Real Estate - Development
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
ARL vs IRT vs NHI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
ARL vs IRT vs NHI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | REIT - Residential | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $223M | $3.86B | $3.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $50M | $662M | $403M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $48M | $148M |
| Gross Margin | -36.9% | 20.2% | 61.3% |
| Operating Margin | -11.2% | 17.5% | 48.5% |
| Forward P/E | 0.7x | 99.9x | 22.2x |
| Total Debt | $214M | $2.28B | $1.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $48M | $20M |
ARL vs IRT vs NHI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Realty Inv… (ARL) | 100 | 183.8 | +83.8% |
| Independence Realty… (IRT) | 100 | 165.5 | +65.5% |
| National Health Inv… (NHI) | 100 | 135.3 | +35.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARL vs IRT vs NHI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 197.4% 10Y total return vs IRT's 191.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 26.2%, current ratio 166.96x
- Lower P/E (0.7x vs 99.9x)
IRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 4.0%
- Beta 0.48, yield 4.0%, current ratio 0.05x
- Beta 0.48 vs ARL's 1.00
NHI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.9%, EPS growth -3.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.8%
- 12.9% FFO/revenue growth vs IRT's 2.8%
- 36.8% margin vs IRT's 7.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.9% FFO/revenue growth vs IRT's 2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.7x vs 99.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.8% margin vs IRT's 7.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs ARL's 1.00 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs NHI's 4.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.1% vs IRT's -11.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.4% ROA vs IRT's 0.8%, ROIC 5.6% vs 1.6% |
ARL vs IRT vs NHI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ARL vs IRT vs NHI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NHI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $662M annually — 13.1x ARL's $50M. NHI is the more profitable business, keeping 36.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IRT's 7.3%. On growth, NHI holds the edge at +29.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $50M | $662M | $403M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $365M | $282M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $48M | $148M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $139M | $226M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -36.9% | +20.2% | +61.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.2% | +17.5% | +48.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +7.3% | +36.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +21.1% | +56.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +2.5% | +29.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -116.7% | -101.4% | +10.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ARL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.2x trailing earnings, ARL trades at a 79% valuation discount to IRT's 68.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IRT's 16.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARL's 68.8x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $223M | $3.9B | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $423M | $6.1B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.23x | 68.21x | 24.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.66x | 99.88x | 22.17x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.23x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 68.82x | 16.71x | 17.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.46x | 5.87x | 9.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.27x | 1.07x | 2.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 26.33x | 16.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NHI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NHI delivers a 9.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $1 for IRT. ARL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NHI's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IRT scores 6/9 vs ARL's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.6% | +1.3% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +0.8% | +5.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | +1.6% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +2.4% | +8.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | 0.64x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $200M | $2.2B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $48M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $214M | $2.3B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.11x | 1.73x | 3.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ARL and NHI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARL five years ago would be worth $17,692 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,775 for IRT. Over the past 12 months, ARL leads with a +9.1% total return vs IRT's -11.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NHI at 20.2% vs ARL's -10.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.0% | -6.0% | -1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.1% | -11.9% | +2.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.7% | +7.4% | +73.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.9% | +17.8% | +31.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +197.4% | +191.8% | +58.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.2% | +2.4% | +20.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IRT and NHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NHI is the less volatile stock with a -0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARL's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IRT currently trades 83.5% from its 52-week high vs ARL's 69.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 0.48x | -0.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.00 | $19.61 | $90.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.95 | $14.60 | $68.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.0% | +83.5% | +82.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.3 | 62.4 | 28.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 2.2M | 332K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IRT and NHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IRT as "Buy", NHI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.7% upside for IRT (target: $20) vs 13.8% for NHI (target: $85). For income investors, NHI offers the higher dividend yield at 4.80% vs IRT's 4.02%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.08 | $85.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.0% | +4.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.66 | $3.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +0.8% | 0.0% |
NHI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
ARL vs IRT vs NHI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARL or IRT or NHI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) is the stronger pick with 12. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 8% for Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (IRT). American Realty Investors, Inc. (ARL) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (0. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (IRT) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARL or IRT or NHI?
On trailing P/E, American Realty Investors, Inc.
(ARL) is the cheapest at 14. 2x versus Independence Realty Trust, Inc. at 68. 2x. On forward P/E, American Realty Investors, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARL or IRT or NHI?
Over the past 5 years, American Realty Investors, Inc.
(ARL) delivered a total return of +76. 9%, compared to +17. 8% for Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (IRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARL returned +197. 4% versus NHI's +58. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARL or IRT or NHI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 08β versus American Realty Investors, Inc. 's 1. 00β — meaning ARL is approximately -1289% more volatile than NHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Realty Investors, Inc. (ARL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 76% for National Health Investors, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARL or IRT or NHI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) is pulling ahead at 12. 9% versus 2. 8% for Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (IRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Realty Investors, Inc. grew EPS 206. 6% year-over-year, compared to -3. 5% for National Health Investors, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NHI leads at 10. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARL or IRT or NHI?
National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 6% net margin versus 8. 6% for Independence Realty Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NHI leads at 51. 5% versus -12. 9% for ARL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NHI leads at 36. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARL or IRT or NHI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, American Realty Investors, Inc.
(ARL) trades at 0. 7x forward P/E versus 99. 9x for Independence Realty Trust, Inc. — 99. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IRT: 22. 7% to $20. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARL or IRT or NHI?
In this comparison, NHI (4.
8% yield), IRT (4. 0% yield) pay a dividend. ARL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ARL or IRT or NHI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 08), 4. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NHI: +58. 9%, ARL: +197. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARL and IRT and NHI?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ARL is a small-cap deep-value stock; IRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NHI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. IRT, NHI pay a dividend while ARL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.