Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ACCS vs BWXT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
ACCS vs BWXT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $32M | $19.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23M | $3.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $345M |
| Gross Margin | 76.5% | 16.8% |
| Operating Margin | -6.9% | 11.0% |
| Forward P/E | 7.6x | 45.5x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $2.02B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $503M |
ACCS vs BWXT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACCESS Newswire Inc. (ACCS) | 100 | 94.2 | -5.8% |
| BWX Technologies, I… (BWXT) | 100 | 188.3 | +88.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACCS vs BWXT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACCS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta -0.30, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 0.88x
- PEG 0.52 vs BWXT's 10.61
- Lower P/E (7.6x vs 45.5x), PEG 0.52 vs 10.61
BWXT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.60, yield 0.5%
- Rev growth 18.3%, EPS growth 16.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.7%
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs ACCS's 2.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.3% revenue growth vs ACCS's -1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.6x vs 45.5x), PEG 0.52 vs 10.61 | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.0% margin vs BWXT's 10.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (3.9% vs 163.4%) | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +95.6% vs ACCS's -7.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.6% ROA vs BWXT's 8.6%, ROIC -3.5% vs 10.1% |
ACCS vs BWXT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ACCS vs BWXT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BWXT is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 149.3x ACCS's $23M. ACCS is the more profitable business, keeping 19.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BWXT's 10.2%. On growth, ACCS holds the edge at +3.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23M | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1M | $458M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $345M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $407,000 | $328M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.5% | +16.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | +11.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +10.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.0% | +26.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.0% | +20.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ACCS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.6x trailing earnings, ACCS trades at a 87% valuation discount to BWXT's 58.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ACCS offers better value at 0.52x vs BWXT's 13.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32M | $19.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31M | $20.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.59x | 58.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 45.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.52x | 13.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.09x | 47.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.43x | 6.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.07x | 15.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 60.26x | 65.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACCS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BWXT delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $14 for ACCS. ACCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BWXT's 1.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACCS scores 7/9 vs BWXT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.0% | +27.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.6% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.5% | +10.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.2% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 1.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $503M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.42x | 10.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BWXT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BWXT five years ago would be worth $32,491 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,689 for ACCS. Over the past 12 months, BWXT leads with a +95.6% total return vs ACCS's -7.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BWXT at 48.4% vs ACCS's -1.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.2% | +15.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.2% | +95.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.1% | +226.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.1% | +224.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.1% | +551.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.0% | +48.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACCS and BWXT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACCS is the less volatile stock with a -0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BWXT's 1.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWXT currently trades 86.8% from its 52-week high vs ACCS's 63.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.30x | 1.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.35 | $241.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.51 | $105.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.1% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.0 | 48.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13K | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
BWXT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
BWXT is the only dividend payer here at 0.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $210.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% |
ACCS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BWXT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
ACCS vs BWXT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACCS or BWXT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) is the stronger pick with 18. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for ACCESS Newswire Inc. (ACCS). ACCESS Newswire Inc. (ACCS) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACCS or BWXT?
On trailing P/E, ACCESS Newswire Inc.
(ACCS) is the cheapest at 7. 6x versus BWX Technologies, Inc. at 58. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACCS or BWXT?
Over the past 5 years, BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) delivered a total return of +224. 9%, compared to -3. 1% for ACCESS Newswire Inc. (ACCS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BWXT returned +551. 5% versus ACCS's +2. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACCS or BWXT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ACCESS Newswire Inc.
(ACCS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 30β versus BWX Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 60β — meaning BWXT is approximately -641% more volatile than ACCS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ACCESS Newswire Inc. (ACCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 163% for BWX Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACCS or BWXT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) is pulling ahead at 18. 3% versus -1. 9% for ACCESS Newswire Inc. (ACCS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACCESS Newswire Inc. grew EPS 139. 4% year-over-year, compared to 16. 9% for BWX Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BWXT leads at 12. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACCS or BWXT?
ACCESS Newswire Inc.
(ACCS) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus 10. 3% for BWX Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BWXT leads at 10. 1% versus -6. 9% for ACCS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACCS leads at 76. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — ACCS or BWXT?
In this comparison, BWXT (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. ACCS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is ACCS or BWXT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ACCESS Newswire Inc.
(ACCS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 30)). BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) carries a higher beta of 1. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACCS: +2. 1%, BWXT: +551. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ACCS and BWXT?
These companies operate in different sectors (ACCS (Communication Services) and BWXT (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ACCS is a small-cap deep-value stock; BWXT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 149%
- Net Margin > 11%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.