Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 9.9x · EV/EBITDA 8.8x · ROE 13.2%. (2009–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.3B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $795M | $775M | $904M | $834M | $1.0B | $937M | $1.1B | $1.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $1.9B | $1.7B | $1.7B | $1.5B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.7B | $921M | $1.3B | $2.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 9.91 | 8.48 | 10.69 | — | 84.78 | — | 11.34 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.86 | 0.72 | 0.83 | 1.34 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.21 | 1.04 | 1.14 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 1.08 | 0.93 | 2.39 | 2.01 | 2.53 | 3.77 |
| P/FCF | 22.57 | 19.54 | — | — | — | 9.74 | 10.17 | 48.50 | — | 342.17 | 92.42 |
| P/OCF | 6.40 | 5.54 | 5.71 | 24.83 | — | 7.30 | 8.61 | 36.96 | — | 56.63 | 30.50 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.15 | 1.22 | 1.12 | 1.14 | 1.15 | 1.22 | 1.42 | 0.70 | 0.97 | 1.49 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.81 | 8.02 | 8.58 | 11.07 | 14.28 | 15.39 | — | 61.81 | — | — | 107.67 |
| EV / EBIT | 13.12 | 8.98 | 11.73 | 20.60 | 28.99 | 36.68 | 20.34 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 30.57 | — | — | — | 14.67 | 17.01 | 80.44 | — | 399.69 | 103.06 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 21.3% | 21.3% | 28.1% | 25.5% | 23.3% | 16.2% | 25.3% | 21.0% | 17.4% | 18.6% | 17.5% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 9.7% | 9.4% | 4.7% | 2.2% | 0.1% | -9.0% | -7.3% | -16.6% | -10.8% | -6.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 8.7% | 8.7% | 6.7% | -0.5% | 0.8% | -1.3% | -4.9% | -58.6% | -25.8% | -14.2% | -12.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 13.2% | 13.2% | 11.1% | -0.8% | 1.1% | -1.8% | -8.5% | -156.2% | -73.5% | -42.2% | -35.7% |
| ROA | 5.8% | 5.8% | 4.7% | -0.4% | 0.5% | -0.8% | -2.8% | -30.3% | -19.6% | -22.3% | -17.3% |
| ROIC | 6.6% | 6.6% | 6.5% | 3.2% | 1.5% | 0.1% | -6.0% | -8.5% | -29.9% | -16.8% | -9.6% |
| ROCE | 7.7% | 7.7% | 7.7% | 3.9% | 1.7% | 0.1% | -6.2% | -4.1% | -12.8% | -17.5% | -9.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.86 | 0.86 | 1.07 | 1.02 | 0.96 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 2.03 | 0.35 | 0.46 | 0.49 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.26 | 4.26 | 4.76 | 6.38 | 7.89 | 8.15 | — | 31.74 | — | — | 12.57 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.58 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 1.57 | -0.03 | 0.43 | 0.43 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.89 | 2.89 | 3.53 | 5.01 | 6.17 | 5.17 | — | 24.54 | — | — | 11.11 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 11.03 | — | — | — | 4.93 | 6.84 | 31.94 | — | 57.52 | 10.64 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.79 | 4.79 | 3.91 | 1.70 | 1.15 | 0.89 | 1.34 | — | -0.71 | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.90 | 1.90 | 1.90 | 1.82 | 1.73 | 2.02 | 1.92 | 1.76 | 19.63 | 2.54 | 3.76 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.54 | 1.54 | 1.55 | 1.50 | 1.44 | 1.73 | 1.62 | 1.48 | 15.42 | 1.89 | 2.77 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 0.66 | 6.18 | 0.42 | 1.05 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.49 | 1.73 | 1.40 |
| Inventory Turnover | 8.83 | 8.83 | 8.88 | 9.68 | 11.23 | 12.16 | 9.23 | 11.41 | 8.90 | 52.93 | 43.33 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 53.16 | 54.56 | 66.00 | 65.54 | 62.75 | 69.10 | 55.39 | 11.90 | 11.54 | 10.56 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.2% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 10.1% | 11.8% | 9.4% | — | 1.2% | — | 8.8% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 4.4% | 5.1% | — | — | — | 10.3% | 9.8% | 2.1% | — | 0.3% | 1.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.2% | 1.4% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 1.5% | 4.6% | 1.8% | 0.8% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.2% | 1.4% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 1.5% | 4.6% | 1.8% | 0.8% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $30M | $30M | $28M | $29M | $29M | $32M | $33M | $36M | $35M | $35M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 17 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying VTOL stock.
