Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ACCS vs BWXT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ACCS
ACCESS Newswire Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$32M
5Y Perf.-5.8%
BWXT
BWX Technologies, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$19.22B
5Y Perf.+88.3%

ACCS vs BWXT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ACCS logoACCS
BWXT logoBWXT
IndustryAdvertising AgenciesAerospace & Defense
Market Cap$32M$19.22B
Revenue (TTM)$23M$3.38B
Net Income (TTM)$4M$345M
Gross Margin76.5%16.8%
Operating Margin-6.9%11.0%
Forward P/E7.6x45.5x
Total Debt$1M$2.02B
Cash & Equiv.$3M$503M

ACCS vs BWXTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ACCS
BWXT
StockDec 24May 26Return
ACCESS Newswire Inc. (ACCS)10094.2-5.8%
BWX Technologies, I… (BWXT)100188.3+88.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ACCS vs BWXT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACCS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. BWX Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ACCS
ACCESS Newswire Inc.
The Defensive Pick

ACCS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.

  • Lower volatility, beta -0.30, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 0.88x
  • PEG 0.52 vs BWXT's 10.61
  • Lower P/E (7.6x vs 45.5x), PEG 0.52 vs 10.61
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
BWXT
BWX Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick

BWXT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.60, yield 0.5%
  • Rev growth 18.3%, EPS growth 16.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.7%
  • 5.5% 10Y total return vs ACCS's 2.1%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBWXT logoBWXT18.3% revenue growth vs ACCS's -1.9%
ValueACCS logoACCSLower P/E (7.6x vs 45.5x), PEG 0.52 vs 10.61
Quality / MarginsACCS logoACCS19.0% margin vs BWXT's 10.2%
Stability / SafetyACCS logoACCSLower D/E ratio (3.9% vs 163.4%)
DividendsBWXT logoBWXT0.5% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BWXT logoBWXT+95.6% vs ACCS's -7.2%
Efficiency (ROA)ACCS logoACCS9.6% ROA vs BWXT's 8.6%, ROIC -3.5% vs 10.1%

ACCS vs BWXT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ACCSACCESS Newswire Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

BWXTBWX Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Government Operations Segment
73.4%$2.4B
Commercial Operations Segment
26.6%$853M

ACCS vs BWXT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLACCSLAGGINGBWXT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ACCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

BWXT is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 149.3x ACCS's $23M. ACCS is the more profitable business, keeping 19.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BWXT's 10.2%. On growth, ACCS holds the edge at +3.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricACCS logoACCSACCESS Newswire I…BWXT logoBWXTBWX Technologies,…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$23M$3.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1M$458M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4M$345M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$407,000$328M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+76.5%+16.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-6.9%+11.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+19.0%+10.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.8%+9.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.0%+26.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+94.0%+20.7%
ACCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ACCS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 7.6x trailing earnings, ACCS trades at a 87% valuation discount to BWXT's 58.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ACCS offers better value at 0.52x vs BWXT's 13.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricACCS logoACCSACCESS Newswire I…BWXT logoBWXTBWX Technologies,…
Market CapShares × price$32M$19.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$31M$20.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS7.59x58.43x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.45.51x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.52x13.62x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple27.09x47.94x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.43x6.01x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.07x15.62x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF60.26x65.08x
ACCS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ACCS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

BWXT delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $14 for ACCS. ACCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BWXT's 1.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACCS scores 7/9 vs BWXT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricACCS logoACCSACCESS Newswire I…BWXT logoBWXTBWX Technologies,…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.0%+27.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+9.6%+8.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-3.5%+10.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-4.2%+10.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x1.63x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$2M$1.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$503M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$2.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.42x10.88x
ACCS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BWXT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BWXT five years ago would be worth $32,491 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,689 for ACCS. Over the past 12 months, BWXT leads with a +95.6% total return vs ACCS's -7.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BWXT at 48.4% vs ACCS's -1.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricACCS logoACCSACCESS Newswire I…BWXT logoBWXTBWX Technologies,…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-14.2%+15.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-7.2%+95.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-3.1%+226.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-3.1%+224.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+2.1%+551.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-1.0%+48.4%
BWXT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ACCS and BWXT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ACCS is the less volatile stock with a -0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BWXT's 1.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWXT currently trades 86.8% from its 52-week high vs ACCS's 63.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricACCS logoACCSACCESS Newswire I…BWXT logoBWXTBWX Technologies,…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.30x1.60x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$13.35$241.82
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.51$105.07
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+63.1%+86.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.048.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded13K1.0M
Evenly matched — ACCS and BWXT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

BWXT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

BWXT is the only dividend payer here at 0.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricACCS logoACCSACCESS Newswire I…BWXT logoBWXTBWX Technologies,…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$210.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts16
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises010
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.2%
BWXT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

ACCS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BWXT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallACCESS Newswire Inc. (ACCS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ACCS vs BWXT: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ACCS or BWXT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, BWX Technologies, Inc.

(BWXT) is the stronger pick with 18. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for ACCESS Newswire Inc. (ACCS). ACCESS Newswire Inc. (ACCS) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ACCS or BWXT?

On trailing P/E, ACCESS Newswire Inc.

(ACCS) is the cheapest at 7. 6x versus BWX Technologies, Inc. at 58. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ACCS or BWXT?

Over the past 5 years, BWX Technologies, Inc.

(BWXT) delivered a total return of +224. 9%, compared to -3. 1% for ACCESS Newswire Inc. (ACCS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BWXT returned +551. 5% versus ACCS's +2. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ACCS or BWXT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ACCESS Newswire Inc.

(ACCS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 30β versus BWX Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 60β — meaning BWXT is approximately -641% more volatile than ACCS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ACCESS Newswire Inc. (ACCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 163% for BWX Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ACCS or BWXT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), BWX Technologies, Inc.

(BWXT) is pulling ahead at 18. 3% versus -1. 9% for ACCESS Newswire Inc. (ACCS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACCESS Newswire Inc. grew EPS 139. 4% year-over-year, compared to 16. 9% for BWX Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BWXT leads at 12. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ACCS or BWXT?

ACCESS Newswire Inc.

(ACCS) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus 10. 3% for BWX Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BWXT leads at 10. 1% versus -6. 9% for ACCS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACCS leads at 76. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — ACCS or BWXT?

In this comparison, BWXT (0.

5% yield) pays a dividend. ACCS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is ACCS or BWXT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, ACCESS Newswire Inc.

(ACCS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 30)). BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) carries a higher beta of 1. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACCS: +2. 1%, BWXT: +551. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between ACCS and BWXT?

These companies operate in different sectors (ACCS (Communication Services) and BWXT (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ACCS is a small-cap deep-value stock; BWXT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

ACCS

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 149%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BWXT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ACCS and BWXT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ACCS: 298.6% · BWXT: 26.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(ACCS: 19.0% · BWXT: 10.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ACCS: 7.6x · BWXT: 58.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.