Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ARMN vs MGY

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ARMN
Aris Mining Corporation

Gold

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$3.93B
5Y Perf.+747.1%
MGY
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.23B
5Y Perf.+37.8%

ARMN vs MGY — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ARMN logoARMN
MGY logoMGY
IndustryGoldOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$3.93B$5.23B
Revenue (TTM)$925M$1.32B
Net Income (TTM)$78M$322M
Gross Margin48.7%46.5%
Operating Margin38.9%32.7%
Forward P/E8.4x10.3x
Total Debt$526M$420M
Cash & Equiv.$392M$267M

ARMN vs MGYLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ARMN
MGY
StockSep 23Apr 26Return
Aris Mining Corpora… (ARMN)100847.1+747.1%
Magnolia Oil & Gas … (MGY)100137.8+37.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ARMN vs MGY

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MGY leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Aris Mining Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ARMN
Aris Mining Corporation
The Growth Play

ARMN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 81.7%, EPS growth 192.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.4%
  • 8.2% 10Y total return vs MGY's 203.8%
  • 81.7% revenue growth vs MGY's -0.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
MGY
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation
The Income Pick

MGY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 2.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.24, Low D/E 21.0%, current ratio 1.54x
  • Beta 0.24, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.54x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARMN logoARMN81.7% revenue growth vs MGY's -0.3%
ValueARMN logoARMNLower P/E (8.4x vs 10.3x)
Quality / MarginsMGY logoMGY24.4% margin vs ARMN's 8.4%
Stability / SafetyMGY logoMGYBeta 0.24 vs ARMN's 0.46, lower leverage
DividendsMGY logoMGY2.2% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ARMN logoARMN+231.0% vs MGY's +39.1%
Efficiency (ROA)MGY logoMGY11.1% ROA vs ARMN's 3.4%, ROIC 15.4% vs 18.3%

ARMN vs MGY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ARMNAris Mining Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

MGYMagnolia Oil & Gas Corporation
FY 2025
Oil and Condensate
82.8%$918M
Natural Gas
17.2%$190M

ARMN vs MGY — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMGYLAGGINGARMN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ARMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MGY and ARMN operate at a comparable scale, with $1.3B and $925M in trailing revenue. MGY is the more profitable business, keeping 24.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARMN's 8.4%. On growth, ARMN holds the edge at +104.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricARMN logoARMNAris Mining Corpo…MGY logoMGYMagnolia Oil & Ga…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$925M$1.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$346M$880M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$78M$322M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$100M$396M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+48.7%+46.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+38.9%+32.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+8.4%+24.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+10.8%+30.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+104.2%+2.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+92.3%0.0%
ARMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MGY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 16.1x trailing earnings, MGY trades at a 66% valuation discount to ARMN's 46.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGY's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARMN's 9.9x.

MetricARMN logoARMNAris Mining Corpo…MGY logoMGYMagnolia Oil & Ga…
Market CapShares × price$3.9B$5.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.1B$5.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS46.90x16.09x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.36x10.32x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.89x6.09x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.24x3.98x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.54x2.61x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF30.47x12.77x
MGY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MGY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

MGY delivers a 16.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $6 for ARMN. MGY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARMN's 0.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARMN scores 7/9 vs MGY's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricARMN logoARMNAris Mining Corpo…MGY logoMGYMagnolia Oil & Ga…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.0%+16.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.4%+11.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+18.3%+15.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+17.6%+17.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–976
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.36x0.21x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$134M$153M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$392M$267M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$526M$420M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense6.70x19.21x
MGY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ARMN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ARMN five years ago would be worth $92,093 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $24,655 for MGY. Over the past 12 months, ARMN leads with a +231.0% total return vs MGY's +39.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARMN at 108.9% vs MGY's 14.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricARMN logoARMNAris Mining Corpo…MGY logoMGYMagnolia Oil & Ga…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+21.6%+26.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+231.0%+39.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+811.4%+49.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+820.9%+146.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+824.8%+203.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+108.9%+14.4%
ARMN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

MGY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

MGY is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARMN's 0.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGY currently trades 85.9% from its 52-week high vs ARMN's 82.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricARMN logoARMNAris Mining Corpo…MGY logoMGYMagnolia Oil & Ga…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.46x0.24x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$23.29$32.76
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.54$20.45
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+82.6%+85.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.143.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.3M2.5M
MGY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MGY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates ARMN as "Buy" and MGY as "Buy". MGY is the only dividend payer here at 2.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricARMN logoARMNAris Mining Corpo…MGY logoMGYMagnolia Oil & Ga…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.11
# AnalystsCovering analysts126
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises05
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.61
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.9%
MGY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MGY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ARMN leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns).

Best OverallMagnolia Oil & Gas Corporat… (MGY)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ARMN vs MGY: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ARMN or MGY a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Aris Mining Corporation (ARMN) is the stronger pick with 81.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY). Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY) offers the better valuation at 16. 1x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aris Mining Corporation (ARMN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ARMN or MGY?

On trailing P/E, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY) is the cheapest at 16.

1x versus Aris Mining Corporation at 46. 9x. On forward P/E, Aris Mining Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ARMN or MGY?

Over the past 5 years, Aris Mining Corporation (ARMN) delivered a total return of +820.

9%, compared to +146. 6% for Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARMN returned +824. 8% versus MGY's +203. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ARMN or MGY?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

24β versus Aris Mining Corporation's 0. 46β — meaning ARMN is approximately 92% more volatile than MGY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 36% for Aris Mining Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ARMN or MGY?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aris Mining Corporation (ARMN) is pulling ahead at 81.

7% versus -0. 3% for Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aris Mining Corporation grew EPS 192. 9% year-over-year, compared to -9. 8% for Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARMN leads at 32. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ARMN or MGY?

Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY) is the more profitable company, earning 24.

8% net margin versus 8. 4% for Aris Mining Corporation — meaning it keeps 24. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARMN leads at 38. 5% versus 33. 5% for MGY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARMN leads at 49. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ARMN or MGY more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Aris Mining Corporation (ARMN) trades at 8.

4x forward P/E versus 10. 3x for Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ARMN or MGY?

In this comparison, MGY (2.

2% yield) pays a dividend. ARMN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ARMN or MGY better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

24), 2. 2% yield, +203. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGY: +203. 8%, ARMN: +824. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ARMN and MGY?

These companies operate in different sectors (ARMN (Basic Materials) and MGY (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ARMN is a small-cap high-growth stock; MGY is a small-cap deep-value stock. MGY pays a dividend while ARMN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

ARMN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 52%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MGY

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 14%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ARMN and MGY on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ARMN: 104.2% · MGY: 2.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(ARMN: 8.4% · MGY: 24.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ARMN: 46.9x · MGY: 16.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.