APG vs MTZ

For growth investors, MasTec, Inc.

(MTZ) is the stronger pick with 16. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 7% for APi Group Corporation (APG). MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) offers the better valuation at 71. 6x trailing P/E (41. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate APi Group Corporation (APG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, APi Group Corporation is actually cheaper at 25.

0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, MasTec, Inc.

(MTZ) delivered a total return of +218. 1%, compared to +187. 4% for APi Group Corporation (APG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTZ returned +1488% versus APG's +511. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), APi Group Corporation (APG) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

26β versus MasTec, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning MTZ is approximately 42% more volatile than APG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 84% versus 96% for APi Group Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MasTec, Inc.

(MTZ) is pulling ahead at 16. 2% versus 12. 7% for APi Group Corporation (APG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MasTec, Inc. grew EPS 146. 1% year-over-year, compared to -23. 2% for APi Group Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTZ leads at 13. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

APi Group Corporation (APG) is the more profitable company, earning 3.

8% net margin versus 2. 8% for MasTec, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APG leads at 7. 0% versus 4. 6% for MTZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — APG leads at 31. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, APi Group Corporation (APG) trades at 25.

0x forward P/E versus 41. 1x for MasTec, Inc. — 16. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APG: 24. 0% to $52. 50.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, MasTec, Inc.

(MTZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1488% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTZ: +1488%, APG: +511. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: APG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MTZ is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.