Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ALDX vs OCUL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
ALDX vs OCUL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $105M | $2.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $52M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-43M | $-290M |
| Gross Margin | — | 87.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -5.8% |
| Forward P/E | 24.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $15M | $80M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $55M | $737M |
ALDX vs OCUL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aldeyra Therapeutic… (ALDX) | 100 | 35.4 | -64.6% |
| Ocular Therapeutix,… (OCUL) | 100 | 137.9 | +37.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALDX vs OCUL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALDX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth and quality.
- 3.6% revenue growth vs OCUL's -18.7%
- 4.1% margin vs OCUL's -5.6%
OCUL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.27
- Rev growth -18.7%, EPS growth -16.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.2%
- -4.4% 10Y total return vs ALDX's -71.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs OCUL's -18.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.1% margin vs OCUL's -5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.27 vs ALDX's 1.45, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.2% vs ALDX's -17.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -48.4% ROA vs ALDX's -55.5% |
ALDX vs OCUL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ALDX vs OCUL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALDX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OCUL and ALDX operate at a comparable scale, with $52M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $52M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$45M | -$296M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$43M | -$290M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$40M | -$241M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +87.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -5.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -5.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +0.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.0% | -5.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ALDX and OCUL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $105M | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $65M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.85x | -6.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.86x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 40.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 2.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OCUL leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OCUL delivers a -64.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-65 in annual profit, vs $-88 for ALDX. OCUL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALDX's 0.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OCUL scores 4/9 vs ALDX's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -87.7% | -64.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -55.5% | -48.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.7% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -56.7% | -46.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$39M | -$657M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $55M | $737M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $80M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -21.72x | -31.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OCUL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OCUL five years ago would be worth $6,118 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,444 for ALDX. Over the past 12 months, OCUL leads with a +35.2% total return vs ALDX's -17.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OCUL at 14.9% vs ALDX's -45.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -62.7% | -17.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.1% | +35.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.7% | +51.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.6% | -38.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.9% | -4.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -45.3% | +14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
OCUL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OCUL is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALDX's 1.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OCUL currently trades 59.1% from its 52-week high vs ALDX's 28.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.18 | $16.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.07 | $6.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.2% | +59.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.9 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 4.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ALDX as "Buy" and OCUL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 455.7% upside for ALDX (target: $10) vs 162.6% for OCUL (target: $26).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.67 | $25.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
OCUL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ALDX leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
ALDX vs OCUL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALDX or OCUL a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ALDX) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ALDX or OCUL?
Over the past 5 years, Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.
(OCUL) delivered a total return of -38. 8%, compared to -85. 6% for Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. (ALDX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OCUL returned -4. 4% versus ALDX's -71. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ALDX or OCUL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.
(OCUL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 27β versus Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning ALDX is approximately 14% more volatile than OCUL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. (OCUL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 22% for Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ALDX or OCUL?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.
grew EPS -16. 4% year-over-year, compared to -46. 9% for Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ALDX or OCUL?
Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ALDX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -513. 2% for Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALDX leads at 0. 0% versus -521. 0% for OCUL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OCUL leads at 87. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ALDX or OCUL more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALDX: 455.
7% to $9. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — ALDX or OCUL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ALDX or OCUL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ocular Therapeutix, Inc.
(OCUL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 27)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OCUL: -4. 4%, ALDX: -71. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ALDX and OCUL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.