Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ADGM vs BEAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
ADGM vs BEAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $15M | $35M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $-143K | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-75M | $-21M |
| Gross Margin | -6.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -232.3% | — |
| Total Debt | $16M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $4M |
ADGM vs BEAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adagio Medical Hold… (ADGM) | 100 | 18.5 | -81.5% |
| HeartBeam, Inc. (BEAT) | 100 | 37.0 | -63.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ADGM vs BEAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ADGM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.87
- Rev growth -10.3%, EPS growth 27.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 81.7%, current ratio 3.27x
BEAT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -81.4% 10Y total return vs ADGM's -89.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -10.3% revenue growth vs BEAT's -100.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs BEAT's 1.24 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -26.1% vs BEAT's -53.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -189.8% ROA vs BEAT's -353.1% |
ADGM vs BEAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ADGM vs BEAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEAT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEAT and ADGM operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and -$143,000 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$143,000 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$67M | -$21M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$75M | -$21M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$24M | -$15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -232.3% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -199.9% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -115.6% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -106.3% | +22.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ADGM and BEAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15M | $35M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $31M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.27x | -1.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 54.49x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.73x | 11.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BEAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BEAT delivers a -5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-8 for ADGM. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADGM scores 4/9 vs BEAT's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.5% | -5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -189.8% | -3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -374.1% | -4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$4M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -36.69x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BEAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BEAT five years ago would be worth $1,856 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,053 for ADGM. Over the past 12 months, ADGM leads with a -26.1% total return vs BEAT's -53.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BEAT at -25.8% vs ADGM's -52.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.8% | -64.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.1% | -53.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | -59.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | -81.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | -81.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.8% | -25.8% |
Risk & Volatility
ADGM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADGM is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEAT's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ADGM currently trades 36.9% from its 52-week high vs BEAT's 21.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.58 | $4.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.74 | $0.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.9% | +21.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.3 | 37.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 124K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BEAT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ADGM leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
ADGM vs BEAT: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — ADGM or BEAT?
Over the past 5 years, HeartBeam, Inc.
(BEAT) delivered a total return of -81. 4%, compared to -89. 5% for Adagio Medical Holdings, Inc. (ADGM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BEAT returned -81. 4% versus ADGM's -89. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — ADGM or BEAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Adagio Medical Holdings, Inc.
(ADGM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus HeartBeam, Inc. 's 1. 24β — meaning BEAT is approximately 43% more volatile than ADGM relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — ADGM or BEAT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Adagio Medical Holdings, Inc.
grew EPS 27. 2% year-over-year, compared to 15. 1% for HeartBeam, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — ADGM or BEAT?
HeartBeam, Inc.
(BEAT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -199. 9% for Adagio Medical Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BEAT leads at 0. 0% versus -232. 3% for ADGM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BEAT leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — ADGM or BEAT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is ADGM or BEAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Adagio Medical Holdings, Inc.
(ADGM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADGM: -89. 5%, BEAT: -81. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between ADGM and BEAT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.