Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
ARTW vs LEGH vs TWIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
Industrial - Machinery
ARTW vs LEGH vs TWIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Residential Construction | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $13M | $514M | $266M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24M | $163M | $348M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $42M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 31.4% | 48.4% | 27.9% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | 30.2% | 3.3% |
| Forward P/E | 41.9x | 10.6x | 25.2x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $3M | $49M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2K | $8M | $16M |
ARTW vs LEGH vs TWIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Art's-Way Manufactu… (ARTW) | 100 | 131.4 | +31.4% |
| Legacy Housing Corp… (LEGH) | 100 | 165.8 | +65.8% |
| Twin Disc, Incorpor… (TWIN) | 100 | 335.3 | +235.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARTW vs LEGH vs TWIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARTW is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 11.5% ROA vs TWIN's 6.1%, ROIC 1.9% vs 3.9%
LEGH has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.80
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 3.51x
- Beta 0.80, current ratio 3.51x
TWIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth -117.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.9%
- 87.2% 10Y total return vs LEGH's 79.3%
- 15.5% revenue growth vs ARTW's -19.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.5% revenue growth vs ARTW's -19.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 25.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.0% margin vs TWIN's 6.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs ARTW's 1.18, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +156.5% vs LEGH's -13.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs TWIN's 6.1%, ROIC 1.9% vs 3.9% |
ARTW vs LEGH vs TWIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ARTW vs LEGH vs TWIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LEGH leads in 3 of 6 categories
TWIN leads 2 • ARTW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEGH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TWIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $348M annually — 14.5x ARTW's $24M. LEGH is the more profitable business, keeping 26.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TWIN's 6.3%. On growth, ARTW holds the edge at +9.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24M | $163M | $348M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $51M | $27M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $42M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $596,642 | $30M | -$70,000 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.4% | +48.4% | +27.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +30.2% | +3.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +26.0% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +18.3% | -0.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.5% | -3.7% | +0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +12.2% | +22.7% |
Valuation Metrics
LEGH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, LEGH trades at a 70% valuation discount to ARTW's 41.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LEGH's 10.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARTW's 39.3x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $514M | $266M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18M | $508M | $299M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 41.94x | 12.40x | -131.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.63x | 25.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 5.97x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 39.31x | 10.10x | 12.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.54x | 3.12x | 0.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.07x | 0.98x | 1.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.94x | 18.25x | 30.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LEGH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARTW delivers a 18.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $8 for LEGH. LEGH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARTW's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARTW scores 7/9 vs LEGH's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.1% | +8.1% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.5% | +7.4% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | +7.1% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +9.4% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.00x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | -$6M | $33M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1,860 | $8M | $16M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $3M | $49M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.55x | 1926.55x | 1.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TWIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TWIN five years ago would be worth $14,753 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,846 for ARTW. Over the past 12 months, TWIN leads with a +156.5% total return vs LEGH's -13.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWIN at 15.8% vs LEGH's -1.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.4% | +11.8% | +13.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.5% | -13.4% | +156.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.0% | -5.4% | +55.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.5% | +9.5% | +47.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.8% | +79.3% | +87.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.0% | -1.8% | +15.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LEGH and TWIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LEGH is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARTW's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TWIN currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs ARTW's 54.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.18x | 0.80x | 1.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.71 | $29.45 | $19.63 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.69 | $18.34 | $6.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.1% | +73.2% | +93.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 53.9 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 105K | 49K |
Analyst Outlook
TWIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LEGH as "Buy", TWIN as "Hold". TWIN is the only dividend payer here at 0.90% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +1.5% | +0.5% |
LEGH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TWIN leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
ARTW vs LEGH vs TWIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARTW or LEGH or TWIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) is the stronger pick with 15.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 1% for Art's-Way Manufacturing Co. , Inc. (ARTW). Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARTW or LEGH or TWIN?
On trailing P/E, Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) is the cheapest at 12.
4x versus Art's-Way Manufacturing Co. , Inc. at 41. 9x. On forward P/E, Legacy Housing Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARTW or LEGH or TWIN?
Over the past 5 years, Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) delivered a total return of +47.
5%, compared to -21. 5% for Art's-Way Manufacturing Co. , Inc. (ARTW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWIN returned +87. 2% versus ARTW's -17. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARTW or LEGH or TWIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Art's-Way Manufacturing Co. , Inc. 's 1. 18β — meaning ARTW is approximately 48% more volatile than LEGH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 40% for Art's-Way Manufacturing Co. , Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARTW or LEGH or TWIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) is pulling ahead at 15.
5% versus -19. 1% for Art's-Way Manufacturing Co. , Inc. (ARTW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Art's-Way Manufacturing Co. , Inc. grew EPS 13. 9% year-over-year, compared to -117. 7% for Twin Disc, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, TWIN leads at 11. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARTW or LEGH or TWIN?
Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
4% net margin versus -0. 6% for Twin Disc, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 25. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LEGH leads at 29. 4% versus 1. 9% for ARTW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LEGH leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARTW or LEGH or TWIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) trades at 10.
6x forward P/E versus 25. 2x for Twin Disc, Incorporated — 14. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARTW or LEGH or TWIN?
In this comparison, TWIN (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. ARTW, LEGH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ARTW or LEGH or TWIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
04), 0. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TWIN: +87. 2%, ARTW: -17. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARTW and LEGH and TWIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (ARTW (Industrials) and LEGH (Consumer Cyclical) and TWIN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ARTW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LEGH is a small-cap deep-value stock; TWIN is a small-cap high-growth stock. TWIN pays a dividend while ARTW, LEGH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.