Compare Stocks

3 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMBP vs BALL vs CCK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMBP
Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • LU
Market Cap$2.36B
5Y Perf.-60.8%
BALL
Ball Corporation

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$15.55B
5Y Perf.-29.7%
CCK
Crown Holdings, Inc.

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$11.35B
5Y Perf.+31.6%

AMBP vs BALL vs CCK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMBP logoAMBP
BALL logoBALL
CCK logoCCK
IndustryPackaging & ContainersPackaging & ContainersPackaging & Containers
Market Cap$2.36B$15.55B$11.35B
Revenue (TTM)$5.73B$13.64B$12.37B
Net Income (TTM)$11M$937M$737M
Gross Margin10.0%11.0%18.3%
Operating Margin4.9%8.2%13.2%
Forward P/E16.0x14.7x12.5x
Total Debt$4.42B$7.01B$6.17B
Cash & Equiv.$522M$1.21B$879M

AMBP vs BALL vs CCKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMBP
BALL
CCK
StockSep 20May 26Return
Ardagh Metal Packag… (AMBP)10039.2-60.8%
Ball Corporation (BALL)10070.3-29.7%
Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK)100131.6+31.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMBP vs BALL vs CCK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMBP leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. Ball Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AMBP
Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.
The Growth Play

AMBP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 59.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
  • 12.0% revenue growth vs CCK's 4.8%
  • 11.1% yield, vs CCK's 1.0%
Best for: growth exposure
BALL
Ball Corporation
The Income Pick

BALL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.40, yield 1.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.40, current ratio 1.11x
  • Beta 0.40, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.11x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CCK
Crown Holdings, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CCK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 98.0% 10Y total return vs BALL's 79.5%
  • PEG 0.82 vs BALL's 1.09
  • Lower P/E (12.5x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.82 vs 1.09
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAMBP logoAMBP12.0% revenue growth vs CCK's 4.8%
ValueCCK logoCCKLower P/E (12.5x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.82 vs 1.09
Quality / MarginsBALL logoBALL6.9% margin vs AMBP's 0.2%
Stability / SafetyBALL logoBALLBeta 0.40 vs AMBP's 0.81
DividendsAMBP logoAMBP11.1% yield, vs CCK's 1.0%
Momentum (1Y)AMBP logoAMBP+20.2% vs CCK's +5.3%
Efficiency (ROA)CCK logoCCK5.2% ROA vs AMBP's 0.2%, ROIC 14.1% vs 6.5%

AMBP vs BALL vs CCK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMBPArdagh Metal Packaging S.A.

Segment breakdown not available.

BALLBall Corporation
FY 2025
Metal Beverage Packaging Americas and Asia
50.6%$6.3B
Metal Beverage Packaging Europe
32.0%$4.0B
Metal Food and Household Products Packaging Americas
17.4%$2.2B
CCKCrown Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Metal Beverage Cans And Ends
69.0%$8.5B
Transit Packaging
16.4%$2.0B
Metal Food Cans And Ends
7.6%$943M
Other Metal Packaging
3.5%$433M
Other Products
3.5%$428M

AMBP vs BALL vs CCK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCCKLAGGINGBALL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CCK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

BALL is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.6B annually — 2.4x AMBP's $5.7B. BALL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMBP's 0.2%. On growth, AMBP holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…BALL logoBALLBall CorporationCCK logoCCKCrown Holdings, I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.7B$13.6B$12.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$753M$1.4B$2.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$11M$937M$737M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$209M$596M$1.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+10.0%+11.0%+18.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.9%+8.2%+13.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.2%+6.9%+6.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.6%+4.4%+8.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+18.6%+16.2%+7.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+58.0%+22.2%-56.6%
CCK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — AMBP and CCK each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 15.8x trailing earnings, CCK trades at a 10% valuation discount to BALL's 17.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CCK offers better value at 1.05x vs BALL's 1.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…BALL logoBALLBall CorporationCCK logoCCKCrown Holdings, I…
Market CapShares × price$2.4B$15.6B$11.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.3B$21.4B$16.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-214.95x17.70x15.85x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.97x14.74x12.46x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.31x1.05x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.47x10.61x7.96x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.43x1.18x0.92x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.97x3.36x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.92x19.74x10.34x
Evenly matched — AMBP and CCK each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CCK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

