Chemicals
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ASPI vs NTIC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
ASPI vs NTIC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $517M | $76M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $86M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-106M | $-306K |
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 37.0% |
| Operating Margin | -5.1% | -4.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4444.4x |
| Total Debt | $38M | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $62M | $7M |
ASPI vs NTIC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASP Isotopes Inc. C… (ASPI) | 100 | 259.0 | +159.0% |
| Northern Technologi… (NTIC) | 100 | 61.5 | -38.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ASPI vs NTIC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ASPI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.70, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth -28.6%
- 107.5% 10Y total return vs NTIC's 41.6%
NTIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 17.1%, current ratio 1.86x
- -0.4% margin vs ASPI's -12.6%
- Beta 0.38 vs ASPI's 2.70, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs NTIC's -1.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.4% margin vs ASPI's -12.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs ASPI's 2.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NTIC's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +11.7% vs ASPI's +0.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.3% ROA vs ASPI's -77.2%, ROIC -5.6% vs -98.6% |
ASPI vs NTIC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ASPI vs NTIC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTIC is the larger business by revenue, generating $86M annually — 10.3x ASPI's $8M. NTIC is the more profitable business, keeping -0.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASPI's -12.6%. On growth, ASPI holds the edge at +3.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $86M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$42M | -$2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$106M | -$305,653 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$34M | -$3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +37.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | -4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -12.6% | -0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | -3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.5% | +9.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.0% | -47.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NTIC leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $517M | $76M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $493M | $82M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.79x | 4444.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 124.83x | 0.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.03x | 1.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTIC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTIC delivers a -0.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-0 in annual profit, vs $-190 for ASPI. NTIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ASPI's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASPI scores 5/9 vs NTIC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -190.4% | -0.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -77.2% | -0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -98.6% | -5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -47.1% | -7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.74x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $62M | $7M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38M | $13M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -268.41x | 5.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASPI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASPI five years ago would be worth $20,749 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,957 for NTIC. Over the past 12 months, NTIC leads with a +11.7% total return vs ASPI's +0.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASPI at 113.4% vs NTIC's -9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.6% | -1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.9% | +11.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +871.9% | -24.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.5% | -40.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.5% | +41.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +113.4% | -9.1% |
Risk & Volatility
NTIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASPI's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTIC currently trades 79.8% from its 52-week high vs ASPI's 38.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.70x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.49 | $10.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.92 | $7.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.2% | +79.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 46.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.5M | 10K |
Analyst Outlook
ASPI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, ASPI offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs NTIC's 1.97%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $49929.39 | $0.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NTIC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ASPI leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook).
ASPI vs NTIC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ASPI or NTIC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ASP Isotopes Inc.
Common Stock (ASPI) is the stronger pick with 857. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 0% for Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC). Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) offers the better valuation at 4444. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ASP Isotopes Inc. Common Stock (ASPI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ASPI or NTIC?
Over the past 5 years, ASP Isotopes Inc.
Common Stock (ASPI) delivered a total return of +107. 5%, compared to -40. 4% for Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASPI returned +107. 5% versus NTIC's +41. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ASPI or NTIC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus ASP Isotopes Inc. Common Stock's 2. 70β — meaning ASPI is approximately 617% more volatile than NTIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 74% for ASP Isotopes Inc. Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ASPI or NTIC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ASP Isotopes Inc.
Common Stock (ASPI) is pulling ahead at 857. 0% versus -1. 0% for Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ASP Isotopes Inc. Common Stock grew EPS -28. 6% year-over-year, compared to -99. 7% for Northern Technologies International Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ASPI or NTIC?
Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -780. 2% for ASP Isotopes Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTIC leads at -7. 1% versus -635. 9% for ASPI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASPI leads at 38. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ASPI or NTIC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
ASP Isotopes Inc. Common Stock (ASPI) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 2. 0% for Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC).
07Is ASPI or NTIC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38), 2. 0% yield). ASP Isotopes Inc. Common Stock (ASPI) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTIC: +41. 6%, ASPI: +107. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ASPI and NTIC?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ASPI is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare NTIC vs KLIC
KLIC is one of the most direct listed alternatives to NTIC.
Compare ASPI vs LEU
LEU overlaps with ASPI in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With KLIC + ASIX
KLIC and ASIX are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.