.4B | $48.0B | $43.1B | $31.8B | $34.5B | $27.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $30.0B | $31.4B | $28.7B | $26.8B | $20.4B | $36.2B | $51.7B | $46.9B | $34.9B | $37.3B | $30.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 23.19 | 29.12 | — | — | — | 53.30 | 40.76 | 36.89 | 29.22 | 20.91 | 18.99 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.18 | 1.46 | 1.31 | 1.18 | 0.80 | 1.89 | 2.77 | 2.51 | 1.75 | 1.94 | 1.12 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.89 | 2.37 | 1.96 | 1.77 | 1.07 | 2.24 | 4.03 | 3.41 | 2.62 | 2.87 | 2.03 |
| P/FCF | 23.60 | 29.19 | 17.45 | 11.05 | — | 22.24 | 22.28 | 25.43 | 33.91 | 34.17 | 26.52 |
| P/OCF | 18.14 | 22.43 | 13.92 | 9.27 | — | 16.82 | 18.19 | 18.94 | 17.85 | 18.47 | 14.42 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.76 | 1.59 | 1.48 | 1.15 | 2.11 | 2.99 | 2.74 | 1.93 | 2.10 | 1.25 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.35 | 12.30 | 14.98 | 23.41 | 280.10 | 19.27 | 22.19 | 20.66 | 12.43 | 14.68 | 9.76 |
| EV / EBIT | 18.52 | 20.71 | 62.44 | — | — | 53.73 | 30.69 | 27.27 | 20.46 | 23.02 | 22.31 |
| EV / FCF | — | 35.11 | 21.21 | 13.85 | — | 24.81 | 24.00 | 27.69 | 37.25 | 36.91 | 29.68 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 45.2% | 45.2% | 43.1% | 41.0% | 40.4% | 41.8% | 45.7% | 46.4% | 47.2% | 46.0% | 43.3% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 8.0% | 2.9% | -0.6% | -8.6% | 3.2% | 7.3% | 8.0% | 9.5% | 8.5% | 7.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 5.0% | 5.0% | -3.9% | -2.6% | -9.0% | 19.3% | 6.9% | 6.8% | 6.0% | 9.3% | 5.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.8% | 7.8% | -5.8% | -3.7% | -11.6% | 25.2% | 9.7% | 9.4% | 9.0% | 13.0% | 11.5% |
| ROA | 3.2% | 3.2% | -2.4% | -1.6% | -5.2% | 11.3% | 4.3% | 4.4% | 4.2% | 5.8% | 4.6% |
| ROIC | 6.4% | 6.4% | 2.3% | -0.5% | -6.1% | 2.5% | 5.9% | 6.5% | 8.6% | 7.2% | 8.7% |
| ROCE | 7.1% | 7.1% | 2.5% | -0.5% | -6.6% | 2.5% | 6.3% | 7.2% | 9.4% | 7.5% | 8.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.42 | 0.58 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.39 | 0.42 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.17 | 3.17 | 3.91 | 6.36 | 100.58 | 3.22 | 2.97 | 2.32 | 1.72 | 1.86 | 1.78 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.48 | 0.42 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.08 | 2.08 | 2.65 | 4.73 | 84.52 | 2.00 | 1.59 | 1.69 | 1.12 | 1.09 | 1.04 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.92 | 3.76 | 2.80 | — | 2.57 | 1.72 | 2.26 | 3.34 | 2.75 | 3.16 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.56 | 4.56 | 1.36 | -0.72 | -6.09 | 4.10 | 8.69 | 8.22 | 6.46 | 6.16 | 2.42 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.23 | 1.20 | 1.29 | 1.39 | 1.45 | 1.36 | 1.21 | 1.47 | 1.34 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.84 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.93 | 1.06 | 0.96 | 0.87 | 1.13 | 1.02 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.30 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.31 | 0.42 | 0.20 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.23 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.76 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.41 | 3.41 | 3.20 | 3.07 | 2.63 | 2.90 | 3.14 | 3.32 | 3.58 | 4.08 | 4.10 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 72.25 | 74.37 | 85.40 | 95.27 | 91.23 | 87.64 | 106.84 | 84.24 | 86.30 | 83.81 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.6% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.0% | 1.8% | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 1.2% |
| Payout Ratio | 36.6% | 36.6% | — | — | — | 17.2% | 0.1% | 43.4% | 36.8% | 23.2% | 22.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.3% | 3.4% | — | — | — | 1.9% | 2.5% | 2.7% | 3.4% | 4.8% | 5.3% |
| FCF Yield | 4.2% | 3.4% | 5.7% | 9.1% | — | 4.5% | 4.5% | 3.9% | 2.9% | 2.9% | 3.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 1.4% | 6.0% | 0.7% | 3.6% | 3.3% | 1.9% | 2.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.6% | 1.3% | 1.9% | 3.4% | 4.4% | 7.7% | 0.7% | 4.8% | 4.5% | 3.0% | 3.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $963M | $933M | $949M | $952M | $950M | $958M | $973M | $997M | $1.0B | $990M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PHG stock.
