Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 42.4x · EV/EBITDA 24.0x · ROE 5.7%. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $21.2B | $32.8B | $17.0B | $9.4B | $4.2B | $8.3B | $1.4B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $18.2B | $29.8B | $17.6B | $11.7B | $8.4B | $12.0B | $5.6B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 42.44 | 67.13 | 39.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 5.88 | 9.07 | 6.49 | 4.46 | 2.64 | 8.46 | 2.56 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.98 | 3.12 | 2.60 | 1.69 | 0.75 | 1.77 | 0.47 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 8.24 | 6.75 | 5.54 | 5.32 | 12.21 | 9.95 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 23.99 | 39.18 | 40.35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 34.68 | 56.62 | 75.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 75.1% | 75.1% | 69.7% | 70.9% | 86.2% | 89.9% | 75.3% | 61.4% | 44.9% |
| Operating Margin | 11.0% | 11.0% | 6.3% | -10.4% | -18.1% | -44.2% | -43.7% | -33.2% | -42.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.1% | 10.1% | 13.5% | -10.4% | -18.2% | -44.5% | -29.8% | -33.2% | -42.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 5.7% | 5.7% | 8.3% | -5.4% | -6.3% | -12.5% | -8.7% | -12.2% | -13.9% |
| ROA | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.5% | -1.2% | -2.3% | -5.5% | -2.8% | -3.0% | -3.0% |
| ROIC | 3.6% | 3.6% | 1.7% | -2.0% | -2.4% | -4.2% | -3.2% | -2.3% | -2.2% |
| ROCE | 4.9% | 4.9% | 2.3% | -2.8% | -3.3% | -6.2% | -4.7% | -3.1% | -3.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.49 | 0.97 | 1.02 | 0.89 | 1.66 | 2.42 | 3.65 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.55 | 2.55 | 7.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.29 | 0.10 | 0.41 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 1.37 | 2.18 | 3.35 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -3.94 | -3.94 | 1.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6.05 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.21 | -0.38 | -1.68 | -4.68 | -1.77 | -0.86 | -0.77 |
Net cash position: cash ($4.9B) exceeds total debt ($1.9B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 1.11 | 0.64 | 1.41 | 44.32 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 1.11 | 0.64 | 1.41 | 44.32 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 1.36 | 73.21 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.07 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | 0.1% | 0.4% | 1.0% | 0.5% | 2.8% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.4% | 1.5% | 2.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.4% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 1.0% | 3.9% | 2.8% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.3B | $1.1B | $945M | $901M | $527M | $116M | $116M | $116M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SOFI stock.
SoFi Technologies, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 42.4x. The historical average is 53.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
SoFi Technologies, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 24.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 39.8x.
SoFi Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 5.7%. The historical average is -5.6%.
Based on historical data, SoFi Technologies, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 42.4x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
SoFi Technologies, Inc. has 75.1% gross margin and 11.0% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
SoFi Technologies, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Fair value accounting masks credit risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Priced for Tech-Like Growth
SoFi trades at 2.26x book value and 48.5x trailing earnings, per recent market data, implying the market prices it as a high-growth fintech rather than a traditional bank, with expectations of sustained above-peer returns.
The P/B of 2.26x is well above the peer average of roughly 1.5x for digital banks like LendingClub, suggesting investors are paying for future profitability improvements. The forward P/E of 30x indicates the market expects significant earnings growth, likely from continued NII expansion and fee income diversification. However, the current ROE of 1.4% is far below what would justify such a premium, implying either a rapid reversion to higher returns or a potential de-rating if growth stalls.
ROE Depressed by Thin Leverage
SoFi's ROE of 1.4% in Q2 2026, as reported in its financial statements, is constrained by a 0.18 equity-to-assets ratio, which limits the impact of a 1.3% NIM and 27.4% fee income on shareholder returns.
The DuPont decomposition reveals that while NIM is stable at 1.3% and fee income contributes over a quarter of revenue, the bank's leverage is extremely low compared to traditional banks, which typically operate with equity-to-assets ratios above 8%. This low leverage, combined with a 63.7% efficiency ratio, results in a sub-2% ROE, far below the cost of equity. The recent improvement in efficiency from 66.4% to 63.7% over the past year suggests operating leverage is building, but the capital structure remains the primary drag on profitability.
NIM Stable, Efficiency Improving
SoFi's NIM held at 1.3% for the eighth consecutive quarter, per its quarterly data, while the efficiency ratio improved to 63.7% in Q2 2026 from 66.4% a year earlier, indicating cost discipline amid growth.
The stability of NIM at 1.3% suggests that asset yields and funding costs are moving in tandem, likely due to the increasing use of low-cost deposits. The efficiency ratio improvement reflects scale benefits from a 35% YoY member growth and cross-selling, which spreads fixed costs over a larger revenue base. However, the efficiency ratio remains above the 50-60% range typical of efficient banks, indicating room for further improvement if revenue growth continues to outpace expense growth.
Thin Capital Buffer Limits Flexibility
SoFi's equity-to-assets ratio of 0.18 in Q2 2026, as per its balance sheet, is far below the 8-10% typical for banks, suggesting limited capacity for loan growth or capital return without raising additional equity.
The reported equity-to-assets ratio of 0.18 is misleading because it likely excludes certain off-balance-sheet items, but even so, it indicates a thin capital base relative to the risk profile of a consumer lender. This low capital ratio may constrain the bank's ability to absorb credit losses or expand its balance sheet aggressively, as seen in the $3.9B negative operating cash flow in Q2 2026. Investors should monitor whether management will need to issue equity to support growth, which could dilute existing shareholders.
Credit Costs Appear Contained
SoFi's provision for credit losses was just $13.8M in Q2 2026, up from $10.0M a year ago, according to its income statement, despite a growing loan portfolio, suggesting credit quality remains stable for now.
The low provision relative to the loan book may indicate that SoFi's high-FICO borrower base is performing well, but it also raises questions about the adequacy of reserves given the use of fair value accounting. The fair value approach can mask credit deterioration by adjusting loan values based on model assumptions rather than recognizing losses through provisions. As the loan portfolio grows, investors should watch for any divergence between provision expense and actual charge-offs, which could signal emerging credit stress.
P/E Misleads Due to Fair Value Swings
SoFi's P/E of 48.5x, based on trailing earnings, is distorted by fair value accounting for loans, which can create non-cash gains or losses, obscuring the underlying profitability of the lending business.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for SoFi is P/E, because its earnings are subject to significant volatility from fair value adjustments on loans held at fair value. A small change in discount rates or prepayment assumptions can swing quarterly income, making trailing P/E unreliable. Instead, investors should focus on P/TBV and ROTCE, which better capture the bank's tangible capital generation. Additionally, adjusting for fair value gains by normalizing credit costs would provide a clearer picture of sustainable earnings power.