Construction Materials
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AMRZ vs MLM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction Materials
AMRZ vs MLM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction Materials | Construction Materials |
| Market Cap | $31.16B | $37.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11.81B | $6.55B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.22B | $2.53B |
| Gross Margin | 25.7% | 29.6% |
| Operating Margin | 16.1% | 22.7% |
| Forward P/E | 19.6x | 31.5x |
| Total Debt | $5.91B | $5.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.92B | $67M |
AMRZ vs MLM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amrize Ltd (AMRZ) | 100 | 110.9 | +10.9% |
| Martin Marietta Mat… (MLM) | 100 | 112.1 | +12.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMRZ vs MLM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMRZ is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.9%, EPS growth -7.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.3%
- 0.9% revenue growth vs MLM's 0.1%
- Lower P/E (19.6x vs 31.5x)
MLM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 0.5%
- 259.4% 10Y total return vs AMRZ's 6.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 53.0%, current ratio 3.57x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.9% revenue growth vs MLM's 0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.6x vs 31.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.7% margin vs AMRZ's 10.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs AMRZ's 1.32 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.7% vs AMRZ's +6.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.3% ROA vs AMRZ's 5.0%, ROIC 7.6% vs 9.2% |
AMRZ vs MLM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMRZ vs MLM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MLM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMRZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.8B annually — 1.8x MLM's $6.6B. MLM is the more profitable business, keeping 38.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMRZ's 10.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.8B | $6.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.8B | $2.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.2B | $2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.4B | $1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +29.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +22.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.3% | +38.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +15.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.4% | +0.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -34.9% | +12.2% |
Valuation Metrics
AMRZ leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.7x trailing earnings, AMRZ trades at a 22% valuation discount to MLM's 32.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMRZ's 12.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MLM's 19.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $31.2B | $37.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $35.1B | $42.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.68x | 32.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.60x | 31.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.46x | 19.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.64x | 5.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.30x | 3.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.94x | 37.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MLM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MLM delivers a 25.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $9 for AMRZ. AMRZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MLM's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MLM scores 7/9 vs AMRZ's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.2% | +25.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.0% | +13.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.9% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.0B | $5.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.9B | $67M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.9B | $5.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.23x | 6.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MLM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MLM five years ago would be worth $16,903 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,654 for AMRZ. Over the past 12 months, MLM leads with a +15.7% total return vs AMRZ's +6.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MLM at 16.4% vs AMRZ's 2.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.1% | -2.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.5% | +15.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.5% | +57.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.5% | +69.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.5% | +259.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.1% | +16.4% |
Risk & Volatility
MLM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MLM is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMRZ's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MLM currently trades 86.6% from its 52-week high vs AMRZ's 83.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $65.94 | $710.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $44.12 | $530.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.3% | +86.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 46.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 492K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AMRZ as "Buy" and MLM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.3% upside for AMRZ (target: $66) vs 13.0% for MLM (target: $695). MLM is the only dividend payer here at 0.53% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $66.11 | $695.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 40 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.26 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% |
MLM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMRZ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
AMRZ vs MLM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMRZ or MLM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amrize Ltd (AMRZ) is the stronger pick with 0.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM). Amrize Ltd (AMRZ) offers the better valuation at 25. 7x trailing P/E (19. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amrize Ltd (AMRZ) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMRZ or MLM?
On trailing P/E, Amrize Ltd (AMRZ) is the cheapest at 25.
7x versus Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. at 32. 7x. On forward P/E, Amrize Ltd is actually cheaper at 19. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMRZ or MLM?
Over the past 5 years, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
(MLM) delivered a total return of +69. 0%, compared to +6. 5% for Amrize Ltd (AMRZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MLM returned +259. 4% versus AMRZ's +6. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMRZ or MLM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
(MLM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Amrize Ltd's 1. 32β — meaning AMRZ is approximately 51% more volatile than MLM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amrize Ltd (AMRZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 53% for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMRZ or MLM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amrize Ltd (AMRZ) is pulling ahead at 0.
9% versus 0. 1% for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amrize Ltd grew EPS -7. 0% year-over-year, compared to -42. 0% for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMRZ leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMRZ or MLM?
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
(MLM) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 4% net margin versus 10. 0% for Amrize Ltd — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MLM leads at 23. 3% versus 16. 1% for AMRZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MLM leads at 30. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMRZ or MLM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Amrize Ltd (AMRZ) trades at 19.
6x forward P/E versus 31. 5x for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — 11. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMRZ: 20. 3% to $66. 11.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMRZ or MLM?
In this comparison, MLM (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. AMRZ does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMRZ or MLM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
(MLM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 0. 5% yield, +259. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MLM: +259. 4%, AMRZ: +6. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMRZ and MLM?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
MLM pays a dividend while AMRZ does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.