Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
AMIX vs NVCR vs BSX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
AMIX vs NVCR vs BSX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $675K | $1.92B | $84.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $674M | $20.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $-173M | $2.89B |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.2% | 69.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -27.2% | 19.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 16.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $290M | $12.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $103M | $2.04B |
AMIX vs NVCR vs BSX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autonomix Medical, … (AMIX) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 120.9 | +20.9% |
| Boston Scientific C… (BSX) | 100 | 89.4 | -10.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMIX vs NVCR vs BSX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMIX is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.00, current ratio 5.63x
NVCR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +1.1% vs AMIX's -78.9%
BSX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.34
- Rev growth 19.9%, EPS growth 55.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.5%
- 155.5% 10Y total return vs NVCR's 30.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.9% revenue growth vs AMIX's -27.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.4% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.1% vs AMIX's -78.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs AMIX's -168.8% |
AMIX vs NVCR vs BSX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AMIX vs NVCR vs BSX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSX and AMIX operate at a comparable scale, with $20.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. BSX is the more profitable business, keeping 14.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, BSX holds the edge at +15.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $674M | $20.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$17M | -$165M | $4.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | -$173M | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | -$48M | $3.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +75.2% | +69.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -27.2% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -25.7% | +14.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -7.1% | +18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +12.3% | +15.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +75.3% | -100.0% | +18.5% |
Valuation Metrics
NVCR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $675,318 | $1.9B | $84.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$8M | $2.1B | $94.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.06x | -13.80x | 29.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 16.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 25.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.92x | 4.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.08x | 5.51x | 3.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 22.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BSX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BSX delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-2 for AMIX. BSX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BSX scores 7/9 vs AMIX's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.0% | -50.8% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -168.8% | -16.5% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -16.4% | +8.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -138.5% | -28.9% | +11.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.85x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9M | $187M | $10.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $103M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $290M | $12.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -375.57x | -96.80x | 11.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BSX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSX five years ago would be worth $13,117 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $38 for AMIX. Over the past 12 months, NVCR leads with a +1.1% total return vs AMIX's -78.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BSX at 2.1% vs AMIX's -84.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.8% | +28.3% | -40.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -78.9% | +1.1% | -46.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -75.7% | +6.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -91.3% | +31.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +30.3% | +155.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -84.4% | -37.6% | +2.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVCR and BSX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BSX is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs AMIX's 14.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 2.20x | 0.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.64 | $20.06 | $109.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.32 | $9.82 | $54.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +14.5% | +83.9% | +51.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.6 | 69.8 | 33.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 132K | 1.5M | 15.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVCR as "Buy", BSX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 61.4% for BSX (target: $91).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $33.50 | $91.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BSX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NVCR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AMIX vs NVCR vs BSX: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMIX or NVCR or BSX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the stronger pick with 19.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) offers the better valuation at 29. 2x trailing P/E (16. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NovoCure Limited (NVCR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AMIX or NVCR or BSX?
Over the past 5 years, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) delivered a total return of +31.
2%, compared to -99. 6% for Autonomix Medical, Inc. Common Stock (AMIX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BSX returned +155. 5% versus AMIX's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AMIX or NVCR or BSX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
34β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 541% more volatile than BSX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AMIX or NVCR or BSX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is pulling ahead at 19.
9% versus 8. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Autonomix Medical, Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 69. 4% year-over-year, compared to 21. 8% for NovoCure Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, BSX leads at 16. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AMIX or NVCR or BSX?
Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
4% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 14. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSX leads at 19. 8% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AMIX or NVCR or BSX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99.
0% to $33. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — AMIX or NVCR or BSX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is AMIX or NVCR or BSX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
34), +155. 5% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BSX: +155. 5%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AMIX and NVCR and BSX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMIX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BSX is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.