AFCG
Advanced Flower Capital Inc.
REIT - Specialty
Market Cap$65M
5Y Perf.-80.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
AFCG vs TPVG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
Asset Management
Market Cap$226M
5Y Perf.-61.5%
AFCG vs TPVG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | AFCG | TPVG |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $65M | $226M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $97M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-21M | $46M |
| Gross Margin | 66.0% | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | -393.9% | 77.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.0x |
| Total Debt | $76M | $469M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $20M |
AFCG vs TPVG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
AFCG
TPVG
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Flower Cap… (AFCG) | 100 | 19.3 | -80.7% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 38.5 | -61.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AFCG vs TPVG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TPVG leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Advanced Flower Capital Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AFCG
Advanced Flower Capital Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
AFCG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.86, yield 31.3%
- 31.3% yield, vs TPVG's 18.4%
Best for: income & stability
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
The Banking Pick
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- 87.8% 10Y total return vs AFCG's -44.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TPVG | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs AFCG's -39.6% |
| Quality / Margins | TPVG | 50.6% margin vs AFCG's -9.8% |
| Stability / Safety | TPVG | Beta 0.83 vs AFCG's 1.86 |
| Dividends | AFCG | 31.3% yield, vs TPVG's 18.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TPVG | +8.6% vs AFCG's -41.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TPVG | 5.6% ROA vs AFCG's -7.0%, ROIC 7.2% vs -4.1% |
AFCG vs TPVG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTPVGLAGGINGAFCG
AFCGAdvanced Flower Capit…
2leads
TPVGTriplePoint Venture G…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs AFCGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
TPVG3/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
AFCG3/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TPVG6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TPVG5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
TPVG2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
AFCG1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG is the larger business by revenue, generating $97M annually — 46.1x AFCG's $2M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AFCG's -9.8%.
| Metric | AFCGAdvanced Flower C… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $97M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | $63M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$21M | $46M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $11M | $35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.0% | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | +77.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.8% | +50.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | -58.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +185.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +174.7% | -100.0% |
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
AFCG leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | AFCGAdvanced Flower C… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $65M | $226M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $103M | $674M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.92x | 4.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.08x | 2.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.35x | 0.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.80x | — |
AFCG leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG delivers a 13.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-11 for AFCG. AFCG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.43x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TPVG scores 5/9 vs AFCG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | AFCGAdvanced Flower C… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.3% | +13.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.0% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.1% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.6% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $38M | $449M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $76M | $469M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.02x | 2.15x |
TPVG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TPVG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TPVG five years ago would be worth $8,097 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,497 for AFCG. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +8.6% total return vs AFCG's -41.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TPVG at -2.6% vs AFCG's -8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AFCGAdvanced Flower C… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.1% | -12.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -41.2% | +8.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.4% | -7.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.0% | -19.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.4% | +87.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.9% | -2.6% |
TPVG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TPVG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TPVG is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AFCG's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TPVG currently trades 74.0% from its 52-week high vs AFCG's 47.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AFCGAdvanced Flower C… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.86x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.87 | $7.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.06 | $4.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.2% | +74.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.1 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 218K | 498K |
TPVG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
AFCG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, AFCG offers the higher dividend yield at 31.34% vs TPVG's 18.40%.
| Metric | AFCGAdvanced Flower C… | TPVGTriplePoint Ventu… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +31.3% | +18.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.87 | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AFCG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
TPVG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AFCG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
Best OverallTriplePoint Venture Growth … (TPVG)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
AFCG vs TPVG: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AFCG or TPVG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 6% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 6x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AFCG or TPVG?
Over the past 5 years, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) delivered a total return of -19. 0%, compared to -45. 0% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +87. 8% versus AFCG's -44. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AFCG or TPVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Advanced Flower Capital Inc. 's 1. 86β — meaning AFCG is approximately 123% more volatile than TPVG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AFCG or TPVG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus -39. 6% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. grew EPS 48. 8% year-over-year, compared to -218. 8% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AFCG or TPVG?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -66. 0% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -43. 6% for AFCG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AFCG leads at 90. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AFCG or TPVG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG) offers the highest yield at 31. 3%, versus 18. 4% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG).
07Is AFCG or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 18. 4% yield). Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPVG: +87. 8%, AFCG: -44. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AFCG and TPVG?
These companies operate in different sectors (AFCG (Real Estate) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AFCG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(AFCG: 185.4% · TPVG: 36.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.