Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
ASIC vs JRVR vs HRTG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Specialty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
ASIC vs JRVR vs HRTG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Specialty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $933M | $198M | $861M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $424M | $667M | $847M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $74M | $29M | $196M |
| Gross Margin | 50.0% | 27.4% | 47.2% |
| Operating Margin | 22.6% | 3.6% | 31.7% |
| Forward P/E | 10.0x | 3.9x | 6.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $330M | $100M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $261M | $559M |
ASIC vs JRVR vs HRTG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ategrity Specialty … (ASIC) | 100 | 90.2 | -9.8% |
| James River Group H… (JRVR) | 100 | 73.4 | -26.6% |
| Heritage Insurance … (HRTG) | 100 | 112.4 | +12.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASIC vs JRVR vs HRTG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASIC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.31, yield 0.8%
- 23.4% revenue growth vs JRVR's -2.8%
- Beta 0.31 vs JRVR's 0.50
JRVR is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 0.10 vs HRTG's 0.39
- Beta 0.50, yield 0.8%, current ratio 0.91x
- Lower P/E (3.9x vs 10.0x)
HRTG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth 214.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.6%
- 119.4% 10Y total return vs ASIC's -21.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 19.8%, current ratio 152.87x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.4% revenue growth vs JRVR's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.9x vs 10.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs JRVR's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs JRVR's 0.50 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JRVR's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.3% vs ASIC's -21.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.4% ROA vs JRVR's 0.7%, ROIC 15.4% vs 5.9% |
ASIC vs JRVR vs HRTG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ASIC vs JRVR vs HRTG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HRTG leads in 4 of 6 categories
ASIC leads 0 • JRVR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HRTG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HRTG is the larger business by revenue, generating $847M annually — 2.0x ASIC's $424M. HRTG is the more profitable business, keeping 23.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JRVR's 4.3%. On growth, HRTG holds the edge at +2.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $424M | $667M | $847M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $97M | $25M | $281M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $74M | $29M | $196M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $100M | $29M | $177M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.0% | +27.4% | +47.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.6% | +3.6% | +31.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.4% | +4.3% | +23.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.5% | +4.4% | +20.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -12.1% | +2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.8% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
HRTG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.4x trailing earnings, HRTG trades at a 63% valuation discount to ASIC's 12.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HRTG offers better value at 0.06x vs JRVR's 0.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $933M | $198M | $861M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $903M | $267M | $402M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.13x | 5.44x | 4.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.99x | 3.91x | 6.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.14x | 0.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.29x | 5.35x | 1.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.20x | 0.29x | 1.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 0.38x | 1.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.63x | — | 4.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HRTG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRTG delivers a 47.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $47 in annual profit, vs $5 for JRVR. HRTG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JRVR's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HRTG scores 7/9 vs JRVR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.5% | +4.7% | +47.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.4% | +0.7% | +8.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.0% | +5.9% | +15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.7% | +4.3% | +11.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.49x | 0.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30M | $69M | -$459M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $261M | $559M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $330M | $100M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 71.63x | 1.78x | 33.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HRTG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HRTG five years ago would be worth $30,138 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,565 for JRVR. Over the past 12 months, HRTG leads with a +15.3% total return vs ASIC's -21.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HRTG at 89.9% vs JRVR's -39.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.7% | -30.0% | +2.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.4% | -9.6% | +15.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.4% | -78.1% | +585.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.4% | -84.3% | +201.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.4% | -58.2% | +119.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.7% | -39.7% | +89.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ASIC and HRTG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ASIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JRVR's 0.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HRTG currently trades 87.6% from its 52-week high vs JRVR's 59.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.31x | 0.50x | 0.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.30 | $7.20 | $31.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.35 | $4.29 | $16.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.7% | +59.7% | +87.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.7 | 15.4 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 88K | 296K | 282K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ASIC and JRVR and HRTG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASIC as "Buy", JRVR as "Buy", HRTG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 62.8% upside for JRVR (target: $7) vs 31.4% for ASIC (target: $26). For income investors, JRVR offers the higher dividend yield at 0.77% vs ASIC's 0.76%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.50 | $7.00 | $39.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 13 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.15 | $0.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
HRTG leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
ASIC vs JRVR vs HRTG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASIC or JRVR or HRTG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) is the stronger pick with 23.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for James River Group Holdings, Ltd. (JRVR). Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) offers the better valuation at 4. 4x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ASIC or JRVR or HRTG?
On trailing P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) is the cheapest at 4. 4x versus Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC at 12. 1x. On forward P/E, James River Group Holdings, Ltd. is actually cheaper at 3. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: James River Group Holdings, Ltd. wins at 0. 10x versus Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 39x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ASIC or JRVR or HRTG?
Over the past 5 years, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) delivered a total return of +201. 4%, compared to -84. 3% for James River Group Holdings, Ltd. (JRVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HRTG returned +119. 4% versus JRVR's -58. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ASIC or JRVR or HRTG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
31β versus James River Group Holdings, Ltd. 's 0. 50β — meaning JRVR is approximately 61% more volatile than ASIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 49% for James River Group Holdings, Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ASIC or JRVR or HRTG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) is pulling ahead at 23.
4% versus -2. 8% for James River Group Holdings, Ltd. (JRVR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 214. 4% year-over-year, compared to 66. 7% for Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC. Over a 3-year CAGR, HRTG leads at 8. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ASIC or JRVR or HRTG?
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 1% net margin versus 6. 9% for James River Group Holdings, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 23. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HRTG leads at 30. 6% versus 7. 4% for JRVR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HRTG leads at 63. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ASIC or JRVR or HRTG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, James River Group Holdings, Ltd. (JRVR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 10x versus Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 39x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, James River Group Holdings, Ltd. (JRVR) trades at 3. 9x forward P/E versus 10. 0x for Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JRVR: 62. 8% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ASIC or JRVR or HRTG?
In this comparison, JRVR (0.
8% yield), ASIC (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. HRTG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ASIC or JRVR or HRTG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
31), 0. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASIC: -21. 4%, HRTG: +119. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ASIC and JRVR and HRTG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ASIC is a small-cap high-growth stock; JRVR is a small-cap deep-value stock; HRTG is a small-cap deep-value stock. ASIC, JRVR pay a dividend while HRTG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.