Packaging & Containers
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
AMBP vs BALL vs CCK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
AMBP vs BALL vs CCK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $2.36B | $15.55B | $11.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.73B | $13.64B | $12.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $937M | $737M |
| Gross Margin | 10.0% | 11.0% | 18.3% |
| Operating Margin | 4.9% | 8.2% | 13.2% |
| Forward P/E | 16.0x | 14.7x | 12.5x |
| Total Debt | $4.42B | $7.01B | $6.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $522M | $1.21B | $879M |
AMBP vs BALL vs CCK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ardagh Metal Packag… (AMBP) | 100 | 39.2 | -60.8% |
| Ball Corporation (BALL) | 100 | 70.3 | -29.7% |
| Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) | 100 | 131.6 | +31.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMBP vs BALL vs CCK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMBP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 59.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
- 12.0% revenue growth vs CCK's 4.8%
- 11.1% yield, vs CCK's 1.0%
BALL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.40, yield 1.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, current ratio 1.11x
- Beta 0.40, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.11x
CCK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 98.0% 10Y total return vs BALL's 79.5%
- PEG 0.82 vs BALL's 1.09
- Lower P/E (12.5x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.82 vs 1.09
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.0% revenue growth vs CCK's 4.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.5x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.82 vs 1.09 | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.9% margin vs AMBP's 0.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs AMBP's 0.81 | |
| Dividends | 11.1% yield, vs CCK's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.2% vs CCK's +5.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs AMBP's 0.2%, ROIC 14.1% vs 6.5% |
AMBP vs BALL vs CCK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMBP vs BALL vs CCK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BALL is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.6B annually — 2.4x AMBP's $5.7B. BALL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMBP's 0.2%. On growth, AMBP holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.7B | $13.6B | $12.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $753M | $1.4B | $2.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | $937M | $737M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $209M | $596M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +11.0% | +18.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +8.2% | +13.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | +6.9% | +6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +4.4% | +8.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.6% | +16.2% | +7.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +58.0% | +22.2% | -56.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AMBP and CCK each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, CCK trades at a 10% valuation discount to BALL's 17.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CCK offers better value at 1.05x vs BALL's 1.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.4B | $15.6B | $11.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.3B | $21.4B | $16.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -214.95x | 17.70x | 15.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.97x | 14.74x | 12.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.31x | 1.05x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.47x | 10.61x | 7.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.43x | 1.18x | 0.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.97x | 3.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.92x | 19.74x | 10.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CCK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CCK delivers a 21.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $17 for BALL. BALL carries lower financial leverage with a 1.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CCK's 1.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCK scores 7/9 vs BALL's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +17.2% | +21.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | +4.9% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.5% | +9.4% | +14.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.9% | +10.4% | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.29x | 1.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.9B | $5.8B | $5.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $522M | $1.2B | $879M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.4B | $7.0B | $6.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.08x | 6.99x | 4.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMBP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CCK five years ago would be worth $9,314 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,388 for AMBP. Over the past 12 months, AMBP leads with a +20.2% total return vs CCK's +5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMBP at 10.4% vs BALL's 1.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.3% | +9.9% | -2.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.2% | +16.9% | +5.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.6% | +5.4% | +23.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.1% | -31.2% | -6.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.4% | +79.5% | +98.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.4% | +1.8% | +7.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BALL and CCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BALL is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMBP's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CCK currently trades 86.7% from its 52-week high vs AMBP's 78.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 0.40x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.03 | $68.29 | $116.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.29 | $44.83 | $89.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.6% | +85.5% | +86.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.5 | 41.7 | 46.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 2.2M | 984K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AMBP and CCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMBP as "Hold", BALL as "Buy", CCK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.3% upside for BALL (target: $70) vs 14.3% for AMBP (target: $5). For income investors, AMBP offers the higher dividend yield at 11.08% vs CCK's 1.03%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.52 | $70.25 | $120.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 23 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.1% | +1.4% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.44 | $0.80 | $1.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.5% | +4.4% |
CCK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMBP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
AMBP vs BALL vs CCK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMBP or BALL or CCK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ardagh Metal Packaging S.
A. (AMBP) is the stronger pick with 12. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 8% for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK). Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (12. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ball Corporation (BALL) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMBP or BALL or CCK?
On trailing P/E, Crown Holdings, Inc.
(CCK) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Ball Corporation at 17. 7x. On forward P/E, Crown Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Crown Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 82x versus Ball Corporation's 1. 09x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMBP or BALL or CCK?
Over the past 5 years, Crown Holdings, Inc.
(CCK) delivered a total return of -6. 9%, compared to -46. 1% for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. (AMBP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCK returned +98. 0% versus AMBP's -44. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMBP or BALL or CCK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ball Corporation (BALL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
40β versus Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. 's 0. 81β — meaning AMBP is approximately 101% more volatile than BALL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ball Corporation (BALL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 129% versus 177% for Crown Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMBP or BALL or CCK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ardagh Metal Packaging S.
A. (AMBP) is pulling ahead at 12. 0% versus 4. 8% for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Crown Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 79. 7% year-over-year, compared to -74. 6% for Ball Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMBP leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMBP or BALL or CCK?
Ball Corporation (BALL) is the more profitable company, earning 6.
9% net margin versus 0. 2% for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCK leads at 13. 2% versus 5. 0% for AMBP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCK leads at 18. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMBP or BALL or CCK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus Ball Corporation's 1. 09x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) trades at 12. 5x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. — 3. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BALL: 20. 3% to $70. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMBP or BALL or CCK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. (AMBP) offers the highest yield at 11. 1%, versus 1. 0% for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK).
09Is AMBP or BALL or CCK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ball Corporation (BALL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
40), 1. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BALL: +79. 5%, AMBP: -44. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMBP and BALL and CCK?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMBP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BALL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CCK is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.