CCK delivers a 21.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $17 for BALL. BALL carries lower financial leverage with a 1.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CCK's 1.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCK scores 7/9 vs BALL's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…BALL logoBALLBall CorporationCCK logoCCKCrown Holdings, I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.2%+21.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.2%+4.9%+5.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.5%+9.4%+14.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.9%+10.4%+16.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9667
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.29x1.77x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.9B$5.8B$5.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$522M$1.2B$879M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4.4B$7.0B$6.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.08x6.99x4.00x
CCK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AMBP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CCK five years ago would be worth $9,314 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,388 for AMBP. Over the past 12 months, AMBP leads with a +20.2% total return vs CCK's +5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMBP at 10.4% vs BALL's 1.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…BALL logoBALLBall CorporationCCK logoCCKCrown Holdings, I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-2.3%+9.9%-2.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+20.2%+16.9%+5.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+34.6%+5.4%+23.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-46.1%-31.2%-6.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-44.4%+79.5%+98.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+10.4%+1.8%+7.3%
AMBP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BALL and CCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BALL is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMBP's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CCK currently trades 86.7% from its 52-week high vs AMBP's 78.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…BALL logoBALLBall CorporationCCK logoCCKCrown Holdings, I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.81x0.40x0.48x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.03$68.29$116.62
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.29$44.83$89.21
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.6%+85.5%+86.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.541.746.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.5M2.2M984K
Evenly matched — BALL and CCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — AMBP and CCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: AMBP as "Hold", BALL as "Buy", CCK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.3% upside for BALL (target: $70) vs 14.3% for AMBP (target: $5). For income investors, AMBP offers the higher dividend yield at 11.08% vs CCK's 1.03%.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…BALL logoBALLBall CorporationCCK logoCCKCrown Holdings, I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.52$70.25$120.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts62325
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+11.1%+1.4%+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises018
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.44$0.80$1.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+8.5%+4.4%
Evenly matched — AMBP and CCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CCK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMBP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallCrown Holdings, Inc. (CCK)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMBP vs BALL vs CCK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMBP or BALL or CCK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ardagh Metal Packaging S.

A. (AMBP) is the stronger pick with 12. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 8% for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK). Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (12. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ball Corporation (BALL) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMBP or BALL or CCK?

On trailing P/E, Crown Holdings, Inc.

(CCK) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Ball Corporation at 17. 7x. On forward P/E, Crown Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Crown Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 82x versus Ball Corporation's 1. 09x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMBP or BALL or CCK?

Over the past 5 years, Crown Holdings, Inc.

(CCK) delivered a total return of -6. 9%, compared to -46. 1% for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. (AMBP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCK returned +98. 0% versus AMBP's -44. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMBP or BALL or CCK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ball Corporation (BALL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

40β versus Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. 's 0. 81β — meaning AMBP is approximately 101% more volatile than BALL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ball Corporation (BALL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 129% versus 177% for Crown Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AMBP or BALL or CCK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ardagh Metal Packaging S.

A. (AMBP) is pulling ahead at 12. 0% versus 4. 8% for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Crown Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 79. 7% year-over-year, compared to -74. 6% for Ball Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMBP leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMBP or BALL or CCK?

Ball Corporation (BALL) is the more profitable company, earning 6.

9% net margin versus 0. 2% for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCK leads at 13. 2% versus 5. 0% for AMBP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCK leads at 18. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AMBP or BALL or CCK more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus Ball Corporation's 1. 09x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) trades at 12. 5x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. — 3. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BALL: 20. 3% to $70. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AMBP or BALL or CCK?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. (AMBP) offers the highest yield at 11. 1%, versus 1. 0% for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK).

09

Is AMBP or BALL or CCK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Ball Corporation (BALL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

40), 1. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BALL: +79. 5%, AMBP: -44. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AMBP and BALL and CCK?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AMBP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BALL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CCK is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AMBP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 4.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BALL

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CCK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AMBP and BALL and CCK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AMBP: 18.6% · BALL: 16.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.