Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ASC vs TRMD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
ASC vs TRMD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $767M | $3.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $310M | $1.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $41M | $277M |
| Gross Margin | 28.8% | 47.2% |
| Operating Margin | 20.8% | 26.6% |
| Forward P/E | 6.5x | 6.6x |
| Total Debt | $129M | $1.23B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $272M |
ASC vs TRMD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ardmore Shipping Co… (ASC) | 100 | 321.7 | +221.7% |
| TORM plc (TRMD) | 100 | 411.4 | +311.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASC vs TRMD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 20.3%, current ratio 4.33x
- Beta 0.48, yield 2.0%, current ratio 4.33x
TRMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 2.6%, EPS growth -15.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 36.0%
- 5.8% 10Y total return vs ASC's 151.2%
- 2.6% revenue growth vs ASC's -23.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.6% revenue growth vs ASC's -23.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.5x vs 6.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.4% margin vs ASC's 13.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs TRMD's 0.54, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 16.7% yield, vs ASC's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +106.3% vs ASC's +92.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.7% ROA vs ASC's 5.5%, ROIC 18.0% vs 9.0% |
ASC vs TRMD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ASC vs TRMD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 4.2x ASC's $310M. TRMD is the more profitable business, keeping 21.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASC's 13.2%. On growth, ASC holds the edge at +1.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $310M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $101M | $555M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $41M | $277M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$41M | $242M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +47.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.8% | +26.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +21.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.2% | +18.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.1% | -7.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.7% | -43.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TRMD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.2x trailing earnings, TRMD trades at a 76% valuation discount to ASC's 21.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TRMD's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ASC's 7.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $767M | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $849M | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.35x | 5.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.48x | 6.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.22x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.39x | 5.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.47x | 2.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 1.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ASC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRMD delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $6 for ASC. ASC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRMD's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASC scores 5/9 vs TRMD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +12.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | +8.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +18.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +22.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $82M | $954M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $272M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $129M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.70x | 4.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRMD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRMD five years ago would be worth $54,745 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $47,367 for ASC. Over the past 12 months, TRMD leads with a +106.3% total return vs ASC's +92.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRMD at 16.1% vs ASC's 15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +80.7% | +69.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +92.9% | +106.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.7% | +56.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +373.7% | +447.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +151.2% | +582.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.7% | +16.1% |
Risk & Volatility
ASC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ASC is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRMD's 0.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASC currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs TRMD's 94.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.20 | $34.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.18 | $15.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.9% | +94.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 79.6 | 79.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 674K | 915K |
Analyst Outlook
TRMD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ASC as "Buy" and TRMD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.4% upside for TRMD (target: $35) vs 1.1% for ASC (target: $19). For income investors, TRMD offers the higher dividend yield at 16.66% vs ASC's 2.00%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +16.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.38 | $5.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TRMD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ASC leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility).
ASC vs TRMD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASC or TRMD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TORM plc (TRMD) is the stronger pick with 2.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 6% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC). TORM plc (TRMD) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASC or TRMD?
On trailing P/E, TORM plc (TRMD) is the cheapest at 5.
2x versus Ardmore Shipping Corporation at 21. 4x. On forward P/E, Ardmore Shipping Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASC or TRMD?
Over the past 5 years, TORM plc (TRMD) delivered a total return of +447.
4%, compared to +373. 7% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMD returned +582. 9% versus ASC's +151. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASC or TRMD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
48β versus TORM plc's 0. 54β — meaning TRMD is approximately 13% more volatile than ASC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 59% for TORM plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASC or TRMD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TORM plc (TRMD) is pulling ahead at 2.
6% versus -23. 6% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TORM plc grew EPS -15. 0% year-over-year, compared to -71. 2% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRMD leads at 36. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASC or TRMD?
TORM plc (TRMD) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
3% net margin versus 13. 2% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation — meaning it keeps 39. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMD leads at 42. 3% versus 26. 1% for ASC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMD leads at 60. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASC or TRMD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) trades at 6.
5x forward P/E versus 6. 6x for TORM plc — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRMD: 6. 4% to $35. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASC or TRMD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TORM plc (TRMD) offers the highest yield at 16. 7%, versus 2. 0% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC).
09Is ASC or TRMD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TORM plc (TRMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
54), 16. 7% yield, +582. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRMD: +582. 9%, ASC: +151. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASC and TRMD?
These companies operate in different sectors (ASC (Industrials) and TRMD (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ASC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRMD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.