ASC
Ardmore Shipping Corporation
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$767M
5Y Perf.+221.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ASC vs STNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$4.27B
5Y Perf.+365.4%
ASC vs STNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ASC | STNG |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $767M | $4.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $310M | $938M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $41M | $344M |
| Gross Margin | 28.8% | 46.2% |
| Operating Margin | 20.8% | 33.0% |
| Forward P/E | 6.5x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $129M | $619M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $752M |
ASC vs STNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ASC
STNG
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ardmore Shipping Co… (ASC) | 100 | 321.7 | +221.7% |
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 465.4 | +365.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASC vs STNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: STNG leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Ardmore Shipping Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ASC
Ardmore Shipping Corporation
The Growth Play
ASC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -23.6%, EPS growth -71.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.4%
- 151.2% 10Y total return vs STNG's 61.6%
- -23.6% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
The Income Pick
STNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
- Beta 0.28, yield 2.0%, current ratio 9.33x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ASC | -23.6% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6% |
| Value | ASC | Lower P/E (6.5x vs 8.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | STNG | 36.7% margin vs ASC's 13.2% |
| Stability / Safety | STNG | Beta 0.28 vs ASC's 0.48, lower leverage |
| Dividends | STNG | 2.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ASC's 2.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | STNG | +107.1% vs ASC's +92.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | STNG | 8.7% ROA vs ASC's 5.5%, ROIC 7.2% vs 9.0% |
ASC vs STNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSTNGLAGGINGASC
ASCArdmore Shipping Corp…
1leads
STNGScorpio Tankers Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ASCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
STNG5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ASC4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
STNG5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
STNG4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
STNG2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $938M annually — 3.0x ASC's $310M. STNG is the more profitable business, keeping 36.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASC's 13.2%. On growth, STNG holds the edge at +23.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ASCArdmore Shipping … | STNGScorpio Tankers I… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $310M | $938M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $101M | $490M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $41M | $344M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$41M | $428M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +46.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.8% | +33.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +36.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.2% | +45.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.1% | +23.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.7% | +81.1% |
STNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ASC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, STNG trades at a 45% valuation discount to ASC's 21.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ASC's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STNG's 8.4x.
| Metric | ASCArdmore Shipping … | STNGScorpio Tankers I… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $767M | $4.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $849M | $4.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.35x | 11.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.48x | 8.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.39x | 8.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.47x | 4.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 1.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.70x |
ASC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STNG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STNG delivers a 11.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $6 for ASC. STNG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ASC's 0.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STNG scores 6/9 vs ASC's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ASCArdmore Shipping … | STNGScorpio Tankers I… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | +8.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +8.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $82M | -$133M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $752M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $129M | $619M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.70x | 4.21x |
STNG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STNG five years ago would be worth $48,851 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $47,367 for ASC. Over the past 12 months, STNG leads with a +107.1% total return vs ASC's +92.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STNG at 23.4% vs ASC's 15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ASCArdmore Shipping … | STNGScorpio Tankers I… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +80.7% | +67.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +92.9% | +107.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.7% | +88.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +373.7% | +388.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +151.2% | +61.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.7% | +23.4% |
STNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ASC and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASC's 0.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASC currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs STNG's 94.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ASCArdmore Shipping … | STNGScorpio Tankers I… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.20 | $87.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.18 | $37.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.9% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 79.6 | 73.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 674K | 1.2M |
Evenly matched — ASC and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
STNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ASC as "Buy" and STNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 3.4% upside for STNG (target: $85) vs 1.1% for ASC (target: $19). For income investors, STNG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.04% vs ASC's 2.00%.
| Metric | ASCArdmore Shipping … | STNGScorpio Tankers I… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $85.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.38 | $1.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
STNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
STNG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ASC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallScorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ASC vs STNG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASC or STNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) is the stronger pick with -23.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASC or STNG?
On trailing P/E, Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the cheapest at 11. 7x versus Ardmore Shipping Corporation at 21. 4x. On forward P/E, Ardmore Shipping Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASC or STNG?
Over the past 5 years, Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) delivered a total return of +388. 5%, compared to +373. 7% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASC returned +151. 2% versus STNG's +61. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASC or STNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Ardmore Shipping Corporation's 0. 48β — meaning ASC is approximately 71% more volatile than STNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 20% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASC or STNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) is pulling ahead at -23.
6% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Scorpio Tankers Inc. grew EPS -46. 5% year-over-year, compared to -71. 2% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASC leads at -11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASC or STNG?
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 13. 2% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STNG leads at 33. 0% versus 26. 1% for ASC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STNG leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASC or STNG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) trades at 6.
5x forward P/E versus 8. 4x for Scorpio Tankers Inc. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STNG: 3. 4% to $85. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASC or STNG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 2. 0% for Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC).
09Is ASC or STNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (STNG: +61. 6%, ASC: +151. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASC and STNG?
These companies operate in different sectors (ASC (Industrials) and STNG (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ASC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STNG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ASC: 1.1% · STNG: 23.9%)Net Margin>
%
(ASC: 13.2% · STNG: 36.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(ASC: 21.4x · STNG: 11.7x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.