Koninklijke Philips N.V.'s current P/E ratio is 23.2x. The historical average is 30.9x. This places it at the 45th percentile of its historical range.
Koninklijke Philips N.V.'s current EV/EBITDA is 10.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.9x.
Koninklijke Philips N.V.'s return on equity (ROE) is 7.8%. The historical average is 9.5%.
Based on historical data, Koninklijke Philips N.V. is trading at a P/E of 23.2x. This is at the 45th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Koninklijke Philips N.V.'s current dividend yield is 1.58% with a payout ratio of 36.6%.
Koninklijke Philips N.V. has 45.2% gross margin and 8.0% operating margin.
Koninklijke Philips N.V.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.2x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Litigation and regulatory overhang
Margin Recovery Masks Underlying Strain
Gross margin rebounded to 49.3% in 2026Q2 from a 38.9% trough, but operating margin averaged only 8.4% over four quarters, indicating persistent cost pressures. According to the income statement, the recovery appears cost-driven rather than pricing-led.
The gross margin improvement suggests some pricing power or mix shift, yet the operating margin remains far below the 20%+ levels of top med-tech peers, implying high fixed costs and ongoing remediation expenses. Net margin swung from -24.1% in 2024Q1 to 8.8% in 2026Q2, but this volatility reflects litigation provisions and one-time items, not sustainable earning power. Investors should monitor whether operating leverage can persist without top-line growth, as the flat revenue base limits the scalability of recent margin gains.
Capital Returns Trapped by Legal Overhang
ROIC improved to 2.7% in 2026Q2 from -3.9% in 2024Q1, but remains below the cost of capital and far behind peers like Stryker at 11.1%. Based on reported figures, returns are recovering from a depressed base.
The recovery in ROIC is encouraging but still insufficient to create value, as the company's weighted average cost of capital is likely above 7%. The gap between ROIC and peer levels suggests that the litigation and restructuring costs are consuming capital that could otherwise be deployed for growth. With goodwill representing 36% of total assets, there is a risk that future impairments could further erode returns, making the current improvement fragile.
Working Capital Drag Persists
Cash conversion cycle remains elevated at 119 days in 2026Q2, driven by high DIO of 130 days and DSO of 72 days. As reported in the balance sheet, inventory and receivables are absorbing cash, limiting operational flexibility.
The CCC has improved from 145 days in 2024Q2 but remains well above the 60-80 day range typical for efficient med-tech firms. High inventory days suggest either slow-moving product lines or supply chain disruptions, while DSO indicates slower collections from hospital customers. The company's ability to extend DPO to 84 days provides some offset, but the net working capital drag is a key reason why free cash flow remains volatile and below net income.
Debt Burden Easing but Coverage Thin
Debt-to-EBITDA fell to 7.53x in 2026Q2 from 17.60x in 2025Q1, but interest coverage of 6.75x remains modest. According to recent filings, leverage is moderating, yet absolute debt of $7.5B still weighs on the balance sheet.
The improvement in D/EBITDA is largely due to EBITDA recovery rather than aggressive deleveraging, as total debt only declined by $0.9B over the past year. Interest coverage of 6.75x is adequate but leaves little room for a downturn, especially if litigation settlements require additional cash. The company's debt maturity profile and refinancing needs warrant monitoring, given the potential for higher interest rates to increase the cost of carry.
Liquidity Buffer Adequate but Thin
Current ratio improved to 1.26 in 2026Q2, but quick ratio of 0.82 indicates reliance on inventory. Cash of $1.8B covers only 24% of total debt, suggesting a modest cushion. Based on the balance sheet, liquidity is adequate for near-term obligations.
The quick ratio below 1.0 implies that Philips would struggle to meet short-term liabilities without selling inventory, which is a concern in a stressed scenario. The cash position is small relative to debt, and with litigation payments potentially ongoing, the liquidity buffer could be quickly depleted. However, the company has access to credit lines and a stable service revenue stream, which may provide additional flexibility.
P/E Misleads on Turnaround Potential
The trailing P/E of 24.53 appears reasonable, but forward P/E of 16.38 implies a sharp earnings recovery that may not materialize. As reported in the valuation multiples, the market is pricing in a return to normalized profitability.
The P/E ratio is distorted by the volatile earnings base, which includes large litigation charges and one-time gains. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 10.82x is below the peer median of ~15x, reflecting the market's skepticism about the quality of EBITDA. Investors should focus on EV/EBITDA and free cash flow yield, as they better capture the company's cash-generating ability and the impact of legal overhang. The forward P/E of 16.38 may be overly optimistic if revenue growth remains flat and litigation costs persist.