Bristow Group Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 9.9x. The historical average is 49.3x. This places it at the 17th percentile of its historical range.
Bristow Group Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 8.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 18.1x.
Bristow Group Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 13.2%. The historical average is -15.1%.
Based on historical data, Bristow Group Inc. is trading at a P/E of 9.9x. This is at the 17th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Bristow Group Inc. has 21.3% gross margin and 9.7% operating margin.
Bristow Group Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
CapEx intensity and working capital swings
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Stability
Gross margin swung from 94.8% in 2026Q1 to 26.4% in 2026Q2, per quarterly filings, yet operating margin held near 9.6%, suggesting one-time items distort the gross margin trend.
The extreme gross margin spike in 2026Q1 appears to be a data anomaly or one-time gain, as the prior and subsequent quarters cluster in the 20-31% range. Operating margin has remained relatively stable between 6.8% and 13.1% over the last ten quarters, indicating that core operations are not experiencing the same volatility. Net margin, however, is more erratic, with 2025Q3's 13.3% boosted by a non-operating gain, so investors should focus on operating margin as the cleaner measure of earning power.
Returns Trapped by Asset-Heavy Model
ROIC has hovered between 1.1% and 2.2% over the past ten quarters, as reported in financial statements, reflecting a capital-intensive fleet that generates thin returns relative to its asset base.
Despite steady revenue growth and improving margins, ROIC remains in the low single digits, indicating that the company is not compounding returns on invested capital. The asset turnover ratio is consistently around 0.17, meaning each dollar of assets generates only $0.17 of revenue, a structural characteristic of the offshore helicopter industry. ROE has improved from 0.8% in 2024Q1 to 2.0% in 2026Q2, but this is still modest, and the gap between ROIC and cost of capital suggests value creation is limited.
Working Capital Efficiency Strained by Inventory Swings
Cash conversion cycle extended to 73 days in 2026Q2 from 68 days a year earlier, per quarterly data, driven by a spike in days inventory outstanding to 41 days, indicating potential inventory buildup.
DSO has improved from 63 days in 2024Q1 to 56 days in 2026Q2, showing better receivables collection, but DIO jumped to 41 days in 2026Q2 from 37 days in 2024Q1, and DPO fell to 24 days from 32 days, pressuring cash flow. The 2026Q1 data shows extreme DIO of 593 days and DPO of 372 days, which appears to be a data anomaly, but the underlying trend suggests working capital is absorbing cash. Asset turnover remains flat at 0.17, indicating no improvement in overall asset efficiency.
Leverage Elevated but Coverage Improving
Debt-to-EBITDA stood at 14.16x in 2026Q2, down from 18.96x in 2024Q1, as per balance sheet data, while interest coverage improved to 3.73x from 2.09x, indicating gradual deleveraging.
Although D/E has improved from 1.01 to 0.89 over the period, the absolute debt level remains near $1.0B, and D/EBITDA is still high, reflecting the cyclicality of EBITDA. Interest coverage has strengthened from 2.09x in 2024Q1 to 3.73x in 2026Q2, suggesting debt service is becoming more comfortable, but the 2026Q1 coverage of 2.20x shows vulnerability to quarterly earnings swings. The company appears to be managing leverage, but the high D/EBITDA warrants monitoring, especially if EBITDA contracts.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens but Cash Flow Remains Volatile
Current ratio improved to 2.26 in 2026Q2 from 1.73 in 2024Q1, per balance sheet data, with quick ratio at 1.85, indicating a solid short-term liquidity position despite negative free cash flow.
The liquidity position has strengthened consistently, with cash rising to $314.8M, providing a cushion against operational volatility. However, free cash flow was negative in 2026Q2 at -18.4% margin, and cumulative FCF over the last ten quarters is -$107.4M, suggesting that the liquidity buffer is being funded by debt and equity rather than operations. Under a severe stress scenario, the current ratio would likely deteriorate, but the current level appears adequate for near-term obligations.
Misapplied Metric: P/E on Cyclical Earnings
The P/E ratio of 10.63, based on TTM earnings, is commonly used for Bristow, but cyclicality and one-time items make it misleading; EV/EBITDA of 9.25 is more appropriate.
Bristow's earnings are highly cyclical and subject to one-time gains and tax items, as seen in 2025Q3's net income spike, which inflates the P/E denominator. The P/E of 10.63 may appear cheap, but it does not account for the capital intensity and asset-heavy nature of the business. EV/EBITDA of 9.25 is a better valuation metric because it normalizes for capital structure and non-operating items, but even this should be adjusted for the high maintenance CapEx required to sustain the fleet.