Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ALTS vs CIFR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
ALTS vs CIFR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $10M | $8.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25M | $224M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $-898M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 28.4% |
| Operating Margin | -90.1% | -150.7% |
| Total Debt | $13M | $2.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $628M |
ALTS vs CIFR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALT5 Sigma Corporat… (ALTS) | 100 | 51.8 | -48.2% |
| Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) | 100 | 246.0 | +146.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALTS vs CIFR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALTS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 2.77
- Rev growth 250.1%, EPS growth 68.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -32.1%
- 204.5% 10Y total return vs CIFR's 108.9%
CIFR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +5.8% vs ALTS's -84.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 250.1% revenue growth vs CIFR's 48.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 133.1% margin vs CIFR's -367.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.77 vs CIFR's 3.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.8% vs ALTS's -84.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.0% ROA vs CIFR's -24.7%, ROIC -40.4% vs -11.7% |
ALTS vs CIFR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ALTS vs CIFR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALTS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIFR is the larger business by revenue, generating $224M annually — 9.0x ALTS's $25M. ALTS is the more profitable business, keeping 133.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CIFR's -3.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25M | $224M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | -$203M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | -$898M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | -$930M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.9% | +28.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -90.1% | -150.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +133.1% | -3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -70.0% | -3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.5% | -154.5% |
Valuation Metrics
ALTS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10M | $8.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15M | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.53x | -9.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.76x | 37.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.38x | 9.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.36x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALTS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALTS delivers a 2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-116 for CIFR. ALTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIFR's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALTS scores 6/9 vs CIFR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.1% | -115.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | -24.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -40.4% | -11.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -28.0% | -15.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 3.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $628M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $2.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.66x | -32.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CIFR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CIFR five years ago would be worth $20,789 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,890 for ALTS. Over the past 12 months, CIFR leads with a +584.9% total return vs ALTS's -84.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIFR at 119.7% vs ALTS's -23.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.3% | +27.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -84.9% | +584.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.2% | +960.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.9% | +107.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +204.5% | +108.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.5% | +119.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALTS and CIFR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALTS is the less volatile stock with a 2.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIFR's 3.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CIFR currently trades 81.1% from its 52-week high vs ALTS's 7.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.77x | 3.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.95 | $25.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.82 | $2.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.8% | +81.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.1 | 67.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 24.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% |
ALTS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CIFR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
ALTS vs CIFR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALTS or CIFR a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Cipher Mining Inc.
(CIFR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ALTS or CIFR?
Over the past 5 years, Cipher Mining Inc.
(CIFR) delivered a total return of +107. 9%, compared to +8. 9% for ALT5 Sigma Corporation (ALTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALTS returned +204. 5% versus CIFR's +108. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ALTS or CIFR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ALT5 Sigma Corporation (ALTS) is the lower-risk stock at 2.
77β versus Cipher Mining Inc. 's 3. 87β — meaning CIFR is approximately 40% more volatile than ALTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ALT5 Sigma Corporation (ALTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 3% for Cipher Mining Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ALTS or CIFR?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ALT5 Sigma Corporation grew EPS 68.
2% year-over-year, compared to -1435. 7% for Cipher Mining Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ALTS or CIFR?
ALT5 Sigma Corporation (ALTS) is the more profitable company, earning -49.
8% net margin versus -367. 2% for Cipher Mining Inc. — meaning it keeps -49. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALTS leads at -60. 3% versus -150. 7% for CIFR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALTS leads at 50. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ALTS or CIFR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ALTS or CIFR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ALT5 Sigma Corporation (ALTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+204.
5% 10Y return). Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) carries a higher beta of 3. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALTS: +204. 5%, CIFR: +108. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ALTS and CIFR?
These companies operate in different sectors (ALTS (Technology) and CIFR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ALTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CIFR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.